10 research outputs found

    Author Credit for Transdisciplinary Collaboration

    No full text
    <div><p>Transdisciplinary collaboration is the key for innovation. An evaluation mechanism is necessary to ensure that academic credit for this costly process can be allocated fairly among coauthors. This paper proposes a set of quantitative measures (e.g., t_credit and t_index) to reflect authors’ transdisciplinary contributions to publications. These measures are based on paper-topic probability distributions and author-topic probability distributions. We conduct an empirical analysis of the information retrieval domain which demonstrates that these measures effectively improve the results of harmonic_credit and h_index measures by taking into account the transdisciplinary contributions of authors. The definitions of t_credit and t_index provide a fair and effective way for research organizations to assign credit to authors of transdisciplinary publications.</p></div

    Segmented cumulative counts of the 100 top-ranked authors based on harmonic_credit.

    No full text
    <p>Note: The segments are not separated evenly because tied ranking cases are not uncommon in ranking lists. In each cell, the number means the counts of authors who have the same rank range in both ranking list of harmonic_credit and ranking list of t_credit<sub>sum</sub>, and the percentage in brackets means the percentage of the counts of authors who have the same range in both ranking list.</p><p>Segmented cumulative counts of the 100 top-ranked authors based on harmonic_credit.</p

    The representative credit-assignment schemas’ distribution.

    No full text
    <p>The representative credit-assignment schemas’ distribution.</p

    Segmented counts of the 100 top-ranked authors based on harmonic_credit.

    No full text
    <p>Note: The segments are not separated evenly because tied ranking cases are not uncommon in ranking lists. In each cell, the number means the counts of authors who have the same rank range in both ranking list of harmonic_credit and ranking list of t_credit<sub>sum</sub>, and the percentage in brackets means the percentage of the counts of authors who have the same range in both ranking list.</p><p>Segmented counts of the 100 top-ranked authors based on harmonic_credit.</p

    Segmented cumulative counts of the 106 top-ranked authors based on h_index.

    No full text
    <p>Note: The segments are not separated evenly because tied ranking cases are not uncommon in ranking lists. In each cell, the number means the counts of authors who have the same rank range in both ranking list of h_index and ranking list of t_index, and the percentage in brackets means the percentage of the counts of authors who have the same range in both ranking list.</p><p>Segmented cumulative counts of the 106 top-ranked authors based on h_index.</p

    Difference in ranks of the 20 top-ranked authors based on the harmonic_credit schema and t_credit schema.

    No full text
    <p>Note: No. of pub.Number of publications; F pub.(%) Papers as first author; Rank change Rank-order change of harmonic_credit<sub>sum</sub> vs. t_credit<sub>sum</sub>; in Rank change column, zero indicates that rank order does not change, a positive number indicates that rank order increases, and a negative number indicates a decrease.</p><p>Difference in ranks of the 20 top-ranked authors based on the harmonic_credit schema and t_credit schema.</p

    The comparision between ranks of t_index and h_index.

    No full text
    <p>The comparision between ranks of t_index and h_index.</p

    Segmented counts of the 106 top-ranked authors based on h_index.

    No full text
    <p>Note: The segments are not separated evenly because tied ranking cases are not uncommon in ranking lists. In each cell, the number means the counts of authors who have the same rank range in both ranking list of h_index and ranking list of t_index, and the percentage in brackets means the percentage of the counts of authors who have the same range in both ranking list.</p><p>Segmented counts of the 106 top-ranked authors based on h_index.</p

    Examples of evaluating the author transdisciplinary contribution.

    No full text
    <p>Examples of evaluating the author transdisciplinary contribution.</p

    The comparison between values of t_index and h_index.

    No full text
    <p>The comparison between values of t_index and h_index.</p
    corecore