8 research outputs found

    Solar Cell Cracks and Finger Failure Detection Using Statistical Parameters of Electroluminescence Images and Machine Learning

    Get PDF
    A wide range of defects, failures, and degradation can develop at different stages in the lifetime of photovoltaic modules. To accurately assess their effect on the module performance, these failures need to be quantified. Electroluminescence (EL) imaging is a powerful diagnostic method, providing high spatial resolution images of solar cells and modules. EL images allow the identification and quantification of different types of failures, including those in high recombination regions, as well as series resistance-related problems. In this study, almost 46,000 EL cell images are extracted from photovoltaic modules with different defects. We present a method that extracts statistical parameters from the histogram of these images and utilizes them as a feature descriptor. Machine learning algorithms are then trained using this descriptor to classify the detected defects into three categories: (i) cracks (Mode B and C), (ii) micro-cracks (Mode A) and finger failures, and (iii) no failures. By comparing the developed methods with the commonly used one, this study demonstrates that the pre-processing of images into a feature vector of statistical parameters provides a higher classification accuracy than would be obtained by raw images alone. The proposed method can autonomously detect cracks and finger failures, enabling outdoor EL inspection using a drone-mounted system for quick assessments of photovoltaic fields.</p

    Machine Learning Prediction of Defect Types for Electroluminescence Images of Photovoltaic Panels

    Get PDF
    Despite recent technological advances for Photovoltaic panels maintenance (Electroluminescence imaging, drone inspection), only few large-scale studies achieve identification of the precise category of defects or faults. In this work, Electroluminescence imaged modules are automatically split into cells using projections on the x and y axes to detect cell boundaries. Regions containing potential defects or faults are then detected using Hough transform combined with mathematical morphology. Care is taken to remove most of the bus bars or cell boundaries. Afterwards, 25 features are computed, focusing on both the geometry of the regions (e.g. area, perimeter, circularity) and the statistical characteristics of their pixel values (e.g. median, standard deviation, skewness). Finally, features are mapped to the ground truth labels with Support Vector Machine (RBF kernel) and Random Forest algorithms, coupled with undersampling and SMOTE oversampling, with a stratified 5- folds approach for cross validation. A dataset of 982 Electroluminescence images of installed multi-crystalline photovoltaic modules was acquired in outdoor conditions (evening) with a CMOS sensor. After automatic blur detection, 753 images or 47244 cells remain to evaluate faults. All images were evaluated by experts in PV fault detection that labelled: Finger failures, and three types of cracks based on their respective severity levels (A, B and C). Our results based on 6 data series, yield using Support Vector Machine an accuracy of 0.997 and a recall of 0.274. Improving the region detection process will most likely allow improving the performance

    Method for Estimation and Correction of Perspective Distortion of Electroluminescence Images of Photovoltaic Panels

    Get PDF
    The number of photovoltaic panels installed globally is continuously growing, requiring an automatic inspection procedure for operation and maintenance. Drones can be a useful tool to this aim as they enable fast acquisition of various imaging modalities: visual, infrared, or electroluminescence (EL). Image distortions due to perspective must be corrected to allow further automatic processing. It can be done by estimating the corresponding rotation angles to control the camera gimbal or as postprocessing to rectify the images. This article presents two methods to achieve both goals by identifying known points in the acquired image. The first method detects the four panel corners, whereas the second method finds the corners of each cell. The performance evaluation is performed first quantitatively on a validation dataset composed of 113 EL images and their corresponding ground-truth orientations. A qualitative evaluation shows satisfying performance of the rectification similarly for both methods. The quantitative performance is varying for each rotation axis. The average absolute error is 2.78∘^{\circ } along the xx-axis, 2.64∘^{\circ } along the yy-axis, and 1.28∘^{\circ } along the zz-axis for the panel method and 3.26∘^{\circ }, 2.05∘^{\circ }, and 1.24∘^{\circ } for the cell method. As a proof of concept, a final test on drone-acquired EL images shows good performance for the image rectification in real-life conditions.</p

    Sunlight Variation Study for Drone-Based Daylight Electroluminescence Imaging of PV Modules

    No full text
    In this paper, we present a study of daylight EL acquisition and the results of a sunlight variation study in a scenario necessary to assure the increase of EL image quality with denoising by averaging for the robustness of the drone system when bright and intermittently cloudy days occur. It was verified that the indicator of image quality based on the signal-to-noise ratio of EL images has a linear behavior with the amount of averaged images when there is no sun variation. When there are sun irradiance variation, it is observed that the quality decrease even with the increased number of images being averaged, turning to increase again only with further additional images
    corecore