Anxiety, Depression and HRQoL Ratings Stratified by Self-Report and Parental Proxy Report.

<p>Anxiety, Depression and HRQoL Ratings Stratified by Self-Report and Parental Proxy Report.</p

Regression Model, Self-Reported Depression and HRQoL.

<p>Cumulative distribution functions (fit between probability distributions) of self-reported depression against self-reported HRQoL. The Probability-Probability (P-P) plot demarks the fit of probability distributions, The data presented are approximately linear, which suggests that the specified theoretical distribution was the correct model (e.g. a good fit between the specific distribution and the observed data).</p

Participant Recruitment and Final Sample Flow Diagram.

<p>This figure documents the participant recruitment process, sources, participation and decline rates, accounting for the final sample.</p

Participant Demographics and Injury Characteristics.

<p>NA = information was not documented in medical file; Short Duration = written as “short duration” in the medical file, no time/quantifiable duration recorded; TBI severity reported according to Mayo Classification System <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0101842#pone.0101842-Malec1" target="_blank">[29]</a>; SP = symptomatic possible TBI; MP = mild probable TBI; MSD = Moderate-severe definite TBI. *Previous skull fracture as infant (<1 year of age).</p

Response rate and sample characteristics for cohort 1 and 2.

<p>^a n = number of parents approached to participate</p><p>^b Socio Economic Indexes for Areas Disadvantage</p><p>^c ‘Response received’ includes parents who responded indicating they did not consent to participation</p><p>Note: Response rates may differ to other papers reporting on the Children’s Attention Project sample. Other papers reporting on this sample report slightly lower response rates due to exclusionary criteria applied post the return of the baseline screening surveys</p><p>Response rate and sample characteristics for cohort 1 and 2.</p

Sample characteristics of participants and non-participants in cohort 1 and cohort 2.

<p>^a Participants are parents who completed the screening survey</p><p>^<b>b</b> Socio Economic Indexes for Areas Disadvantage</p><p>Sample characteristics of participants and non-participants in cohort 1 and cohort 2.</p

Associations between peer relationships and self-esteem after childhood traumatic brain injury: exploring the mediating role of loneliness

Associations between peer relationships and self-esteem after childhood traumatic brain injury: exploring the mediating role of lonelines

List of activations for contrasts of interest.

<p>List of activations for contrasts of interest.</p

List of activations for active encoding and retrieval compared to baseline condition.

<p>List of activations for active encoding and retrieval compared to baseline condition.</p

Pearson’s correlations between activity of functional ROIs and (a) age or (b) retrieval accuracy.

<p>Pearson’s correlations between activity of functional ROIs and (a) age or (b) retrieval accuracy.</p