35 research outputs found

    AMPA antagonist ZK200775 in patients with acute ischemic stroke - Possible glial cell toxicity detected by monitoring of S-100B serum levels

    No full text
    Background and Purpose-S-100B and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) serum concentrations can be used as peripheral markers of glial cell and neuronal damage, respectively. We investigated these markers in a clinical trial with the alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionate (AMPA) antagonist ZK200775 in acute ischemic stroke patients. Methods-In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial, 61 ischemic stroke patients were treated with either placebo or active drug in a dose-finding design. Twenty-five patients received placebo, 12 patients received a total dose of 262.5 mg in 48 hours (dose group 1), and 13 patients received a total dose of 525 mg in 48 hours (dose group 2). Eleven patients received a total dose of 105 mg over a period of 6 hours (dose group 3; reduction of total dose and infusion time because of adverse events in group 2). Serum concentrations of S-100B and NSE were analyzed with the use of a monoclonal sandwich immunoluminometric assay. Neurological outcome was assessed with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Results-In group 2 there was a significant transient worsening in the mean NIHSS score 48 hours after the start of treatment. The mean increase was 11 points. This was due to reduction of consciousness (stupor and coma) in 8 of 13 patients. Neurological deterioration in group 2 was associated with a higher increase of S-100B concentrations, but not of NSE concentrations, than in the placebo group. The trial was stopped prematurely for safety reasons. Conclusions-The AMPA antagonist ZK200775 transiently worsened the neurological condition in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Our results suggest that in addition to neuronal dysfunction, glial cell toxicity may have occurred. It may be useful to introduce monitoring of serum markers of brain damage in phase 2 trials with glutamate receptor antagonists

    Can the expanded disability status scale be assessed by telephone?

    Full text link
    Information from patients who are unable to continue their visits to a study centre may be of major importance for the interpretation of results in multiple sclerosis (MS) clinical trials. To validate a questionnaire based on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), patients in five different European centres were assessed independently by pairs of trained EDSS raters, first by telephone interview and a few days later by standardized neurological examination. Seventy women and 40 men with an average age of 43.7 years (range 19-74 years) were included in the study. Mean EDSS score at the last visit was 4.5 (0-9). EDSS assessment by telephone was highly correlated with the EDSS determined by physical examination (Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.95). An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 94.8% was found for the total sample; 77.6% and 86%, respectively, for patients with EDSS 4.5 (n = 64). Kappa values for full agreement were 0.48; for variation by +0.5 steps and +1.0 steps, 0.79 and 0.90, respectively. Best agreement could be found in higher EDSS scores, where assessment by telephone interview might be needed most. The telephone questionnaire is a valid tool to assess EDSS score in cases where the patient is unable to continue visiting a study centre or in long-term follow-up of trial participants
    corecore