6 research outputs found

    A silent mutation in <i>CUC1</i> does not change floral organ numbers in a Columbia-0 background but induces extra floral organs in <i>hws-1</i>, <i>cuc1-1D</i> and <i>hws-1/cuc1-1D</i>.

    No full text
    <p>(<b>A, D, G, J, M</b>), Lateral view; (<b>B, E, H, K</b>), Aerial view; (<b>C, F, I, L</b>), dissected flowers of primary transformants in the following backgrounds: (<b>A-C</b>), Columbia-0; (<b>D-F</b>), <i>hws-1</i>; (<b>G-I</b>), <i>cuc1-1D</i>; and (<b>J-L</b>), <i>hws-1/cuc1-1D</i>, note bifurcated anther inidicated with a white star in panel L. (<b>M</b>), Mature siliques showing suppression of sepal fusion in <i>hws-1</i>: left silique originated from a <i>hws-1</i> mutant, right silique originated from a primary transformant <i>hws-1</i> plant transformed with <i>CUC1-SV</i>. Scale bars: 1mm. Black and white stars show altered floral organs.</p

    Mutations and constructs in <i>CUC1</i>, <i>CUC2</i> and <i>MIR164</i>.

    No full text
    <p>Schematic diagram of <i>MIR164</i>, <i>MIR164</i> complementary binding sites in <i>CUC1</i> and <i>CUC2</i> mRNAs and CUC1, CUC2 proteins or their equivalent in generated constructs; (<b>A</b>), wild type (<b>B</b>), <i>cuc1-1D</i> mutation; (<b>C</b>), <i>cuc1-1D</i> mutation and <i>MIR164</i> modified site introduced for complementation analyses; (<b>D</b>), <i>cuc2-1D</i> mutation (modified from [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0185106#pone.0185106.ref024" target="_blank">24</a>]); (<b>E</b>), <i>cuc1-1D</i> silent version (<i>cuc1-1D-SV</i>). Mutations are underlined, the amino acid substitutions are identified in red/blue font, and changes in binding affinity from the <i>MIR164</i> are indicated with a red dot. (<b>F-K</b>), Complementation analyses in primary transformants using a modified version of <i>MIR164B</i>; (<b>F-G</b>), aerial and (<b>H-I</b>), lateral view of flowers at stage 15a and (<b>J-K</b>), lateral view of mature siliques from complementation lines in <i>cuc1-1D</i> and <i>hws-1/cuc1-1D</i> backgrounds using the <i>35S</i><sub><i>pro</i></sub>::<i>164B C→T</i> construct, arrows show sepal fusion. Twenty-four primary independent transformants from each line were analysed. All transformants reverted or not the sepal fusion phenotype in the <i>cuc1-1D</i> and <i>hws-1/cuc1-1D</i> backgrounds respectively. Scale bars: 30 μm F-G and 1mm in H-K.</p

    <i>HWS</i> affect cell proliferation in petals.

    No full text
    <p>Analyses of (<b>A</b>), petals size (mm<sup>2</sup>) and (<b>B</b>), petal cell size (μm<sup>2</sup>) in Columbia-0, <i>hws-1</i>, <i>cuc1-1D</i>, and <i>hws-1/cuc1-1D</i>. Five flowers from four independent plants from each genotype were dissected and their size and the size of petal cells were determined. (<b>C</b>), Relative petal and cell sizes compared to Columbia-0 (100%). Stars indicate a significant difference in the mean at P≤0.001 n = 80.</p

    Floral organ number is affected in single, double and triple mutants of <i>hws-1</i>, <i>cuc1-1D</i> and <i>cuc2-1D</i>.

    No full text
    <p>Comparative phenotypic analyses of flowers at developmental stage 15a. (<b>A-E</b>), lateral view of flowers; (<b>F-J</b>), close up of sepal separation; (<b>K-O</b>), aerial view at stage 15a from: (<b>A, F, K</b>) <i>cuc1-1D</i>; (<b>B, G, L</b>), <i>cuc2-1D</i>; (<b>C, H, M</b>), <i>hws-1/cuc2-1D</i>; (<b>D, I, N</b>), <i>cuc1-1D/ cuc2-1D</i> and (<b>E, J, O</b>), <i>hws-1/cuc1-1D/cuc2-1D</i>. (<b>P-W</b>), dissected flowers at stage 15a from: (<b>P</b>) Columbia-0, (<b>Q</b>) <i>hws-1</i>, (<b>R</b>) <i>cuc1-1D</i>, (<b>S</b>) <i>cuc2-1D</i>, (<b>T</b>) <i>hws-1/cuc1-1D</i>, (<b>U</b>) <i>hws-1/cuc2-1D</i>, (<b>V</b>) <i>cuc1-1D/ cuc2-1D</i> and (<b>W</b>) <i>hws-1/cuc1-1D/cuc2-1D</i>. Scale bars: 1 mm in (<b>A-J</b>) and 300 μm in (<b>K-W</b>), * show misshapen organs. (<b>X</b>), Five flowers from six plants of each genotype were dissected and their floral organs quantified and statistically analysed by regression analyses using generalized linear models. Stars indicate a significant difference in the mean at P≤0.05 n = 30. Bars indicate SD.</p

    The <i>shs1</i> mutant is an allele of <i>CUC1</i>.

    No full text
    <p>(<b>A-H</b>), Aerial and (<b>I-P</b>), lateral views of flowers at stage 15a; and (<b>Q-X</b>), lateral view of mature green siliques. From: (<b>A, I, Q</b>), Columbia-0; (<b>B, J, R</b>), <i>hws-1</i> (Columbia-0 background);(<b>C, K, S</b>), <i>hws-2</i> (<i>L</i>er background); (<b>D, L, T</b>), <i>hws-1/shs</i>+/-; (E, M. U), <i>hws-1/shs1 (hws-1/cuc1-1D)</i>; and primary transformants of (<b>F, N, V</b>), Columbia-0; (<b>G, O, W</b>), <i>hws-1</i>; and (<b>H, P, X</b>), <i>hws-2</i> complemented with a genomic region containing the <i>CUC1pr</i>::<i>CUC1-1D</i> gene. Scale bars: 1mm. Arrows show the sepal fusions. A petal in F and a sepal on P have been removed. * in N shows stamen fusion. (<b>Y</b>), Mapping strategy used to identify the <i>cuc1-1D</i> mutation. Structure of the gene and location of the transition substitution (G→A) 1,238bp from the ATG are included, intragenic regions are represented by thin lines and exons by black boxes.</p

    Transcript levels of <i>CUC1 CUC2</i>, <i>MIR164A</i>, <i>MIR164B</i> and <i>MIR164C</i> genes are affected in single and double mutants and in the <i>Pro</i><sub><i>35</i></sub>:<i>HWS</i> lines.

    No full text
    <p>RT-qPCR measurements of (<b>A</b>), <i>CUC1</i>; (<b>B</b>), <i>CUC2</i>; (<b>C</b>), <i>HWS</i>; (<b>D</b>), <i>MIR164A</i>; (<b>E</b>), <i>MIR164B</i>; (<b>F</b>), <i>MIR164C</i> RNA levels in Columbia-0, <i>hws-1</i>, <i>35S</i><sub><i>pro</i></sub>:<i>HWS</i>, <i>cuc1-1D</i>, <i>hws-1/cuc1-1D</i> and <i>cuc2-1D</i>. Stars indicate a significant difference in the mean at P≤0.001. Relative expression values represent the mean ± SD of three biological replicates and two technical replicates from each sample (n = 30).</p
    corecore