Detection of susceptibility genes as modifiers due to subgroup differences in complex disease

Complex diseases invariably involve multiple genes and often exhibit variable symptom profiles. The extent to which disease symptoms, course, and severity differ between affected individuals may result from underlying genetic heterogeneity. Genes with modifier effects may or may not also influence disease susceptibility. In this study, we have simulated data in which a subset of cases differ by some effect size (ES) on a quantitative trait and are also enriched for a risk allele. Power to detect this ‘pseudo-modifier' gene in case-only and case–control designs was explored blind to case substructure. Simulations involved 1000 iterations and calculations for 80% power at P<0.01 while varying the risk allele frequency (RAF), sample size (SS), ES, odds ratio (OR), and proportions of the case subgroups. With realistic values for the RAF (0.20), SS (3000) and ES (1), an OR of 1.7 is necessary to detect a pseudo-modifier gene. Unequal numbers of subjects in the case groups result in little decrement in power until the group enriched for the risk allele is <30% or >70% of the total case population. In practice, greater numbers of subjects and selection of a quantitative trait with a large range will provide researchers with greater power to detect a pseudo-modifier gene. However, even under ideal conditions, studies involving alleles with low frequencies or low ORs are usually underpowered for detection of a modifier or susceptibility gene. This may explain some of the inconsistent association results for many candidate gene studies of complex diseases

Fixation using alternative implants for the treatment of hip fractures (FAITH): design and rationale for a multi-centre randomized trial comparing sliding hip screws and cancellous screws on revision surgery rates and quality of life in the treatment of femoral neck fractures

BACKGROUND: Hip fractures are a common type of fragility fracture that afflict 293,000 Americans (over 5,000 per week) and 35,000 Canadians (over 670 per week) annually. Despite the large population impact the optimal fixation technique for low energy femoral neck fractures remains controversial. The primary objective of the FAITH study is to assess the impact of cancellous screw fixation versus sliding hip screws on rates of revision surgery at 24 months in individuals with femoral neck fractures. The secondary objective is to determine the impact on health-related quality of life, functional outcomes, health state utilities, fracture healing, mortality and fracture-related adverse events. METHODS/DESIGN: FAITH is a multi-centre, multi-national randomized controlled trial utilizing minimization to determine patient allocation. Surgeons in North America, Europe, Australia, and Asia will recruit a total of at least 1,000 patients with low-energy femoral neck fractures. Using central randomization, patients will be allocated to receive surgical treatment with cancellous screws or a sliding hip screw. Patient outcomes will be assessed at one week (baseline), 10 weeks, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post initial fixation. We will independently adjudicate revision surgery and complications within 24 months of the initial fixation. Outcome analysis will be performed using a Cox proportional hazards model and likelihood ratio test. DISCUSSION: This study represents major international efforts to definitively resolve the treatment of low-energy femoral neck fractures. This trial will not only change current Orthopaedic practice, but will also set a benchmark for the conduct of future Orthopaedic trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The FAITH trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT00761813)