4 research outputs found
Is being a medical educator a lonely business? The essence of social support
Teaching and Teacher Learning (ICLON
Negotiated assessment and teacher learning: an in-depth exploration
Opportunities for negotiation in formative assessment may benefit teachers' professional development. Detailed analysis of nine assessment dialogues involving pairs of nursing teachers in secondary vocational education showed that the amount of negotiation was limited. Assessment dialogues provided ample opportunities for negotiation (based on expressed disagreement), but more than half of these opportunities were neglected and hence not used to negotiate learning implications. Participants found it difficult to confront a colleague. Possible reasons for this, also methodological, are discussed with a view to future training, formative assessment and research.Teaching and Teacher Learning (ICLON
Reflection revisited: how physicians conceptualize and experience reflection in professional practice – a qualitative study
Background: For the purpose of continuous performance improvement, physicians are expected to reflect on their
practice. While many reflection studies are theoretically oriented and often prescriptive in the sense that they
conceptualize what reflection should look like, the current study starts with practicing physicians themselves and
maps how these physicians conceptualize and experience reflection in daily professional practice.
Methods: We conducted a qualitative study using in-depth interviews with 13 hospital-based physicians from
various specialties and institutions. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and were analyzed iteratively,
following the interpretative phenomenological analysis approach.
Results: Data analysis resulted in the identification of three main topics: fuzziness, domain specificity and dialogical
dynamics of reflection in professional practice. Reflection was conceptualized as a fuzzy process of contemplation
and action, leading to change and hopefully improvement of personal performance and health care in general.
Physicians’ experiences with reflection were different for the patient domain and the team domain. Whereas
experiences in the patient domain were recalled first and discussed in relatively clear terms, those in the team
domain came second and were discussed in more ambiguous terms. In order to achieve improvement in daily
practice, honest and open dialogues were perceived as necessary. These dialogues were regarded as the result of
an interplay between an internal and an external dialogue. The internal dialogue required sensitivity and courage of
the individual; the external dialogue required psychological safety and encouragement of the environment. Within
the team domain however, handling the external dialogue effectively was not self-evident, underlining the
importance of psychological safety.
Conclusions: This study draws attention to the interdependence between the individual and the collective
contributions to reflective activity in professional practice. Apart from its importance to physicians’ individual
medical performance, reflective activity is also important to the functioning of a team of physicians. To allow
reflection to rise from an individual activity to a team activity, it is necessary to invest in a safe environment in
which people are encouraged to think, act, and be engaged.
Keywords: Reflection, Reflective practice, Continuing medical education, Professional development, Qualitative
research method
Profielwerkstuk? Fluitje van een cent
Teaching and Teacher Learning (ICLON