35 research outputs found

    The normativity of intentions

    Get PDF
    Suppose you intend now to φ at some future time t. However, when t has come you do not φ. Something has gone wrong. This failing is not just a causal but also a normative failing. This raises the question how to characterize this failing. I discuss three alternative views. On the first view, the fact that you do not execute your intention to φ is blameworthy only if the balance of reasons pointed to φ-ing. The fact that you intended to u does not add to the reasons for φ-ing at t. On the second view, the fact that you do not execute your intention to φ is blameworthy because you violate a requirement of rationality. Both these views have in common that they deny that intending to φ at t creates a reason to φ at t. The third alternative, the one I defend, claims that you often create reasons to φ by intending to φ.Political Philosophy and Ethic

    Conventions, Norms and Law

    Get PDF
    Philosoph

    The Open Question Argument

    Get PDF
    Philosoph

    Ongedomineerde Vrijheid

    Get PDF
    Political Philosophy and Ethic

    Reasons and Intentions: an introduction

    Get PDF
    Philosoph

    Spinoza en het Ontstaan van de Staat

    Get PDF
    Philosoph

    Het conventionalisme van Den Hartogh

    Get PDF
    Philosoph

    Why is there no philosophy of political science?

    Get PDF
    Political Philosophy and Ethic
    corecore