21 research outputs found

    Identification of Clinically Relevant Protein Targets in Prostate Cancer with 2D-DIGE Coupled Mass Spectrometry and Systems Biology Network Platform

    Get PDF
    Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common type of cancer found in men and among the leading causes of cancer death in the western world. In the present study, we compared the individual protein expression patterns from histologically characterized PCa and the surrounding benign tissue obtained by manual micro dissection using highly sensitive two-dimensional differential gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) coupled with mass spectrometry. Proteomic data revealed 118 protein spots to be differentially expressed in cancer (n = 24) compared to benign (n = 21) prostate tissue. These spots were analysed by MALDI-TOF-MS/MS and 79 different proteins were identified. Using principal component analysis we could clearly separate tumor and normal tissue and two distinct tumor groups based on the protein expression pattern. By using a systems biology approach, we could map many of these proteins both into major pathways involved in PCa progression as well as into a group of potential diagnostic and/or prognostic markers. Due to complexity of the highly interconnected shortest pathway network, the functional sub networks revealed some of the potential candidate biomarker proteins for further validation. By using a systems biology approach, our study revealed novel proteins and molecular networks with altered expression in PCa. Further functional validation of individual proteins is ongoing and might provide new insights in PCa progression potentially leading to the design of novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies

    A–C: Venn diagrams for representation of drug specific protein expression.

    No full text
    <p>Venn diagrams illustrated the drug specific effects in different cell lines: (<b>A</b>) Ba/F3-p210, (<b>B</b>) Ba/F3-M351T and (<b>C</b>) Ba/F3-T351I cells. The numbers inside the circles represent the number of regulated proteins.</p

    Schematic representation of meso network architecture and experimental design.

    No full text
    <p>(<b>A</b>) Exemplifies an abstract meso-scale network representing (abstract) pathways of drug action of drugs A and B on induction of proteins (red, yellow and orange bullets). Drug A uses two pathways (blue and black), whereas the blue pathway induces expression shifts only on a subset of the proteins (red, yellow), whereas the black pathway induces expression shifts in all proteins. Drug B acts only via one pathway which joins the black pathway of Drug A in an abstract node (represented by the green bullet). The mutation inhibits both pathways between the green and blue bullet resulting in an interference with drug induced expression shift for all proteins. The blue pathway from Drug A to the proteins, however, is not affected by the mutation. Hence the mutation may have a strong impact on the efficacy of drug B, whereas the profile of action of drug A is only altered by the mutation. (B) Imatinib sensitive and resistant cells were treated with four tyrosine kinase inhibitor and mesoscale network were reengineered based on specific proteome expression patterns.</p

    A–E: Meso scale networks Ba/F3-p210 cells.

    No full text
    <p>(<b>A</b>) High degree of co-regulation across the protein set for IM, DASA and NILO, which can effectively represented by the mean component of factor analysis. (<b>B</b>) Significant deviations for a small set of proteins for DANU suggesting the use of the more stable factor analysis instead of PCA for reduction of dimension. (<b>C</b>) Analysis quantitatively the amount of induction of protein expression, which is associated with the activation of the dominant mechanisms, quantified by the mean component of factor analysis. Whereas a good and almost similar behaviour for IM, DASA and NILO is observed, DANU activates the proteins in two clearly separated modes (indicated by the upper and lower line of red stars). This finding is supported by quantitatively testing the distribution of the residuals of protein expressions with respect to the linear regression model given by the mean component of factor analysis. (<b>D</b>) Apparently only DANU induces residuals with significant non-gaussian noise indicating the existence of two separate mechanisms of protein induction. (<b>E</b>) Structure of meso scale pathways for induced protein expression. Black block represents induction of the protein expression by the main pathway, whereas the red block is indicating an inhibition via the main pathway.</p

    A–D: Meso scale network models for apoptosis induction.

    No full text
    <p>(<b>A</b>) Distribution of the Pearson coefficient between individual protein expression and the mean component of factor analysis which represents the dominant co-regulation mechanism. (<b>B</b>) Shows that the proteins can be decomposed into two groups differing with respect to the impact of DANU. Most proteins show no different co-regulation behaviour if DANU is omitted from the data set, whereas three proteins show a significantly higher degree of co-regulation (increased r value) when DANU is omitted indicating a second mode of action of DANU. (<b>C</b>) Shows that with exception of two treatments the mean protein expression, represented by the value of the mean component of the factor analysis (y-axis) is correlated to the observed induction of apoptosis (x-axis) indicating a similar efficacy in apoptosis induction for most drugs. The exceptions indicate that protein expression is induced which does not contribute to apoptosis induction. (<b>D</b>) Depicts the meso scale set of pathways, which fits two the observations.</p

    A–D: Meso scale networks Ba/F3-M351T.

    No full text
    <p>(<b>A</b>) Shows the protein expressions for wt and T351 cell type for all drugs. (<b>B</b>) Shows the sensitivity of protein expression with respect to the dominant activation mechanism, quantified by the mean component of factor analysis. (<b>C</b>) Shows, that surprisingly the overall level of protein expression induced by NILO increases, although the sensitivity decreases. (<b>D</b>) Shows the modifications which are induced by the analysis of the M351I mutation to the meso scale pathway network depicted in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0053668#pone-0053668-g005" target="_blank">Figure 5E</a>. Black block represents induction of the protein expression by the main pathway, whereas the red block is indicating an inhibition via the main pathway. Green block represents the unique effect of NILO on the overall protein expression level.</p

    A–D: Western blot analyses revealed posttranslational modification of eIF5A and up regulation of TGM2 after treatment with IM.

    No full text
    <p>(<b>A</b>) Enlarged regions from a coomassie stained 2D-PAGE from Ba/F3-p210 cells after treatment with IM or DMSO as a control. The arrows indicate two spots for eIF5A, one at pI of 5.2 and the other one at a pI of 6.1. The latter appeared after IM treatment. (<b>B</b>) 2D-WB validated the appearance of a second spot for eIF5A at a pI of 6.2 after IM treatment. (<b>C</b>) Enlarged regions from a coomassie stained 2D-PAGE from Ba/F3-p210 cells after treatment with IM or DMSO as a control. One spot for TGM2 (arrow) demonstrated an increased expression after IM treatment. (<b>D</b>) The increased expression of TGM2 after treatment with rising concentrations of IM could be validated in human Bcr-Abl K562 cells.</p
    corecore