8 research outputs found
The efficacy of Caelyx and Hyperthermia for anticancer treatment
The efficacy of Hyperthermia and Caelyx as single modalities of therapy
in progressed and refractory cancer of different primary sites is well
known. Nevertheless, it remains question mark whether they can work
together to that direction. We have recently published a paper which
demonstrates some excellent results in treatment of recurrent breast
cancer with hyperthermia in conjunction with Caelyx and radiotherapy.
The mechanism of action of those different therapeutic options and a
review in literature are presented in this paper. Despite the limited
number of studies, they all show that the combined treatment is
effective and well tolerated. It would be interesting to mention another
treatment patent of cancer which can be done by a combination of
non-ionizing radiation and androgen deprivation. Also, combined therapy
for tumors and tumor metastases comprised administration of integrin
ligands and co-therapeutic agents have synergistic efficacy in isolated
organ perfusion. Finally, the treatment of solid tumors can be done by
glycolytic inhibitors
A novel Hemi-Body Irradiation technique using electron beams (HBIe(-))
Purpose: Certain radiation responsive skin diseases may develop symptoms
on the upper or the lower half of the body. The concept of a novel
Hemi-Body Electron Irradiation (HBIe(-)) technique, described in this
work, provides a low cost, LINAC based, intermediate treatment option in
between extremely localized and Total Skin irradiation techniques.
Materials and methods: The HBIe(-) technique, developed in our
department, incorporates a custom crafted treatment chamber equipped
with adjustable Pb shielding and a single electron beam in extended
Source-Skin Distance (SSD) setup. The patient is positioned in
‘Stanford’ technique positions. The geometrical setup provides both
optimal dose homogeneity and dose deposition up to a depth of 2 cm. To
confirm this, the following characteristics were measured and evaluated:
a) percentage depth dose (PDD) on the treatment plane produced by a
single electron beam at perpendicular incidence for six fields at
‘Stanford’ angles, b) 2D profile of the entrance dose on the treatment
plane produced by a single field and c) the total surface dose on an
anthropomorphic phantom delivered by all 6 fields.
Results: The resulting homogeneity of the surface dose in the treatment
plane for an average patient was 5-6%, while surface dose homogeneity
on the anthropomorphic phantom was 7% for both the upper and the lower
HBIe(-) variants. The total PDD exhibits an almost linear decrease to a
practical range of 2 g/cm(2).
Conclusion: In conclusion, HBIe(-) was proven effective in delivering
the prescribed dose to the target area, while protecting the healthy
skin
Clinical application of Total Skin Electron Beam (TSEB) therapy for the management of T cell cutaneous lymphomas. The evolving role of low dose (12 Gy) treatment schedule
Background & purpose: Although rare, cutaneous lymphomas represent a separate entity in hematologic oncology. T cell origin lymphomas are most common, with Mycosis Fungoides (MF) accounting for about 50–70% of cases. Sezary Syndrome (SS), which represents the leukemic varian of MF, accounts for 3% of Cutaneous T Cell Lymphomas (CTCL). Total Skin Electron Beam Therapy (TSEB) is included at the mainstream of treatment choices for CTCL. The scope of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and toxicity of two treatment schedules of TSEB. Methods and materials: We report our experience with TSEB in the management of MF and SS, as of 14 patients treated in our institution from 2011 to 2015. 8 patients received the 12 Gy (low dose) scheme while 6 patients were managed with 36 Gy (standard or full dose scheme) according to six dual field Stanford technique. The endpoints were overall response rate, duration of response and toxicity of treatment. Results: After a median follow up of 2.5 years we noted excellent treatment outcome, with both schemes being well tolerated and resulting in comparable response rates. The overall response rate for both treatment regimens was over 87.5%. Treatment was well tolerated with mild toxicity. Conclusion: The role of TSEB in the management of MF and SS is well established. The low dose TSEB schedule of 12 Gy is an effective treatment option, since therapeutic results are more than acceptable, compliance is excellent and toxicity is minimal. Moreover, the evidence that it can be repeated safely makes it more attractive than the standard 36 Gy scheme, when a patient is referred to radiation treatment according to treatment guidelines
An Exploratory Study of Radiation Dermatitis in Breast Cancer Patients
Background/Aim: Radiation dermatitis is observed in 95% of breast
cancer patients receiving radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to
explore the correlation between protein expression in tumor cells and
the risk of developing radiation dermatitis. Patients and Methods:
Breast cancer patients receiving postoperative radiotherapy were
included in this study. Tumor specimens from 122 patients were examined
by immunohistochemistry for the expression of Ki67, ataxia
telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase, hypoxia-inducible factor-1-alpha
(HIF-1a), inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), and a-glucosidase
(aGluc). The findings were correlated with the occurrence and severity
of radiation dermatitis (Radiation therapy oncology group-RTOG grading
scale), taking into consideration body weight and skin type (Fitzpatrick
system). Data were explored further via pathway and network analyses.
Results: Correlation of radiation dermatitis (RTOG scale) with the
observed increased expression of Ki67, ATM, iNOS, HIF-1a and aGluc,
failed to reach statistical significance when skin type and/or body
weight were considered. Network interactions of proteins involved in
tumor growth (Ki67, ATM) and/or affect the oxidation state of the cell
(HIF-1a, iNOS, aGluc) were revealed, that may contribute to the risk of
developing acute radiation dermatitis. Conclusion: Correlation of the
increased expression of the studied proteins and the occurrence and
severity of radiation dermatitis in women undergoing postoperative
radiotherapy, failed to reach statistical significance. Pathway and
network analyses predicted that vasodilation and angiogenesis may
contribute to radiation-induced dermatitis via mechanisms that need to
be further explored. Our strategy serves as a paradigm for coupling
histopathological data to molecular findings and network analyses for
risk assessment in the clinic
Oral Complications of Head and Neck Cancer Therapy
Current therapies for Head and Neck cancer treatment are extremely advanced. Though, they cause oral complications which have deleterious effects on basic life functions, affect oral and overall health, may lead to significant morbidity and treatment discontinuation and have an impact on survivorship and quality of life. As new therapies are introduced, a new spectrum of oral complications is rising, compromising the mucosal integrity and the salivary function, that may not be recognized, reported and treated properly. Oral complications, often permanent and extremely painful, may include mucositis, xerostomia, dysgeusia, infections, trismus and fibrosis, risk of dental disease and necrosis of the jaw, neurosensory disorders and when targeted therapies and immunotherapy are involved, aphthoid and lichenoid lesions can also be reported. Increased awareness is required for the prevention and management of these complications, which can be best provided by a multidisciplinary team