8 research outputs found

    The efficacy of Caelyx and Hyperthermia for anticancer treatment

    No full text
    The efficacy of Hyperthermia and Caelyx as single modalities of therapy in progressed and refractory cancer of different primary sites is well known. Nevertheless, it remains question mark whether they can work together to that direction. We have recently published a paper which demonstrates some excellent results in treatment of recurrent breast cancer with hyperthermia in conjunction with Caelyx and radiotherapy. The mechanism of action of those different therapeutic options and a review in literature are presented in this paper. Despite the limited number of studies, they all show that the combined treatment is effective and well tolerated. It would be interesting to mention another treatment patent of cancer which can be done by a combination of non-ionizing radiation and androgen deprivation. Also, combined therapy for tumors and tumor metastases comprised administration of integrin ligands and co-therapeutic agents have synergistic efficacy in isolated organ perfusion. Finally, the treatment of solid tumors can be done by glycolytic inhibitors

    A novel Hemi-Body Irradiation technique using electron beams (HBIe(-))

    No full text
    Purpose: Certain radiation responsive skin diseases may develop symptoms on the upper or the lower half of the body. The concept of a novel Hemi-Body Electron Irradiation (HBIe(-)) technique, described in this work, provides a low cost, LINAC based, intermediate treatment option in between extremely localized and Total Skin irradiation techniques. Materials and methods: The HBIe(-) technique, developed in our department, incorporates a custom crafted treatment chamber equipped with adjustable Pb shielding and a single electron beam in extended Source-Skin Distance (SSD) setup. The patient is positioned in ‘Stanford’ technique positions. The geometrical setup provides both optimal dose homogeneity and dose deposition up to a depth of 2 cm. To confirm this, the following characteristics were measured and evaluated: a) percentage depth dose (PDD) on the treatment plane produced by a single electron beam at perpendicular incidence for six fields at ‘Stanford’ angles, b) 2D profile of the entrance dose on the treatment plane produced by a single field and c) the total surface dose on an anthropomorphic phantom delivered by all 6 fields. Results: The resulting homogeneity of the surface dose in the treatment plane for an average patient was 5-6%, while surface dose homogeneity on the anthropomorphic phantom was 7% for both the upper and the lower HBIe(-) variants. The total PDD exhibits an almost linear decrease to a practical range of 2 g/cm(2). Conclusion: In conclusion, HBIe(-) was proven effective in delivering the prescribed dose to the target area, while protecting the healthy skin

    Clinical application of Total Skin Electron Beam (TSEB) therapy for the management of T cell cutaneous lymphomas. The evolving role of low dose (12 Gy) treatment schedule

    No full text
    Background & purpose: Although rare, cutaneous lymphomas represent a separate entity in hematologic oncology. T cell origin lymphomas are most common, with Mycosis Fungoides (MF) accounting for about 50–70% of cases. Sezary Syndrome (SS), which represents the leukemic varian of MF, accounts for 3% of Cutaneous T Cell Lymphomas (CTCL). Total Skin Electron Beam Therapy (TSEB) is included at the mainstream of treatment choices for CTCL. The scope of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and toxicity of two treatment schedules of TSEB. Methods and materials: We report our experience with TSEB in the management of MF and SS, as of 14 patients treated in our institution from 2011 to 2015. 8 patients received the 12 Gy (low dose) scheme while 6 patients were managed with 36 Gy (standard or full dose scheme) according to six dual field Stanford technique. The endpoints were overall response rate, duration of response and toxicity of treatment. Results: After a median follow up of 2.5 years we noted excellent treatment outcome, with both schemes being well tolerated and resulting in comparable response rates. The overall response rate for both treatment regimens was over 87.5%. Treatment was well tolerated with mild toxicity. Conclusion: The role of TSEB in the management of MF and SS is well established. The low dose TSEB schedule of 12 Gy is an effective treatment option, since therapeutic results are more than acceptable, compliance is excellent and toxicity is minimal. Moreover, the evidence that it can be repeated safely makes it more attractive than the standard 36 Gy scheme, when a patient is referred to radiation treatment according to treatment guidelines

    An Exploratory Study of Radiation Dermatitis in Breast Cancer Patients

    No full text
    Background/Aim: Radiation dermatitis is observed in 95% of breast cancer patients receiving radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to explore the correlation between protein expression in tumor cells and the risk of developing radiation dermatitis. Patients and Methods: Breast cancer patients receiving postoperative radiotherapy were included in this study. Tumor specimens from 122 patients were examined by immunohistochemistry for the expression of Ki67, ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase, hypoxia-inducible factor-1-alpha (HIF-1a), inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), and a-glucosidase (aGluc). The findings were correlated with the occurrence and severity of radiation dermatitis (Radiation therapy oncology group-RTOG grading scale), taking into consideration body weight and skin type (Fitzpatrick system). Data were explored further via pathway and network analyses. Results: Correlation of radiation dermatitis (RTOG scale) with the observed increased expression of Ki67, ATM, iNOS, HIF-1a and aGluc, failed to reach statistical significance when skin type and/or body weight were considered. Network interactions of proteins involved in tumor growth (Ki67, ATM) and/or affect the oxidation state of the cell (HIF-1a, iNOS, aGluc) were revealed, that may contribute to the risk of developing acute radiation dermatitis. Conclusion: Correlation of the increased expression of the studied proteins and the occurrence and severity of radiation dermatitis in women undergoing postoperative radiotherapy, failed to reach statistical significance. Pathway and network analyses predicted that vasodilation and angiogenesis may contribute to radiation-induced dermatitis via mechanisms that need to be further explored. Our strategy serves as a paradigm for coupling histopathological data to molecular findings and network analyses for risk assessment in the clinic

    Oral Complications of Head and Neck Cancer Therapy

    No full text
    Current therapies for Head and Neck cancer treatment are extremely advanced. Though, they cause oral complications which have deleterious effects on basic life functions, affect oral and overall health, may lead to significant morbidity and treatment discontinuation and have an impact on survivorship and quality of life. As new therapies are introduced, a new spectrum of oral complications is rising, compromising the mucosal integrity and the salivary function, that may not be recognized, reported and treated properly. Oral complications, often permanent and extremely painful, may include mucositis, xerostomia, dysgeusia, infections, trismus and fibrosis, risk of dental disease and necrosis of the jaw, neurosensory disorders and when targeted therapies and immunotherapy are involved, aphthoid and lichenoid lesions can also be reported. Increased awareness is required for the prevention and management of these complications, which can be best provided by a multidisciplinary team
    corecore