Cerium coatings on pristine and nanostructured Ti and Ti6Al4V surfaces: bioactivity, resistance in simulated inflammatory conditions, and antibacterial performance

Despite the significant contribution of titanium and its alloys for hard tissue regenerative medicine, some major issues remain to be solved. Implants' long-term stability is threatened by poor osseointegration. Moreover, bacterial adhesion and excessive inflammatory response are also to be considered in the design of a device intended to be integrated into the human body. Here, a cerium mixed oxide (CeOx) coating was realized on pristine and nanotubular-structured Ti and Ti6Al4V surfaces using a simple layer-by-layer drop-casting technique. Bioactivity, resistance in simulated inflammatory conditions, and bactericidal capacity were evaluated as a function of morphological surface characteristics combined with the cerium quantity deposited. The results obtained suggest that the presence of CeOx on the surfaces with nanotubes enhanced osseointegration, while on the non-nanostructured surfaces, this coating improved resistance under oxidative stress and provided excellent antibacterial properties

Evaluation of FAST COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Test Kit for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Respiratory Samples from Mildly Symptomatic or Asymptomatic Patients

Molecular tests are the gold standard to diagnose severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection but are associated with a diagnostic delay, while antigen detection tests can generate results within 20 min even outside a laboratory. In order to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the FAST COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Test Kit (Ag-RDT), two respiratory swabs were collected simultaneously from 501 patients, with mild or no coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related symptoms, and analyzed with both the Reverse Transcriptase-quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR) and the FAST COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Test. Results were then compared to determine clinical performance in a screening setting. We measured a precision of 97.41% (95% CI 92.42–99.15%) and a recall of 98.26% (95% CI 93.88–99.25%), with a specificity of 99.22% (95% CI 97.74–99.74%), a negative predictive value of 99.48% (95% CI 97.98–99.87%), and an overall accuracy of 99.00% (95% CI 97.69–99.68%). Concordance was described by a Kappa coefficient of 0.971 (95% CI 0.947–0.996). Considering short lead times, low cost, and opportunities for decentralized testing, the Ag-RDT test can enhance the efforts to control SARS-CoV-2 spread in several settings

A Peptide-Based Assay Discriminates Individual Antibody Response to the COVID-19 Pfizer/BioNTech mRNA Vaccine

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccine developed by Pfizer/BioNTech has been shown to be capable of developing an excellent antibody response against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein, with good production of neutralizing antibodies. Herein, we analyzed differences in the antibody response elicited by inoculation of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine through a peptide-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) that utilizes synthetic peptides derived from the spike protein in the immuno-adsorbent phase. Immunoreactivity against synthetic peptides was measured at different time points from vaccination and was also correlated with the SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing capacity. Our results indicate that all vaccinated subjects except one show reactive antibodies to at least one peptide at both 30 and 60 days after injection of the first dose. Only one of the 19 analyzed subjects showed no antibody response toward any of the selected peptides, consistently with a lower neutralizing capacity. More importantly, our data showed that the antibody response elicited by inoculation of the two doses of the Pfizer vaccine appears to be qualitatively individual, both in the type of recognized peptides and in the temporal persistence of the antibody response. Together with previous published data, our findings suggest that for effective pandemic control, it is important to constantly monitor the antibody protection in the population, and the assay described here could be a valid tool for this purpose

Sample-Pooling Strategy for SARS-CoV-2 Detection among Students and Staff of the University of Sannio

Since the beginning of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, it has been clear that testing large groups of the population was the key to stem infection and prevent the effects of the coronavirus disease of 2019, mostly among sensitive patients. On the other hand, time and cost-sustainability of virus detection by molecular analysis such as reverse transcriptase-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) may be a major issue if testing is extended to large communities, mainly asymptomatic large communities. In this context, sample-pooling and test grouping could offer an effective solution. Here we report the screening on 1195 oral-nasopharyngeal swabs collected from students and staff of the Università degli Studi del Sannio (University of Sannio, Benevento, Campania, Italy) and analyzed by an in-house developed multiplex RT-qPCR for SARS-CoV-2 detection through a simple monodimensional sample pooling strategy. Overall, 400 distinct pools were generated and, within 24 h after swab collection, five positive samples were identified. Out of them, four were confirmed by using a commercially available kit suitable for in vitro diagnostic use (IVD). High accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were also determined by comparing our results with a reference IVD assay for all deconvoluted samples. Overall, we conducted 463 analyses instead of 1195, reducing testing resources by more than 60% without lengthening diagnosis time and without significant losses in sensitivity, suggesting that our strategy was successful in recognizing positive cases in a community of asymptomatic individuals with minor requirements of reagents and time when compared to normal testing procedures

Human serum albumin binds spike protein and protects cells from SARS-CoV-2 infection by modulating the RAS pathway

Since the start of the pandemic, scientists have directed their research towards identifying COVID-19 risk factors and predictive elements. Numerous clinical studies have established a strong connection between hypoalbuminemia and an unfavorable prognosis for COVID-19. Here, we aim to explore the impact of human serum albumin (HSA) on SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our findings indicate that HSA plays a role in reducing the replication rate of SARS-CoV-2 in Vero E6 cells. This protective effect is due to HSA ability to bind to the S1 domain of the spike protein, effectively competing with ACE2. Moreover, we show that the protective role of HSA is dependent also on its ability to activate the protective axis within the RAS system pathway, which is responsible for inducing vasodilation and promoting anti-inflammatory, anti-fibrotic, and anti-apoptotic responses. In summary, the data presented in this study support the idea that reduced levels of circulating HSA in hypoalbuminemic patients may heighten their susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection, as the spike protein is unhindered in its ability to bind to ACE2 and penetrate human cells. Besides, hypoalbuminemia exacerbates the imbalance of the RAS pathway towards the classical “detrimental” axis. This could potentially contribute to the increased severity and elevated mortality rate observed in individuals with low levels of circulating albumin

Diagnostic issues faced by a rare disease healthcare network during Covid-19 outbreak: data from the Campania Rare Disease Registry

Background: The aims of this study were: to investigate the capacity of the rare disease healthcare network in Campania to diagnose patients with rare diseases during the outbreak of Covid-19; and to shed light on problematic diagnoses during this period. Methods: To describe the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the diagnosis of patients with rare diseases, a retrospective analysis of the Campania Region Rare Disease Registry was performed. A tailored questionnaire was sent to rare disease experts to investigate major issues during the emergency period. Results: Prevalence of new diagnoses of rare disease in March and April 2020 was significantly lower than in 2019 (117 versus 317, P < 0.001 and 37 versus 349, P < 0.001, respectively) and 2018 (117 versus 389, P < 0.001 and 37 versus 282, P < 0.001, respectively). Eighty-two among 98 rare disease experts completed the questionnaire. Diagnostic success (95%), access to diagnosis (80%) and follow-up (72%), lack of Personal Protective Equipment (60%), lack of Covid-19 guidelines (50%) and the need for home therapy (78%) were the most important issues raised during Covid-19 outbreak. Conclusions: This study describes the effects of the Covid-19 outbreak on the diagnosis of rare disease in a single Italian region and investigates potential issues of diagnosis and management during this period