MOESM5 of The role of antigen presenting cells in the induction of HIV-1 latency in resting CD4+ T-cells

Additional file 5: Table S2. Comparison of gene expression between latency inducing and non-inducing antigen presenting cell subpopulations using microarray. Using the bioinformatics databases DAVID, GeneCards and GeneCodis, gene expression compartment and function was determined. Genes expressed on the antigen presenting cell (APC)-surface with the ability to signal to T-cells were shortlisted

MOESM4 of HIV integration and the establishment of latency in CCL19-treated resting CD4+ T cells require activation of NF-ÎşB

Additional file 4: Figure S4. Integration site selection and gene activation in chemokine treated cells. A, Gene expression was determined by Illumina bead array in unactivated, CCL19-treated or PHA-IL2 activated CD4+ T cells after 6 or 72 h. The ratio of expression of genes at the sites of integration was determined in each in vitro condition. B, Expression of individual genes at the site of HIV integration in CCL19-treated resting CD4+ T cells (x-axis) compared to unactivated (y-axis; upper panel) or PHA-IL2 activated CD4+ T cells (y-axis; lower panel). C, The distance of integration sites to specific genomic elements including LINE, H4K20me3 and H4R3me following HIV infection of unactivated, CCL19-treated and PHA-IL2 activated CD4+ T cells, or CD4+ T cells from HIV-infected patients on cART or randomly selected sites. Log distance is shown as box plots (median and quartiles) with violin plot of the kernel distribution. The means are shown as a red horizontal line