14 research outputs found

    Financial work incentives for disability benefit recipients: lessons from a randomised field experiment

    No full text
    Disabled insurance (DI) beneficiaries lose benefits if labor incomes exceed certain thresholds (so called cash-cliffs ). The high implicit taxation of employment income is considered one of the prime reasons for the low outflow from the disability insurance. This paper presents the results of the short-term evaluation of a conditional cash program that financially incentivizes work related reduction of disability benefits. A randomized group of DI beneficiaries receive the offer to claim a payment ( seed capital ) of up to CHF 72,000 (USD 71,000) if they take up or expand employment and reduce DI claims. Overall, interest in taking-up the financial incentive is low at only 3%. Increasing the size of the payment does not lead to higher take-up. Individuals close to cash-cliffs react more on seed capital but the overall magnitude is small. Our results suggest that work-disincentives imposed by cash-cliffs are unlikely the main driver for low employment and outflow from the Swiss disability insurance system, despite the fact that the partial disability insurance system generates a nonlinear budget set, and bunching behavior at cash-cliffs are observed prior implementation of seed capital

    From aggregation to dispersion: how habitat fragmentation prevents the emergence of consensual decision making in a group.

    Get PDF
    In fragmented landscape, individuals have to cope with the fragmentation level in order to aggregate in the same patch and take advantage of group-living. Aggregation results from responses to environmental heterogeneities and/or positive influence of the presence of congeners. In this context, the fragmentation of resting sites highlights how individuals make a compromise between two individual preferences: (1) being aggregated with conspecifics and (2) having access to these resting sites. As in previous studies, when the carrying capacity of available resting sites is large enough to contain the entire group, a single aggregation site is collectively selected. In this study, we have uncoupled fragmentation and habitat loss: the population size and total surface of the resting sites are maintained at a constant value, an increase in fragmentation implies a decrease in the carrying capacity of each shelter. For our model organism, Blattella germanica, our experimental and theoretical approach shows that, for low fragmentation level, a single resting site is collectively selected. However, for higher level of fragmentation, individuals are randomly distributed between fragments and the total sheltered population decreases. In the latter case, social amplification process is not activated and consequently, consensual decision making cannot emerge and the distribution of individuals among sites is only driven by their individual propensity to find a site. This intimate relation between aggregation pattern and landscape patchiness described in our theoretical model is generic for several gregarious species. We expect that any group-living species showing the same structure of interactions should present the same type of dispersion-aggregation response to fragmentation regardless of their level of social complexity.Journal ArticleSCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe
    corecore