Natuur als luxe of noodzaak: natuurbeleid in beweging

Over het natuurbeleid wordt momenteel volop gediscussieerd. Wat de samenleving in de toekomst verwacht van het natuurbeleid is nog niet zo duidelijk. De wensen voor natuur lijken divers, zo blijkt bijvoorbeeld uit de progamma's van de politieke partijen. Het planbureau voor de Leefomgeving brengt samen met Wageningen UR de maatschappelijke keuzes in kaart. Daartoe zijn vanuit verschillende maatschappelijke opgaven vier oriëntaties op natuur ontwikkeld. Dit op basis van 2 verschenen publicaties: IBO natuur; Brede heroverweging leefomgeving en natuu

The “Health Benefit Basket” in The Netherlands

This contribution describes the entitlements in Dutch health care and explores how these entitlements are determined and to whom they apply. The focus is on services of curative care. No comprehensive positive or negative list of individual services is included in formal laws. Instead, the legislation states only what general types of medical services are covered and generally the “usual care” criterion determines to which interventions patients are entitled. This criterion is not very restrictive and yields local variations in service provision, which are moderated by practice guidelines. It is conceivable, however, that the recent introduction of the DBC financing system will change the reimbursement and therefore benefit-setting policy

Interference control in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder

The view that Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is associated with a diminished ability to control interfference is controversial and based exclusively on results of (verbal)-visual interference tasks, primarily the Stroop Color Word task. The present study compares medication-naïve children with ADHD (n∈=∈35 and n∈=∈51 in Experiments 1 and 2, respectively) with normal controls (n∈=∈26 and n∈=∈32, respectively) on two interference tasks to assess interference control in both the auditory and the visual modality: an Auditory Stroop task and a Simon task. Both groups showed reliable but equal degrees of interference on both tasks, suggesting that children with ADHD do not differ from normal controls in their ability to control interference in either modality. © 2008 The Author(s)

Inhibition, Reinforcement Sensitivity and Temporal Information Processing in ADHD and ADHD+ODD: Evidence of a Separate Entity?

This study compared children with ADHD-only, ADHD+ODD and normal controls (age 8–12) on three key neurocognitive functions: response inhibition, reinforcement sensitivity, and temporal information processing. The goal was twofold: (a) to investigate neurocognitive impairments in children with ADHD-only and children with ADHD+ODD, and (b) to test whether ADHD+ODD is a more severe from of ADHD in terms of neurocognitive performance. In Experiment 1, inhibition abilities were measured using the Stop Task. In Experiment 2, reinforcement sensitivity and temporal information processing abilities were measured using a Timing Task with both a reward and penalty condition. Compared to controls, children with ADHD-only demonstrated impaired inhibitory control, showed more time underestimations, and showed performance deterioration in the face of reward and penalty. Children with ADHD+ODD performed in-between children with ADHD-only and controls in terms of inhibitory controls and the tendency to underestimate time, but were more impaired than controls and children with ADHD-only in terms of timing variability. In the face of reward and penalty children with ADHD+ODD improved their performance compared to a neutral condition, in contrast to children with ADHD-only. In the face of reward, the performance improvement in the ADHD+ODD group was disproportionally larger than that of controls. Taken together the findings suggest that, in terms of neurocognitive functioning, comorbid ADHD+ODD is a substantial different entity than ADHD-only

Penny and Pound Wise: Pharmacoeconomics from a Governmental Perspective

Because of growing pressure on the healthcare budget in The Netherlands, appropriate justification of current expenditures and future investments in public healthcare are becoming increasingly important. Therefore, the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport is expanding its use of pharmacoeconomic evaluation in informed reimbursement decision-making of new pharmaceuticals. Since June 2002, pharmaceutical companies have been invited to submit a pharma-coeconomic dossier with their reimbursement applications of innovative drugs. As of January 2005 submission of a pharmacoeconomic dossier is mandatory for all drugs claiming to have therapeutic value. Currently, several European governmental and non-governmental organisations are making efforts to harmonise pharmacoeconomic research guidelines at the EU level. Ultimately, this may facilitate a more efficient way of conducting pharmacoeconomic research and encourage the use of pharmacoeconomic data by national assessment agencies and governments. It is anticipated that international pharmaceutical companies will increasingly invest in pharmacoeconomics while government staff will become more experienced in appraising the dossiers, thus resulting in an upward momentum in the quality and usability of pharmacoeconomic data. From the Dutch government's perspective, the use of pharmacoeconomic evaluation in reimbursement decision-making should offer a true opportunity for pharmaceutical companies to present the added value for money of new drugs. Using pharmacoeconomic data, costs, benefits and effects of pharmaceuticals are increasingly being considered from a societal perspective, thus going beyond the sole consideration of the impact on the pharmaceutical budget.Cost-effectiveness, Health-policy

Integrated pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of Ro 48–6791, a new benzodiazepine, in comparison with midazolam during first administration to healthy male subjects

Aims This study was performed to investigate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ascending doses of Ro 48–6791, compared with midazolam, in healthy subjects during first administration to man studies

Public funding of pharmaceuticals in the Netherlands: investigating the effect of evidence, process and context on CVZ decision-making

The College Voor Zorgverzekeringen (CVZ) provides guidance to the Dutch healthcare system on funding and use of new pharmaceutical technologies. This study examined the impact of evidence, process and context factors on CVZ decisions in 2004–2009. A data set of CVZ decisions pertaining to pharmaceutical technologies was created, including 29 variables extracted from published information. A three-category outcome variable was used, defined as the decision to ‘recommend’, ‘restrict’ or ‘not recommend’ a technology. Technologies included in list 1A/1B or on the expensive drug list were considered recommended; those included in list 2 or for which patient co-payment is required were considered restricted; technologies not included on any reimbursement list were classified as ‘not recommended’. Using multinomial logistic regression, the relative contribution of explanatory variables on CVZ decisions was assessed. In all, 244 technology appraisals (256 technologies) were analysed, with 51 %, of technologies recommended, 33 % restricted and 16 % not recommended by CVZ for funding. The multinomial model showed significant associations (p ≤ 0.10) between CVZ outcome and several variables, including: (1) use of an active comparator and demonstration of statistical superiority of the primary endpoint in clinical trials, (2) pharmaceutical budget impact associated with introduction of the technology, (3) therapeutic indication and (4) prevalence of the target population. Results confirm the value of a comprehensive and multivariate approach to understanding CVZ decision-making