Evaluating subclinical left ventricular and left atrial dysfunction in idiopathic atrial fibrillation: A speckle-tracking based strain-analysis

OBJECTIVE: A subset of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) presents without established AF risk factors and normal left ventricular (LV) systolic function, called idiopathic AF (IAF). Traditionally, echocardiography derived LV dimensions and ejection fraction (EF) are used to exclude LV dysfunction in IAF, but their sensitivity is limited. Our objective is to evaluate the presence of subtle alterations in LV function despite normal LVEF in patients with IAF compared to healthy controls, using speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) based global longitudinal strain (GLS). METHODS: Standard transthoracic echocardiography was performed in 80 patients with IAF and 129 healthy controls. Patients with overt cardiac disease as well as known established AF risk factors were excluded. STE analysis was performed to assess GLS of the LV, and left atrial strain (LAS). RESULTS: LVEF was normal and comparable between patients with IAF and healthy controls (63 ± 4% for both groups; p = 0.801). Mean GLS was within normal limits for both groups but statistically significantly more negative in patients with IAF (-20.6 ± 2.5% vs. -19.7 ± 2.5%; p = 0.016), however not when indexed for ventricular cycle length (p = 0.784). No differences in LA volume or non-indexed LAS were seen in patients with IAF compared to healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS: In this selected group of IAF patients, STE did not detect any overt LV or LA dysfunction compared to healthy controls. Thus, IAF occurred in these patients not only in the absence of established AF risk factors but also without evidence of ventricular or atrial dysfunction

Association between comorbidities and left and right atrial dysfunction in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation:Analysis of AF-RISK

BACKGROUND: To identify the association between comorbidities and left atrial (LA) and right atrial (RA) function in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study. Speckle-tracking echocardiography was performed in 344 patients with paroxysmal AF at baseline, and available in 298 patients after 1-year follow-up. The number of comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, body mass index >25 kg/m2, age > 65 years, moderate to severe mitral valve regurgitation and kidney dysfunction (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 ml/min/1.73m2)) was determined and the association with atrial strain was tested. RESULTS: Mean age of the patients was 58 (SD 12) years and 137 patients were women (40%). Patients with a higher number of comorbidities had larger LA volumes (p for trend <0.001), and had a decrease in all strain phases from the LA and RA, except for the RA contraction phase (p for trend 0.47). A higher number of comorbidities was associated with LA reservoir and conduit strain decrease independently of LA or RA volumes (p < 0.001, p < 0.001 respectively). Patients with 1-2 comorbidities, but not patients with 3 or more comorbidities, showed a further progression of impaired LA and RA function in almost all atrial strain phases at 14 (Heijman et al., 2021; Kirchhof et al., 2020; Vieira et al., 2014; Ramkumar et al., 2017; Greiser et al., 2009 [13-17]) months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with paroxysmal AF, individual and combined comorbidities are related to lower LA and RA strain. In patients with few comorbidities, impairment in atrial function progresses during one year of follow-up. Whether comorbidity management prevents or reverses decrease in atrial function warrants further study

Long-term intermittent versus short continuous heart rhythm monitoring for the detection of atrial fibrillation recurrences after catheter ablation

BACKGROUND: The utility of long-term intermittent heart rhythm monitoring after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation remains unclear. Therefore, we compared the efficacy and usability of long-term intermittent (AliveCor Kardia® (ACK)) versus short continuous (Holter) heart rhythm monitoring for the detection of AF recurrences after AF ablation and evaluated ACK accuracy to detect AF. METHODS: Patients were provided with Holter (for ≥24 h) simultaneously with an ACK (4 weeks) used three times a day and in case of symptoms. The primary endpoint was the difference in proportion of patients diagnosed with recurrent AF by ACK as compared to Holter monitoring. Secondary endpoints were the usability (System Usability Scale and a four-item questionnaire) of ACK and Holter monitoring; and the accuracy of the ACK algorithm for AF detection. RESULTS: Out of 126 post-ablation patients, 115 (91.3%; 35 females, median age 64.0 [58.0-68.0] years) transmitted overall 7838 ACK ECG recordings. ACK and Holter monitoring detected 29 (25.2%) and 17 (14.8%) patients with AF recurrences, respectively (p < 0.001). More than 2 weeks of ACK monitoring did not have additional diagnostic yield for detection of AF recurrences. Patients graded ACK higher than Holter monitoring and found ACK more convenient in daily usage than Holter (p < 0.001). Sensitivity and specificity of ACK for AF detection were 95.3% and 97.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term intermittent monitoring by ACK more effectively detects AF recurrences after AF ablation and has a higher patients' usability than short continuous Holter monitoring. ACK showed a high accuracy to detect AF

The prognostic impact of mechanical atrial dysfunction and atrial fibrillation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

AIMS: This study assessed the prognostic implications of mechanical atrial dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients with different stages of atrial fibrillation (AF) in detail. METHODS AND RESULTS: HFpEF patients (n = 258) systemically underwent an extensive clinical characterization, including 24-h Holter monitoring and speckle-tracking echocardiography. Patients were categorized according to rhythm and stages of AF: 112 with no history of AF (no AF), 56 with paroxysmal AF (PAF), and 90 with sustained (persistent/permanent) AF (SAF). A progressive decrease in mechanical atrial function was seen: left atrial reservoir strain (LASr) 30.5 ± 10.5% (no AF), 22.3 ± 10.5% (PAF), and 13.9 ± 7.8% (SAF), P < 0.001. Independent predictors for lower LASr values were AF, absence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, higher N-terminal-pro hormone B-type natriuretic peptide, left atrial volume index, and relative wall thickness, lower left ventricular global longitudinal strain, and echocardiographic signs of elevated left ventricular filling pressure. LASr was an independent predictor of adverse outcome (hazard ratio per 1% decrease =1.049, 95% confidence interval 1.014–1.085, P = 0.006), whereas AF was not when the multivariable model included LASr. Moreover, LASr mediated the adverse outcome associated with AF in HFpEF (P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Mechanical atrial dysfunction has a possible greater prognostic role in HFpEF compared to AF status alone. Mechanical atrial dysfunction is a predictor of adverse outcome independently of AF presence or stage, and may be an underlying mechanism (mediator) for the worse outcome associated with AF in HFpEF. This may suggest mechanical atrial dysfunction plays a crucial role in disease progression in HFpEF patients with AF, and possibly also in HFpEF patients without AF