Bibliometric research evaluations, Web of Science and the Social Sciences and Humanities: A problematic relationship?

Merit, Expertise and Measuremen

Discussing some basic critique on Journal Impact Factors: Revision of earlier comments

FSW - CWTS - Ou

In vitro studies of osteosarcoma: a researcher's perspective of quantity and quality

Article / Letter to editorCWT

Measuring the productivity of national R&D systems: challenges in cross-national comparisons of R&D input and publication output indicators

Article / Letter to editorCWT

Measuring the productivity of national R&D systems: challenges in cross-national comparisons of R&D input and publication output indicators

Article / Letter to editorCWT

Book reviews in humanities research evaluations

FSW - CWTS - Ou

Approaching the ‘Reward Triangle’: general analysis of the presence of funding acknowledgements and ‘peer interactive communication’ in scientific publications

FSW - CWTS - Ou

Bibliometric analysis of output and impact based on CRIS data: A case study on the registered output of a Dutch university

Merit, Expertise and Measuremen

Non-English papers decrease rankings

In applying a set of standardbibliometric indicators to rankthe scientific status of 500universities worldwide for the2010 Leiden Ranking, we havediscovered that the language ofpublication has a dramatic andlargely underestimated effect oncitation-based measurements ofresearch performance.Merit, Expertise and Measuremen