Correction to:Disc inflammation and Modic changes show an interaction effect on recovery after surgery for lumbar disc herniation (European Spine Journal, (2019), 28, 11, (2579-2587), 10.1007/s00586-019-06108-9)

In Tables 3 and 4: In the first column and row, the text reads “Mixed model test (patients with Modic changes)”. This should have been just “Mixed model”. The complete correct Tables 3 and 4 are given below

Disc inflammation and Modic changes show an interaction effect on recovery after surgery for lumbar disc herniation

Purpose: To study the interaction between Modic changes (MC) and inflammation by macrophages in the disc, in relation to clinical symptoms before and after discectomy for lumbar disc herniation. Methods: Disc tissue was embedded in paraffin and stained with haematoxylin and CD68. Subsequently, tissue samples were categorized for degree of inflammation. Type of MC was scored on MRI at baseline. Roland Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) score and visual analogue scale for back pain and leg pain separately were considered at baseline and 1-year follow-up post-surgery. Main and interaction effects of MC and inflammation were tested against clinical outcome questionnaires. In addition, this analysis was repeated in bulging and extruded discs separately. Results: Disc material and MRI’s of 119 patients were retrieved and analysed. Forty-eight patients demonstrated mild inflammation, 45 showed moderate inflammation, and 26 showed considerable inflammation. In total, 49 out of 119 patients demonstrated MC. Grade of disc inflammation did not associate with the presence of MC. At baseline, no main or interaction effects of MC and inflammation were found on the clinical scores. However, during follow-up after discectomy, significant interaction effects were found for RDQ score: Only in patients with MC at baseline, patients remained significantly more disabled (3.2 points p = 0.006) if they showed considerable disc inflammation compared to patients with mild inflammation. The additional analysis showed similar results in extruded discs, but no significant effects in bulging discs. Conclusions: An interaction effect of MC and disc inflammation by macrophages is present. Only in patients with MC, those with considerable inflammation recover less satisfactory during follow-up after surgery. Graphic abstract: These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.[Figure not available: see fulltext.]

Gadolinium Enhancement Is Not Associated With Disc Inflammation in Patients With Sciatica

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective observational histological study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability of gadolinium enhancement as a marker for inflammation by associating gadolinium enhancement findings with the degree of inflammation as measured by macrophage infiltration in disc material retrieved during disc surgery in patients with sciatica. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Disc inflammation often occurs in sciatica patients, a noninvasive tool that is used to assess disc inflammation is Gadolinium enhanced MR imaging. METHODS: Disc tissue was retrieved from patients in the Sciatica trial (N = 119), a multicenter randomized controlled trial in patients with sciatica. Disc tissue was embedded in paraffin and stained with hematoxylin and CD68. Tissue samples were categorized as mild (0-10 macrophages/cm), moderate (10-100 macrophages/cm), and considerable (>100 macrophages/cm) inflammation. Of the 119 MRIs, 96 were additionally performed with contrast-enhanced gadolinium. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients showed gadolinium enhancement of the disc herniation and 26 of the nerve root. Degree of inflammation by macrophages was not associated with gadolinium enhancement of nerve roots or herniated discs. These results did not change if the patient groups with and without Modic type 2 changes were evaluated separately. Furthermore, no associations were observed between gadolinium enhancement and presence of Modic type 2 changes. CONCLUSION: This study found gadolinium enhanced MRI findings to be unreliable as an indicator for inflammation of disc herniation or nerve root in patients with sciatica.2

Prognostic Value of Thrombus Volume and Interaction With First-Line Endovascular Treatment Device Choice

BACKGROUND: A larger thrombus in patients with acute ischemic stroke might result in more complex endovascular treatment procedures, resulting in poorer patient outcomes. Current evidence on thrombus volume and length related to procedural and functional outcomes remains contradicting. This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of thrombus volume and thrombus length and whether this relationship differs between first-line stent retrievers and aspiration devices for endovascular treatment.METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, 670 of 3279 patients from the MR CLEAN Registry (Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands) for endovascularly treated large vessel occlusions were included. Thrombus volume (0.1 mL) and length (0.1 mm) based on manual segmentations and measurements were related to reperfusion grade (expanded Treatment in Cerebral Infarction score) after endovascular treatment, the number of retrieval attempts, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and a shift for functional outcome at 90 days measured with the reverted ordinal modified Rankin Scale (odds ratio &gt;1 implies a favorable outcome). Univariable and multivariable linear and logistic regression were used to report common odds ratios (cORs)/adjusted cOR and regression coefficients (B/aB) with 95% CIs. Furthermore, a multiplicative interaction term was used to analyze the relationship between first-line device choice, stent retrievers versus aspiration device, thrombus volume, and outcomes.RESULTS: Thrombus volume was associated with functional outcome (adjusted cOR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.71-0.97]) and number of retrieval attempts (aB, 0.16 [95% CI, 0.16-0.28]) but not with the other outcome measures. Thrombus length was only associated with functional independence (adjusted cOR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.24-0.85]). Patients with more voluminous thrombi had worse functional outcomes if endovascular treatment was based on first-line stent retrievers (interaction cOR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.50-0.89]; P=0.005; adjusted cOR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.55-1.0]; P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, patients with a more voluminous thrombus required more endovascular thrombus retrieval attempts and had a worse functional outcome. Patients with a lengthier thrombus were less likely to achieve functional independence at 90 days. For more voluminous thrombi, first-line stent retrieval compared with first-line aspiration might be associated with worse functional outcome.</p