Sustained DMARD-free remission in rheumatoid arthritis – about concepts and moving towards practice

Sustained DMARD-free remission (SDFR) is the best possible outcome in RA. It is characterized by sustained absence of clinical arthritis, which is accompanied by resolution of symptoms and restoration of normal physical functioning. Therefore it's the best proxy for cure in RA. The mechanisms underlying SDFR-development are yet unidentified. Hypothetically, there are two possible scenarios. The first hypothesis is based on the concept of regaining immune-tolerance, which implies that RA-patients are similar at diagnosis and that disease-processes during the disease-course shift into a favorable direction, resulting in regaining a state in which arthritis is persistently absent. This could imply that SDFR is theoretically achievable for all RA-patients. The alternative hypothesis is that RA-patients who achieve SDFR are intrinsically different from those who cannot. This would imply that DMARD-cessation could be restricted to a subgroup of RA-patients. Since the 1990s, DMARD-discontinuation and SDFR have been increasingly studied as long-term-outcome in RA. In this review, we describe hitherto results of clinical, genetic, serological, histological and imaging studies and looked for arguments for the first or second hypothesis in both auto-antibody-positive and auto-antibody-negative RA. In auto-antibody-negative RA, SDFR is presumably restricted to a subgroup of patients with high serological-markers of inflammation at diagnosis and a rapid and sustained decrease in inflammation after treatment-start. Identifying these RA-patients could be helpful in realizing personalized-medicine. In auto-antibody-positive RA, only few patients achieve SDFR and no definite conclusions can be drawn, but data could suggest that SDFR-patients might be a subgroup with relatively low inflammation from disease-presentation onwards.</p

Advances in the genetics of rheumatoid arthritis point to subclassification into distinct disease subsets

In the past few years considerable advances have been made in the genetics of susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis (RA). For decades the HLA-DRB1 alleles were the only extensively replicated genetic factor, but more genetic risk factors have now been identified that predispose to RA. Interestingly, several of the observed genetic variants conferred risk to anticitrulline-peptide antibody (ACPA)-positive RA and two variants may be restricted to ACPA-negative RA, pointing to the need for subclassification of RA. The current manuscript reviews recently identified genetic factors predisposing to ACPA-positive RA and ACPA-negative RA. Additionally, although being scarcely explored, genetic variants affecting the severity of disease course are discussed

Response to: "does ACPA-negative RA consist of subgroups related to sustained DMARD-free remission and serological markers at disease presentation" by Masi and Fleischmann

Pathophysiology and treatment of rheumatic disease

Association of Interosseous Tendon Inflammation in the Hand With Different Early Arthritides in a 10-Year Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

Objective: Inflammation around the tendons of the hand interosseous muscles (interosseous tendon inflammation [ITI]) was recently identified on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a set of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and arthralgia. We conducted a large MRI study to assess the prevalence of ITI at diagnosis of RA and of other arthritides, as well as its relationship with clinical signs. Methods: A total of 1,205 patients presenting with various types of early arthritis between 2010 and 2020 underwent contrast-enhanced hand MRI as part of the prospective Leiden Early Arthritis Cohort. MRI was evaluated with blinding for clinical data, for ITI lateral of metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints 2–5, and for synovitis/tenosynovitis/osteitis. We assessed ITI presence at baseline per diagnosis and its relationship with clinical characteristics (ie, presence of hand arthritis, increased acute phase reactants, and local joint swelling and tenderness). Logistic regression and generalized estimating equations were used with adjustment for age and established local inflammation features (synovitis/tenosynovitis/osteitis). Results: A total of 36% of patients with early RA (n = 532) had ITI; this was similar in patients with anti–citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA)-negative RA (37%) and those with ACPA-positive RA (34%; P = 0.53). ITI occurred regularly in remitting seronegative symmetrical synovitis with pitting edema (60%) and connective tissue diseases (44%) and less frequently in undifferentiated arthritis (14%), psoriatic arthritis (14%), inflammatory osteoarthritis (8%), reactive arthritis (7%), crystal arthritis (7%), and peripheral spondylarthritis (4%). ITI occurred more often in diagnoses with frequent arthritis of the hands (P &lt; 0.001) and increased acute-phase reactants (P &lt; 0.001). Within RA, ITI occurred together with local MCP joint synovitis (odds ratio [OR] 2.4, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.7–3.4), tenosynovitis (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.8–3.3), and osteitis (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.6–3.1) on MRI. Moreover, ITI presence was associated with local MCP joint tenderness (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2–2.1) and swelling (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3–2.6), independent of age and MRI-detected synovitis/tenosynovitis/osteitis. Conclusion:ITI occurs regularly in RA and other arthritides with preferential involvement of hand joints and increased acute-phase reactants. At the MCP joint level, ITI associates independently with joint tenderness and swelling. Hence, ITI is a newly identified inflamed tissue mainly found in arthritides with particularly extensive and symptomatic inflammation.</p

Window of opportunity in rheumatoid arthritis – definitions and supporting evidence: from old to new perspectives

The therapeutic window of opportunity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is often referred to. However, some have questioned whether such a period, in which the disease is more susceptible to disease-modifying treatment, really exists. Observational studies are most frequently referenced as supporting evidence, but results of such studies are subject to confounding. In addition formal consensus on the definition of the term has never been reached. We first reviewed the literature to establish if there is agreement on the concept of the window of opportunity in terms of its time period and the outcomes influenced. Second, a systemic literature search was performed on the evidence of the benefit of early versus delayed treatment as provided by randomised clinical trials. We observed that the concept of the window of opportunity has changed with respect to timing and outcome since its first description 25 years ago. There is an ‘old definition’ pointing to the first 2 years after diagnosis with increased potential for disease-modifying treatment to prevent severe radiographic damage and disability. Strong evidence supports this concept. A ‘new definition’ presumes a therapeutic window in a pre-RA phase in which the biologic processes could be halted and RA development prevented by very early treatment. This definition is not supported by evidence, although is less well studied in trials. Some suggestions for future research in this area are made. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/