26 research outputs found
Butterfly M<sub>2</sub><sup>III</sup>Er<sub>2</sub> (M<sup>III</sup> = Fe and Al) SMMs: Synthesis, Characterization, and Magnetic Properties
The
reaction of <i>N</i>-(2-pyridylmethyl)iminodiethanol
(H<sub>2</sub>L, pmide), FeCl<sub>2</sub>·4H<sub>2</sub>O or
AlCl<sub>3</sub>·6H<sub>2</sub>O with ErCl<sub>3</sub>·6H<sub>2</sub>O and <i>p</i>-Me-PhCO<sub>2</sub>H in the ratio
of 2:1:1:4 in the presence of Et<sub>3</sub>N in MeOH and MeCN yielded
compounds [Fe<sub>2</sub>Er<sub>2</sub>(μ<sub>3</sub>-OH)<sub>2</sub>(pmide)<sub>2</sub>(<i>p</i>-Me-PhCO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>6</sub>]·2MeCN (<b>1</b>) and [Al<sub>2</sub>Er<sub>2</sub>(μ<sub>3</sub>-OH)<sub>2</sub>(pmide)<sub>2</sub>(<i>p</i>-Me-PhCO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>6</sub>]·2MeCN (<b>2</b>). These two complexes are isostructural, possessing a planar butterfly
motif with the Er<sup>III</sup> ions in the wingtip positions. Both
compounds show single molecule magnet (SMM) behavior. For the [Al<sub>2</sub>Er<sub>2</sub>] compound, the slow relaxation of the magnetization
under zero applied direct current (dc) field does not show maxima,
but the relaxation processes could be analyzed using an applied dc
field of 1000 Oe. In-depth alternating current measurements under
different dc fields on the [Fe<sub>2</sub>Er<sub>2</sub>] compound
reveals that the Fe–Fe and Fe–Er interactions speed
up the relaxation and decrease the energy barrier height of the SMM
in comparison with the [Al<sub>2</sub>Er<sub>2</sub>] case
Butterfly M<sub>2</sub><sup>III</sup>Er<sub>2</sub> (M<sup>III</sup> = Fe and Al) SMMs: Synthesis, Characterization, and Magnetic Properties
The
reaction of <i>N</i>-(2-pyridylmethyl)iminodiethanol
(H<sub>2</sub>L, pmide), FeCl<sub>2</sub>·4H<sub>2</sub>O or
AlCl<sub>3</sub>·6H<sub>2</sub>O with ErCl<sub>3</sub>·6H<sub>2</sub>O and <i>p</i>-Me-PhCO<sub>2</sub>H in the ratio
of 2:1:1:4 in the presence of Et<sub>3</sub>N in MeOH and MeCN yielded
compounds [Fe<sub>2</sub>Er<sub>2</sub>(μ<sub>3</sub>-OH)<sub>2</sub>(pmide)<sub>2</sub>(<i>p</i>-Me-PhCO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>6</sub>]·2MeCN (<b>1</b>) and [Al<sub>2</sub>Er<sub>2</sub>(μ<sub>3</sub>-OH)<sub>2</sub>(pmide)<sub>2</sub>(<i>p</i>-Me-PhCO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>6</sub>]·2MeCN (<b>2</b>). These two complexes are isostructural, possessing a planar butterfly
motif with the Er<sup>III</sup> ions in the wingtip positions. Both
compounds show single molecule magnet (SMM) behavior. For the [Al<sub>2</sub>Er<sub>2</sub>] compound, the slow relaxation of the magnetization
under zero applied direct current (dc) field does not show maxima,
but the relaxation processes could be analyzed using an applied dc
field of 1000 Oe. In-depth alternating current measurements under
different dc fields on the [Fe<sub>2</sub>Er<sub>2</sub>] compound
reveals that the Fe–Fe and Fe–Er interactions speed
up the relaxation and decrease the energy barrier height of the SMM
in comparison with the [Al<sub>2</sub>Er<sub>2</sub>] case
Butterfly M<sub>2</sub><sup>III</sup>Er<sub>2</sub> (M<sup>III</sup> = Fe and Al) SMMs: Synthesis, Characterization, and Magnetic Properties
The
reaction of <i>N</i>-(2-pyridylmethyl)iminodiethanol
(H<sub>2</sub>L, pmide), FeCl<sub>2</sub>·4H<sub>2</sub>O or
AlCl<sub>3</sub>·6H<sub>2</sub>O with ErCl<sub>3</sub>·6H<sub>2</sub>O and <i>p</i>-Me-PhCO<sub>2</sub>H in the ratio
of 2:1:1:4 in the presence of Et<sub>3</sub>N in MeOH and MeCN yielded
compounds [Fe<sub>2</sub>Er<sub>2</sub>(μ<sub>3</sub>-OH)<sub>2</sub>(pmide)<sub>2</sub>(<i>p</i>-Me-PhCO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>6</sub>]·2MeCN (<b>1</b>) and [Al<sub>2</sub>Er<sub>2</sub>(μ<sub>3</sub>-OH)<sub>2</sub>(pmide)<sub>2</sub>(<i>p</i>-Me-PhCO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>6</sub>]·2MeCN (<b>2</b>). These two complexes are isostructural, possessing a planar butterfly
motif with the Er<sup>III</sup> ions in the wingtip positions. Both
compounds show single molecule magnet (SMM) behavior. For the [Al<sub>2</sub>Er<sub>2</sub>] compound, the slow relaxation of the magnetization
under zero applied direct current (dc) field does not show maxima,
but the relaxation processes could be analyzed using an applied dc
field of 1000 Oe. In-depth alternating current measurements under
different dc fields on the [Fe<sub>2</sub>Er<sub>2</sub>] compound
reveals that the Fe–Fe and Fe–Er interactions speed
up the relaxation and decrease the energy barrier height of the SMM
in comparison with the [Al<sub>2</sub>Er<sub>2</sub>] case
Slow Magnetic Relaxation in Trigonal-Planar Mononuclear Fe(II) and Co(II) Bis(trimethylsilyl)amido ComplexesA Comparative Study
Alternating
current magnetic investigations on the trigonal-planar high-spin Co<sup>2+</sup> complexes [Li(15-crown-5)] [Co{N(SiMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>}<sub>3</sub>], [Co{N(SiMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>}<sub>2</sub>(THF)] (THF = tetrahydrofuran), and [Co{N(SiMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>}<sub>2</sub>(PCy<sub>3</sub>)] (Cy = −C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>13</sub> = cyclohexyl) reveal that all three complexes
display slow magnetic relaxation at temperatures below 8 K under applied
dc (direct current) fields. The parameters characteristic for their
respective relaxation processes such as effective energy barriers <i>U</i><sub>eff</sub> (16.1(2), 17.1(3), and 19.1(7) cm<sup>–1</sup>) and relaxation times τ<sub>0</sub> (3.5(3) × 10<sup>–7</sup>, 9.3(8) × 10<sup>–8</sup>, and 3.0(8)
× 10<sup>–7</sup> s) are almost the same, despite distinct
differences in the ligand properties. In contrast, the isostructural
high-spin Fe<sup>2+</sup> complexes [Li(15-crown-5)] [Fe{N(SiMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>}<sub>3</sub>] and [Fe{N(SiMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>}<sub>2</sub>(THF)] do not show slow relaxation of the magnetization
under similar conditions, whereas the phosphine complex [Fe{N(SiMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>}<sub>2</sub>(PCy<sub>3</sub>)] does, as recently
reported by Lin et al. (Lin, P.-H.; Smythe, N. C.; Gorelsky, S. I.;
Maguire, S.; Henson, N. J.; Korobkov, I.; Scott, B. L.; Gordon, J.
C.; Baker, R. T.; Murugesu, M. <i>J. Am. Chem. Soc.</i> <b>2011</b>, <i>135</i>, 15806.) Distinctly differing axial
anisotropy <i>D</i> parameters were obtained from fits of
the dc magnetic data for both sets of complexes. According to density
functional theory (DFT) calculations, all complexes possess spatially
nondegenerate ground states. Thus distinct spin–orbit coupling
effects, as a main source of magnetic anisotropy, can only be generated
by mixing with excited states. This is in line with significant contributions
of excited determinants for some of the compounds in complete active
space self-consistent field (CASSCF) calculations done for model complexes.
Furthermore, the calculated energetic sequence of d orbitals for the
cobalt compounds as well as for [Fe{N(SiMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>}<sub>2</sub>(PCy<sub>3</sub>)] differs significantly from the prediction
by crystal field theory. Experimental and calculated (time-dependent
DFT) optical spectra display characteristic d–d transitions
in the visible to near-infrared region. Energies for lowest transitions
range from 0.19 to 0.35 eV; whereas, for [Li(15-crown-5)][Fe{N(SiMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>}<sub>3</sub>] a higher value is found (0.66
eV). Zero-field <sup>57</sup>Fe Mößbauer spectra of the
three high-spin iron complexes exhibit a doublet at 3 K with small
and similar values of the isomer shifts (δ), ranging between
0.57 and 0.59 mm/s, as well as an unusual small quadrupole splitting
(Δ<i>E</i><sub>Q</sub> = 0.60 mm/s) in [Li(15-crown-5)][Fe{N(SiMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>}<sub>3</sub>]
Field-Induced Slow Magnetic Relaxation in the Ni(I) Complexes [NiCl(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>]·C<sub>4</sub>H<sub>8</sub>O and [Ni(N(SiMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>)(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>]
Direct current (dc) and alternating
current (ac) magnetic measurements have been performed on the three
Ni(I) complexes: [NiCl(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>], [NiCl(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>]·C<sub>4</sub>H<sub>8</sub>O, and [Ni(N(SiMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>)(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>]. Fits of the
dc magnetic data suggest an almost similar behavior of the three compounds,
which display only moderate deviations from the spin-only values.
The ac magnetic investigations reveal that the two complexes with
trigonal planar coordination[NiCl(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>]·C<sub>4</sub>H<sub>8</sub>O and [Ni(N(SiMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>)(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>]display slow magnetic
relaxation at low temperatures under applied dc fields, whereas tetrahedral
[NiCl(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>] does not. Ground and excited states
as well as magnetic data were calculated by ab initio wave function
based multi-configurational methods, including dynamic correlation
as well as spin–orbit coupling. The two trigonal planar complexes
comprise well-isolated <i>S</i> = <sup>1</sup>/<sub>2</sub> ground states, whereas two <i>S</i> = <sup>1</sup>/<sub>2</sub> states with a splitting of less than 100 cm<sup>–1</sup> were found in the tetrahedral compound
Molecular Iron(III) Phosphonates: Synthesis, Structure, Magnetism, and Mössbauer Studies
The reaction of Fe(ClO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>·6H<sub>2</sub>O with <i>t</i>-BuPO<sub>3</sub>H<sub>2</sub> or Cl<sub>3</sub>CPO<sub>3</sub>H<sub>2</sub> in the presence of an ancillary
pyrazole phenolate as a coligand, H<sub>2</sub>phpzH [H<sub>2</sub>phpzH = 3(5)-(2-hydroxyphenyl)pyrazole], afforded tetra- and pentanuclear
Fe(III) phosphonate complexes [Fe<sub>4</sub>(<i>t</i>-BuPO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub>(HphpzH)<sub>4</sub>]·5CH<sub>3</sub>CN·5CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> (<b>1</b>) and [HNEt<sub>3</sub>]<sub>2</sub>[Fe<sub>5</sub>(μ<sub>3</sub>-O)(μ-OH)<sub>2</sub> (Cl<sub>3</sub>CPO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>(HphpzH)<sub>5</sub>(μ-phpzH]·3CH<sub>3</sub>CN·2H<sub>2</sub>O
(<b>2</b>). Single-crystal X-ray structural analysis reveals
that <b>1</b> possesses a cubic double-4-ring (D4R) core similar
to what is found in zeolites. The molecular structure of <b>2</b> reveals it to be pentanuclear. It crystallizes in the chiral <i>P</i>1 space group. Magnetic studies on <b>1</b> and <b>2</b> have also been carried out, which reveal that the bridging
phosphonate ligands mediate weak antiferromagnetic interactions between
the Fe(III) ions. Magnetization dynamics of <b>1</b> and <b>2</b> have been corroborated by a Mössbauer spectroscopy
analysis
Spontaneous Resolution in Homochiral Helical [Ln(nic)<sub>2</sub>(Hnic)(NO<sub>3</sub>)] Coordination Polymers Constructed from a Rigid Non-chiral Organic Ligand
A series
of homochiral lanthanide nicotinate helical coordination
polymers [Ln<sup>III</sup>(nic)<sub>2</sub>(Hnic)(NO<sub>3</sub>)]
(Ln = Eu (<b>1</b>), Gd (<b>2</b>), Tb (<b>3</b>); Hnic = nicotinic acid) has been solvothermally synthesized using
nicotinic acid. In the resulting chains, chirality is not induced
by a chiral agent but appears spontaneously <i>via</i> intrachain hydrogen bondings.
Compounds <b>2</b> and <b>3</b> were magnetically characterized,
and luminescent properties were observed for compounds <b>1</b> and <b>3</b>
Developing a “Highway Code” To Steer the Structural and Electronic Properties of Fe<sup>III</sup>/Dy<sup>III</sup> Coordination Clusters
In the
recently established field of 3d/4f coordination cluster
(CC) chemistry several burning questions still need to be addressed.
It is clear that combining 3d and 4f metal ions within a coordination
cluster core has the potential to lead to electronic structures that
will be very difficult to describe but can also be extremely interesting.
Furthermore, understanding why certain core topologies seem to be
favored is difficult to predict. Here we show that the secondary coordination
sphere provided by the ligands influences the favored product, as
demonstrated for the compound [Fe<sub>4</sub>Dy<sub>2</sub>(μ<sub>3</sub>-OH)<sub>2</sub>(<i>n-</i>bdea)<sub>4</sub>(C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>5</sub>CO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>8</sub>]·MeCN (<b>1</b>), which has a 2Fe:2Dy:2Fe core and was made using [Fe<sup>III</sup><sub>3</sub>O(C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>5</sub>)CO<sub>2</sub>)(L)<sub>3</sub>]<sup>+</sup> as starting material plus Dy(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub> and <i>N</i>-<i>n</i>-butyl-diethanolamine
(<i>n-</i>bdeaH<sub>2</sub>), compared with the compound
made using a methyl meta-substituent (R) on the phenyl ring of the
benzoate, [Fe<sup>III</sup><sub>3</sub>O(C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>Me)CO<sub>2</sub>)(L)<sub>3</sub>]<sup>+</sup> as starting material,
which resulted in the “square-in-square” compound [Fe<sub>4</sub>Dy<sub>4</sub>(μ<sub>3</sub>-OH)<sub>4</sub>(<i>n-</i>bdea)<sub>4</sub>(O<sub>2</sub>CC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>CH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>12</sub>]·MeCN (<b>2</b>) when
using ambient conditions. Changing reaction conditions from ambient
to solvothermal leads to “double-propeller” compounds
[Fe<sub>4</sub>Dy<sub>4</sub>(μ<sub>4</sub>-O)<sub>3</sub>(<i>n-</i>bdea)<sub>3</sub>(C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>5</sub>CO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>12</sub>]·13MeCN (<b>3</b>) and [Fe<sub>4</sub>Dy<sub>4</sub>(μ<sub>4</sub>-O)<sub>3</sub>(<i>n-</i>bdea)<sub>3</sub>(O<sub>2</sub>CC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>CH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>12</sub>]·MeCN (<b>4</b>) forming with this
core, resulting irrespective of the substitution on the iron benzoate
starting material. Furthermore, compounds <b>1</b> and <b>2</b> can be transformed into compounds <b>3</b> and <b>4</b>, respectively, using a solvothermal method. Thus, compounds <b>3</b> and <b>4</b> appear to be the thermodynamically most
stable species. The factors steering the reactions toward these products
are discussed. The electronic structures have been investigated using
magnetic and Mössbauer studies. All compounds are cooperatively
coupled 3d/4f systems, with compound <b>1</b> showing single-molecule
magnet behavior
Tetranuclear and Pentanuclear Compounds of the Rare-Earth Metals: Synthesis and Magnetism
The Schiff-base proligand 4-<i>tert</i>-butyl-2,6-bis-[(2-hydroxy-phenylimino)methyl]phenol
(H<sub>3</sub>L) was prepared in situ from 4-<i>tert</i>-butyl-2,6-diformylphenol and 2-aminophenol. The proligand (H<sub>3</sub>L) was used with dibenzoylmethane (DBMH) or acetylacetone
(acacH) with lanthanides giving compounds with varying arrangements
of metal atoms and nuclearities. The tetranuclear compound {[Dy<sub>4</sub>(L)<sub>3</sub>(DBM)<sub>4</sub>][Et<sub>3</sub>NH]} (<b>1</b>) and pentanuclear compound {[Dy<sub>5</sub>(μ<sub>3</sub>-OH)<sub>2</sub>(L)<sub>3</sub>(DBM)<sub>4</sub>(MeOH)<sub>4</sub>]·4(MeOH)} (<b>2</b>) were obtained from the ligand
(L)<sup>3–</sup> and dibenzoylmethane. The tetranuclear compounds
{[Dy<sub>4</sub>(μ<sub>4</sub>-OH)(L)<sub>2</sub>(acac)<sub>4</sub>(MeOH)<sub>2</sub>(EtOH)(H<sub>2</sub>O)]·(NO<sub>3</sub>)·2(MeOH)·3(EtOH)} (<b>3</b>) and {[Ln<sub>4</sub>(μ<sub>3</sub>-OH)<sub>2</sub>(L)(HL)(acac)<sub>5</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)] (HNEt<sub>3</sub>)(NO<sub>3</sub>)·2(Et<sub>2</sub>O)} (Ln = Tb (<b>4</b>), Dy (<b>5</b>), Ho (<b>6</b>), and Tm (<b>7</b>)) resulted when the ligand (L)<sup>3–</sup> was used in the presence of acetylacetone. In the solid state structures,
the tetranuclear compound <b>1</b> adopts a linear arrangement
of metal atoms, while tetranuclear compound <b>3</b> has a square
grid arrangement of metal atoms, and tetranuclear compounds <b>4</b>–<b>7</b> have a seesaw-shaped arrangement of
metal atoms. The composition found from single-crystal X-ray analysis
of compound <b>1</b> and <b>3</b>–<b>7</b> is supported by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS).
The magnetic studies on compounds <b>1</b> suggest the presence
of weak ferromagnetic interactions, whereas compounds <b>2</b>–<b>6</b> exhibit weak antiferromagnetic interactions
between neighboring metal centers. Compounds <b>1</b>,<b> 2</b>, and <b>3</b> also show single-molecule magnet behavior
under an applied dc field
Tetranuclear and Pentanuclear Compounds of the Rare-Earth Metals: Synthesis and Magnetism
The Schiff-base proligand 4-<i>tert</i>-butyl-2,6-bis-[(2-hydroxy-phenylimino)methyl]phenol
(H<sub>3</sub>L) was prepared in situ from 4-<i>tert</i>-butyl-2,6-diformylphenol and 2-aminophenol. The proligand (H<sub>3</sub>L) was used with dibenzoylmethane (DBMH) or acetylacetone
(acacH) with lanthanides giving compounds with varying arrangements
of metal atoms and nuclearities. The tetranuclear compound {[Dy<sub>4</sub>(L)<sub>3</sub>(DBM)<sub>4</sub>][Et<sub>3</sub>NH]} (<b>1</b>) and pentanuclear compound {[Dy<sub>5</sub>(μ<sub>3</sub>-OH)<sub>2</sub>(L)<sub>3</sub>(DBM)<sub>4</sub>(MeOH)<sub>4</sub>]·4(MeOH)} (<b>2</b>) were obtained from the ligand
(L)<sup>3–</sup> and dibenzoylmethane. The tetranuclear compounds
{[Dy<sub>4</sub>(μ<sub>4</sub>-OH)(L)<sub>2</sub>(acac)<sub>4</sub>(MeOH)<sub>2</sub>(EtOH)(H<sub>2</sub>O)]·(NO<sub>3</sub>)·2(MeOH)·3(EtOH)} (<b>3</b>) and {[Ln<sub>4</sub>(μ<sub>3</sub>-OH)<sub>2</sub>(L)(HL)(acac)<sub>5</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)] (HNEt<sub>3</sub>)(NO<sub>3</sub>)·2(Et<sub>2</sub>O)} (Ln = Tb (<b>4</b>), Dy (<b>5</b>), Ho (<b>6</b>), and Tm (<b>7</b>)) resulted when the ligand (L)<sup>3–</sup> was used in the presence of acetylacetone. In the solid state structures,
the tetranuclear compound <b>1</b> adopts a linear arrangement
of metal atoms, while tetranuclear compound <b>3</b> has a square
grid arrangement of metal atoms, and tetranuclear compounds <b>4</b>–<b>7</b> have a seesaw-shaped arrangement of
metal atoms. The composition found from single-crystal X-ray analysis
of compound <b>1</b> and <b>3</b>–<b>7</b> is supported by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS).
The magnetic studies on compounds <b>1</b> suggest the presence
of weak ferromagnetic interactions, whereas compounds <b>2</b>–<b>6</b> exhibit weak antiferromagnetic interactions
between neighboring metal centers. Compounds <b>1</b>,<b> 2</b>, and <b>3</b> also show single-molecule magnet behavior
under an applied dc field