12 research outputs found

    Summary about bryophyte, land-use intensity, productivity and indicator value data.

    No full text
    <p>Mean, minimum, maximum and SE of bryophyte diversity, vascular plant species, land-use measures, aboveground vascular plant biomass, nutrient content of biomass (Caā€Š=ā€Šcalcium, Kā€Š=ā€Špotassium; Mgā€Š=ā€Šmagnesium, Pā€Š=ā€Šphosphorus; Nā€Š=ā€Šnitrogen), and mean Ellenberg indicator values for vascular plants for the two regions. Letters (<sup>a, b</sup>) indicate significant group differences between the regions.</p

    Spearman correlations of CCA-axes and environmental variables.

    No full text
    <p>Spearman correlations of CCA-axes and environmental variables (nā€Š=ā€Š83). Only significant correlations are shown. Levels of significance:</p>**<p>ā€Š=ā€Š0.0001*</p><p>ā€Š=ā€Š0.01</p><p>Factors included in CCA factors are given in bold. Further details concerning single variables are given in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0051520#pone-0051520-t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a>.</p

    Frequency distribution of bryophyte species.

    No full text
    <p>Relative frequency distribution of the species richness of all, pleurocarpous, and acrocarpous bryophyte species per 16 m<sup>2</sup> plots in grasslands (<i>n</i>ā€Š=ā€Š85).</p

    Relationship between species richness of bryophytes and vascular plants.

    No full text
    <p>Relationship between species richness of bryophytes and vascular plants (<i>n</i>ā€Š=ā€Š85; yā€Š=ā€Š0.17x - 0.15; R<sup>2</sup>ā€Š=ā€Š0.47; Fā€Š=ā€Š74.1; P<0.0001).</p

    Relationships between bryophyte species richness and intensities of land-use and productivity.

    No full text
    <p>Relationships between total bryophyte species richness and intensities of land-use practices, mean annual amount of N fertilizer [kg*ha<sup>āˆ’1</sup>*year<sup>āˆ’1</sup>]; mean annual number of cuts [Cuts*year<sup>āˆ’1</sup>] from 2006ā€“2008, aboveground community biomass of vascular plants [g*m<sup>āˆ’2</sup>], Nitrogen concentrations in biomass [[g/kg<sup>āˆ’1</sup>]], mean Ellenberg indicator values for vascular plants for nutrients (N) and for moisture (M) on 85 grassland plots.</p

    Summaries of multiple regression analyses.

    No full text
    <p>Summaries of multiple regressions of species richness of acrocarpous, pleurocarpous and all bryophytes as well as bryophyte cover on intensities of land-use procedures (Model A); aboveground biomass and their nutrient content (Model B), and mean Ellenberg indicator values for vascular plants (Model C) in the two regions. Levels of significance:</p>***<p>ā€Š=ā€Šp<0.0001;</p>**<p>ā€Š=ā€Š0.0001*</p><p>ā€Š=ā€Š0.01</p><p>Further details concerning single variables are given in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0051520#pone-0051520-t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a>.</p

    CCA-ordination of bryophyte species richness and environmental variables for stands (a) and species (b).

    No full text
    <p>CCA-ordination of bryophyte species and environmental factors in grasslands (nā€Š=ā€Š83). Stands and environmental factors (a) and species (b) of the same ordination are plotted separately to ease readability. Hainich-DĆ¼n: open circles; Schorfheide-Chorin: stars. Plots in the dotted circle are situated on either Gleyosols or Histisols. N and K are nutrient concentrations in aboveground vascular plant biomass and Ellenberg indicator values given are gained from vascular plant vegetation. Longer vectors indicate stronger correlations between variables and axes. See <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0051520#pone-0051520-t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a> for further details on single variables.</p

    Summary of ANCOVA models of isotopic abundances testing for relationships with the time since certification (only organic plots, <i>n</i>ā€Š=ā€Š21).

    No full text
    a<p>Significance levels: *** ā€Š=ā€Š<i>p</i><0.001; ** ā€Š=ā€Š0.001<<i>p</i><0.01; * ā€Š=ā€Š0.01<<i>p</i><0.05.</p><p>ā€œGrassland typeā€ ā€Š=ā€Š pasture, meadow or mown pasture.<sup>a</sup></p

    Ī“<sup>13</sup>C abundances in soil of a) organic vs. conventional grasslands and b) organic grasslands in relation to the time since certification (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub>ā€Š=ā€Šāˆ’0.70; <i>p</i><0.001).

    No full text
    <p>Letters indicate significant group differences according to ANOVA analyses (for details see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0078134#pone-0078134-t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a> & <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0078134#pone-0078134-t002" target="_blank">2</a>).</p

    Results of quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) of management types (organic vs. conventional) deduced from regionally standardized Ī“<sup>15</sup>N and Ī“<sup>13</sup>C isotopic abundances of soil and/or hay samples of grasslands.

    No full text
    <p>Results of quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) of management types (organic vs. conventional) deduced from regionally standardized Ī“<sup>15</sup>N and Ī“<sup>13</sup>C isotopic abundances of soil and/or hay samples of grasslands.</p
    corecore