12 research outputs found
Summary about bryophyte, land-use intensity, productivity and indicator value data.
<p>Mean, minimum, maximum and SE of bryophyte diversity, vascular plant species, land-use measures, aboveground vascular plant biomass, nutrient content of biomass (Caā=ācalcium, Kā=āpotassium; Mgā=āmagnesium, Pā=āphosphorus; Nā=ānitrogen), and mean Ellenberg indicator values for vascular plants for the two regions. Letters (<sup>a, b</sup>) indicate significant group differences between the regions.</p
Spearman correlations of CCA-axes and environmental variables.
<p>Spearman correlations of CCA-axes and environmental variables (nā=ā83). Only significant correlations are shown. Levels of significance:</p>**<p>ā=ā0.0001*</p><p>ā=ā0.01</p><p>Factors included in CCA factors are given in bold. Further details concerning single variables are given in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0051520#pone-0051520-t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a>.</p
Frequency distribution of bryophyte species.
<p>Relative frequency distribution of the species richness of all, pleurocarpous, and acrocarpous bryophyte species per 16 m<sup>2</sup> plots in grasslands (<i>n</i>ā=ā85).</p
Relationship between species richness of bryophytes and vascular plants.
<p>Relationship between species richness of bryophytes and vascular plants (<i>n</i>ā=ā85; yā=ā0.17x - 0.15; R<sup>2</sup>ā=ā0.47; Fā=ā74.1; P<0.0001).</p
Relationships between bryophyte species richness and intensities of land-use and productivity.
<p>Relationships between total bryophyte species richness and intensities of land-use practices, mean annual amount of N fertilizer [kg*ha<sup>ā1</sup>*year<sup>ā1</sup>]; mean annual number of cuts [Cuts*year<sup>ā1</sup>] from 2006ā2008, aboveground community biomass of vascular plants [g*m<sup>ā2</sup>], Nitrogen concentrations in biomass [[g/kg<sup>ā1</sup>]], mean Ellenberg indicator values for vascular plants for nutrients (N) and for moisture (M) on 85 grassland plots.</p
Summaries of multiple regression analyses.
<p>Summaries of multiple regressions of species richness of acrocarpous, pleurocarpous and all bryophytes as well as bryophyte cover on intensities of land-use procedures (Model A); aboveground biomass and their nutrient content (Model B), and mean Ellenberg indicator values for vascular plants (Model C) in the two regions. Levels of significance:</p>***<p>ā=āp<0.0001;</p>**<p>ā=ā0.0001*</p><p>ā=ā0.01</p><p>Further details concerning single variables are given in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0051520#pone-0051520-t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a>.</p
CCA-ordination of bryophyte species richness and environmental variables for stands (a) and species (b).
<p>CCA-ordination of bryophyte species and environmental factors in grasslands (nā=ā83). Stands and environmental factors (a) and species (b) of the same ordination are plotted separately to ease readability. Hainich-DĆ¼n: open circles; Schorfheide-Chorin: stars. Plots in the dotted circle are situated on either Gleyosols or Histisols. N and K are nutrient concentrations in aboveground vascular plant biomass and Ellenberg indicator values given are gained from vascular plant vegetation. Longer vectors indicate stronger correlations between variables and axes. See <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0051520#pone-0051520-t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a> for further details on single variables.</p
Summary of ANCOVA models of isotopic abundances testing for relationships with the time since certification (only organic plots, <i>n</i>ā=ā21).
a<p>Significance levels: *** ā=ā<i>p</i><0.001; ** ā=ā0.001<<i>p</i><0.01; * ā=ā0.01<<i>p</i><0.05.</p><p>āGrassland typeā ā=ā pasture, meadow or mown pasture.<sup>a</sup></p
Ī“<sup>13</sup>C abundances in soil of a) organic vs. conventional grasslands and b) organic grasslands in relation to the time since certification (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub>ā=āā0.70; <i>p</i><0.001).
<p>Letters indicate significant group differences according to ANOVA analyses (for details see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0078134#pone-0078134-t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a> & <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0078134#pone-0078134-t002" target="_blank">2</a>).</p
Results of quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) of management types (organic vs. conventional) deduced from regionally standardized Ī“<sup>15</sup>N and Ī“<sup>13</sup>C isotopic abundances of soil and/or hay samples of grasslands.
<p>Results of quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) of management types (organic vs. conventional) deduced from regionally standardized Ī“<sup>15</sup>N and Ī“<sup>13</sup>C isotopic abundances of soil and/or hay samples of grasslands.</p