29 research outputs found
Deprescribing interventions and their impact on medication adherence in community-dwelling older adults with polypharmacy: a systematic review
Background: Polypharmacy, and the associated adverse drug events such as non-adherence to prescriptions, is a
common problem for elderly people living with multiple comorbidities. Deprescribing, i.e. the gradual withdrawal
from medications with supervision by a healthcare professional, is regarded as a means of reducing adverse effects
of multiple medications including non-adherence. This systematic review examines the evidence of deprescribing
as an effective strategy for improving medication adherence amongst older, community dwelling adults.
Methods: A mixed methods review was undertaken. Eight bibliographic database and two clinical trials registers
were searched between May and December 2017. Results were double screened in accordance with pre-defined
inclusion/exclusion criteria related to polypharmacy, deprescribing and adherence in older, community dwelling
populations. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used for quality appraisal and an a priori data collection
instrument was used. For the quantitative studies, a narrative synthesis approach was taken. The qualitative data was
analysed using framework analysis. Findings were integrated using a mixed methods technique. The review was
performed in accordance with the PRISMA reporting statement.
Results: A total of 22 original studies were included, of which 12 were RCTs. Deprescribing with adherence as an
outcome measure was identified in randomised controlled trials (RCTs), observational and cohort studies from 13
countries between 1996 and 2017. There were 17 pharmacy-led interventions; others were led by General Practitioners
(GP) and nurses. Four studies demonstrated an overall reduction in medications of which all studies corresponded with
improved adherence. A total of thirteen studies reported improved adherence of which 5 were RCTs. Adherence was
reported as a secondary outcome in all but one study.
Conclusions: There is insufficient evidence to show that deprescribing improves medication adherence. Only 13
studies (of 22) reported adherence of which only 5 were randomised controlled trials. Older people are particularly
susceptible to non-adherence due to multi-morbidity associated with polypharmacy. Bio-psycho-social factors
including health literacy and multi-disciplinary team interventions influence adherence. The authors recommend
further study into the efficacy and outcomes of medicines management interventions. A consensus on priority
outcome measurements for prescribed medications is indicated
Development and preliminary validation of a questionnaire to measure satisfaction with home care in Greece: an exploratory factor analysis of polychoric correlations
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The primary aim of this study was to develop and psychometrically test a Greek-language instrument for measuring satisfaction with home care. The first empirical evidence about the level of satisfaction with these services in Greece is also provided.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The questionnaire resulted from literature search, on-site observation and cognitive interviews. It was applied in 2006 to a sample of 201 enrollees of five home care programs in the city of Thessaloniki and contains 31 items that measure satisfaction with individual service attributes and are expressed on a 5-point Likert scale. The latter has been usually considered in practice as an interval scale, although it is in principle ordinal. We thus treated the variable as an ordinal one, but also employed the traditional approach in order to compare the findings. Our analysis was therefore based on ordinal measures such as the polychoric correlation, Kendall's Tau b coefficient and ordinal Cronbach's alpha. Exploratory factor analysis was followed by an assessment of internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, construct validity and sensitivity.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Analyses with ordinal and interval scale measures produced in essence very similar results and identified four multi-item scales. Three of these were found to be reliable and valid: socioeconomic change, staff skills and attitudes and service appropriateness. A fourth dimension -service planning- had lower internal consistency reliability and yet very satisfactory test-retest reliability, construct validity and floor and ceiling effects. The global satisfaction scale created was also quite reliable. Overall, participants were satisfied -yet not very satisfied- with home care services. More room for improvement seems to exist for the socio-economic and planning aspects of care and less for staff skills and attitudes and appropriateness of provided services.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The methods developed seem to be a promising tool for the measurement of home care satisfaction in Greece.</p