13 research outputs found

    Antioxidant capacity and phenolic total content in 'Fuerte' avocado submitted to hydrothermal treatment

    Get PDF
    Avocados possess high nutritional value with proven effectiveness in preventing cardiovascular diseases, attributed primarily to their unsaturated fatty acids content. This fruit is also rich in carotenoids and vitamins, particularly vitamin E. This work evaluates the antioxidant capacity and total phenolic content of hydrothermally-treated Fuerte avocado. Fruits were selected and hydrothermally treated at 45oC for 5, 10, 15 and 20 min. They were then stored in a refrigerator (10 ± 1oC and 90±5% relative humidity) and evaluated over a 15-day period. The total phenolic content increased up to the sixth day of storage, and decreased thereafter, without differences between the treatments. The percentage of antioxidant capacity of the control and the hydrothermally-treated samples for 5 and 10 min increased during storage. Untreated fruits showed the highest percentage of antioxidant capacity. However, the antioxidant capacity of avocado fruits subjected to these treatments declined starting on the twelfth day of storage, possibly due to the fruits’ senescence. Hydrothermal treatments for 15 and 20 min delayed fruit senescence while the antioxidant capacity continued to increase up to the fifteenth day of storage. No significant correlation was found between antioxidant capacity and total phenolic content. The antioxidant capacity of ripe Fuerte avocado was higher than that of unripe or overripe avocado

    Refrigerated storage of the fruits of the buriti (Mauritia flexuosa L.)

    No full text
    The objective of this study was to evaluate different storage conditions to maximize the shelf-life of buriti fruits; under ambient conditions the fruits last only 2-3 days. Buriti fruits were stored refrigerated at 10, 12 and 15oC with 85±5% relative humidity, and at room temperature (23±5°C) and 60±5% relative humidity. Fruits were analyzed everythree days over a 12-day period for weight loss, respiratory activity, soluble solids, pH, titratable acidity, lipids, protein and fiber. Under the considered conditions, refrigeration at 15oC was found to give the best results

    Conservação refrigerada de carambolas em embalagens plásticas Refrigerated preservation of carambolas in plastic packagings

    No full text
    Pesquisou-se o efeito de duas embalagens (polietileno de baixa densidade - PEBD e polipropileno - Longa Vida Pak ou LVP) em relação ao controle (sem embalagem) sobre a conservação de carambolas em atmosfera refrigerada (10 ºC). Utilizou-se o planejamento fatorial inteiramente casualizado 3 x 4 x 2 (3 embalagens x 4 períodos de armazenamento x 2 repetições). As análises para acompanhamento do armazenamento foram: pH, &ordm;Brix (sólidos solúveis), acidez titulável, perda de peso, coliformes totais e fecais, bolores e leveduras. O nível de contaminação microbiológica (bolores e leveduras) foi aceitável até 21 e 28 dias para carambolas não embaladas e embaladas, respectivamente. A embalagem LVP apresentou os menores índices de contaminação. Em relação às alterações físico-químicas, não houve diferenças significativas entre as embalagens com relação a perda de peso, pH e acidez titulável e o teor de sólidos solúveis foi maior para os frutos armazenados em embalagens LVP. Os resultados globais indicam que ambas as embalagens aumentam a vida útil deste produto e que, do ponto de vista microbiológico, a embalagem LVP foi melhor que a embalagem PEBD para a preservação sob condições refrigeradas.<br>The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of two packaging materials (low density polyethylene- LPDE and polypropylene-LVP) on Averrhoa carambola L shelf-life under refrigeration. A factorial design 3 x 4 x 2 (3 packaging x 4 days of storage x 2 repetitions) was used. The fruits were analysed for pH, total soluble solids, total titrable acidity, weight loss, total and fecal coliforms, moulds and yeasts. The microbiological contamination levels (moulds and yeast) was acceptable up to 21 and 28 storage days for unpacked and packed fruits, respectively. The fruits inside LVP packaging showed lower level of contamination. The weight loss, pH and titrable acidity alterations were not significantly different between the two packagings. The total soluble solids were higher for fruits inside the LVP packaging. These global results indicate that both packagings increased the shelf-life of the product and that from a microbiological standpoint, the LVP packaging was better than the LPDE packaging for preservation under refrigerated conditions
    corecore