Survival probability and prognostic factors for breast cancer patients in Vietnam

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is becoming a public health problem in Vietnam. The mortality to incidence ratio of the disease was ranked second among the most common cancers in women. This study estimates the survival probability at 1, 3, and 5 years following diagnosis and determines prognostic factors for breast cancer mortality in Vietnam. METHODS: A survival analysis was conducted based on retrospective data from Hue Central Hospital and the Cancer Registry in Ho Chi Minh City. Using the Kaplan-Meier method, the survival probability of patients with breast cancer was estimated at 1, 3, and 5 years following diagnosis. The covariates among prognostic factors for survival time were studied using an extended Cox proportion hazards model, including time-dependent predictors. RESULTS: Overall survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years following diagnosis were 0.94, 0.83 and 0.74 respectively. Marital status, education level, stage at diagnosis, and hormone therapy were prognostic factors for mortality. For the stage at diagnosis, the relation to the risk of death for breast cancer was 1.32 (95% CI, 1.22–1.41). Married women faced a risk of death nearly 1.59 times higher than unmarried women (95% CI, 1.09–2.33). Women with higher levels of education and who received hormone therapy had approximately 10% (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.92; 95% CI, 0.89–0.96) and 80% (HR: 0.22; 95% CI, 0.12–0.41) risk reduction of death respectively, compared with those classified as illiterate and those without hormone therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The 5-year survival probability of breast cancer was lower in Vietnam than in countries with similar distributions of the stage at diagnosis. Screening programs and related support policies should be developed to increase the life expectancy of women with breast cancer in Vietnam

Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns of Staphylococcus Aureus Isolated at a General Hospital in Vietnam Between 2014 and 2021

Nguyen Van An,1,* Le Ha long Hai,2,3,* Vu Huy Luong,4,5 Nguyen Thi Ha Vinh,5,6 Pham Quynh Hoa,7 Le Van Hung,5,7 Nguyen Thai Son,1 Le Thu Hong,1 Dinh Viet Hung,8 Hoang Trung Kien,9 Minh Nhat Le,10,11 Nguyen Hoang Viet,12 Duc Hoang Nguyen,13 Ngai Van Pham,14 Ta Ba Thang,15 Tran Viet Tien,16 Le Huy Hoang17 1Department of Microbiology, Military Hospital 103, Vietnam Military Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam; 2Department of Clinical Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Medical Technology, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam; 3Department of Biochemistry, Hematology and Immunology, National Hospital of Dermatology and Venereology, Hanoi, Vietnam; 4Department of Laser and Skin Care, National hospital of Dermatology and Venereology, Hanoi, Vietnam; 5Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam; 6Department of General Planning, National hospital of Dermatology and Venereology, Hanoi, Vietnam; 7Department of Microbiology, Mycology and Parasitology, National hospital of Dermatology and Venereology, Hanoi, Vietnam; 8Department of Psychiatry, Military Medical 103, Vietnam Military Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam; 9Department of Immunology, Vietnam Military Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam; 10Tay Nguyen Institute of Science Research, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, VAST, Hanoi, Vietnam; 11Antimicrobial Resistance Research Center, National Institute of Infectious Disease, Tokyo, Japan; 12Molecular Pathology Department, Faculty of Medical Technology, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam; 13Cardiovascular Laboratories, Methodist Hospital, Merrillville, Indiana, USA; 14Medical Testing Center, Medlatec Group, Hanoi, Vietnam; 15Respiratory Center, Military Hospital 103, Vietnam Military Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam; 16Department of Infectious diseases, Military Hospital 103, Vietnam Medical Military University, Hanoi, Vietnam; 17Department of Bacteriology, National of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi, Vietnam*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Le Huy Hoang, Department of Bacteriology, National of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi, 100000, Vietnam, Tel + 84 977 803 986, Email [email protected]: Staphylococcus aureus is a commensal bacteria species that can cause various illnesses, from mild skin infections to severe diseases, such as bacteremia. The distribution and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) pattern of S. aureus varies by population, time, geographic location, and hospital wards. In this study, we elucidated the epidemiology and AMR patterns of S. aureus isolated from a general hospital in Vietnam.Methods: This was a cross-sectional study. Data on all S. aureus infections from 2014 to 2021 were collected from the Microbiology department of Military Hospital 103, Vietnam. Only the first isolation from each kind of specimen from a particular patient was analyzed using the Cochran–Armitage and chi-square tests.Results: A total of 1130 individuals were diagnosed as S. aureus infection. Among them, 1087 strains were tested for AMR features. Most patients with S. aureus infection were in the age group of 41– 65 years (39.82%). S. aureus isolates were predominant in the surgery wards, and pus specimens were the most common source of isolates (50.62%). S. aureus was most resistant to azithromycin (82.28%), erythromycin (82.82%), and clindamycin (82.32%) and least resistant to teicoplanin (0.0%), tigecycline (0.16%), quinupristin-dalfopristin (0.43%), linezolid (0.62%), and vancomycin (2.92%). Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and multidrug-resistant (MDR) S. aureus were prevalent, accounting for 73.02% and 60.90% of the total strains respectively, and the strains isolated from the intensive care unit (ICU) had the highest percentage of multidrug resistance (77.78%) among the wards.Conclusion: These findings highlight the urgent need for continuous AMR surveillance and updated treatment guidelines, particularly considering high resistance in MRSA, MDR strains, and ICU isolates. Future research focusing on specific resistant populations and potential intervention strategies is crucial to combat this rising threat.Keywords: Staphylococcus aureus, antimicrobial resistance, methicillin-resistant S. aureus, multidrug resistance, Hanoi, Vietna