CHD1 Remodels Chromatin and Influences Transient DNA Methylation at the Clock Gene frequency

Circadian-regulated gene expression is predominantly controlled by a transcriptional negative feedback loop, and it is evident that chromatin modifications and chromatin remodeling are integral to this process in eukaryotes. We previously determined that multiple ATP–dependent chromatin-remodeling enzymes function at frequency (frq). In this report, we demonstrate that the Neurospora homologue of chd1 is required for normal remodeling of chromatin at frq and is required for normal frq expression and sustained rhythmicity. Surprisingly, our studies of CHD1 also revealed that DNA sequences within the frq promoter are methylated, and deletion of chd1 results in expansion of this methylated domain. DNA methylation of the frq locus is altered in strains bearing mutations in a variety of circadian clock genes, including frq, frh, wc-1, and the gene encoding the frq antisense transcript (qrf). Furthermore, frq methylation depends on the DNA methyltransferase, DIM-2. Phenotypic characterization of Δdim-2 strains revealed an approximate WT period length and a phase advance of approximately 2 hours, indicating that methylation plays only an ancillary role in clock-regulated gene expression. This suggests that DNA methylation, like the antisense transcript, is necessary to establish proper clock phasing but does not control overt rhythmicity. These data demonstrate that the epigenetic state of clock genes is dependent on normal regulation of clock components

Molecular mechanism of suppression of circadian rhythms by a critical stimulus

Circadian singularity behavior (also called suppression of circadian rhythms) is a phenomenon characterized by the abolishment of circadian rhythmicities by a critical stimulus. Here we demonstrate that both temperature step up and light pulse, stimuli that activate the expression of the Neurospora circadian clock gene frequency (frq), can trigger singularity behavior in this organism. The arrhythmicity is transient and is followed by the resumption of rhythm in randomly distributed phases. In addition, we show that induction of FRQ expression alone can trigger singularity behavior, indicating that FRQ is a state variable of the Neurospora circadian oscillator. Furthermore, mutations of frq lead to changes in the amplitude of FRQ oscillation, which determines the sensitivity of the clock to phase-resetting cues. Our results further suggest that the singularity behavior is due to the loss of rhythm in all cells. Together, these data suggest that the singularity behavior is due to a circadian negative feedback loop driven to a steady state after the critical treatment. After the initial arrhythmicity, cell populations are then desynchronized

Transcriptional interference by antisense RNA is required for circadian clock function.

Eukaryotic circadian oscillators consist of negative feedback loops that generate endogenous rhythmicities(1). Natural antisense RNAs are found in a wide range of eukaryotic organisms(2-5). Nevertheless, the physiological importance and mode of action of most antisense RNAs is not clear(6-9). frequency (frq) encodes a component of the Neurospora core circadian negative feedback loop which was thought to generate sustained rhythmicity(10). Transcription of qrf, the long non-coding frq antisense RNA, is light induced, and its level oscillates in antiphase to frq sense RNA(3). Here we show that qrf transcription is regulated by both light-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Light-dependent qrf transcription represses frq expression and regulates clock resetting. qrf expression in the dark, on the other hand, is required for circadian rhythmicity. frq transcription also inhibits qrf expression and surprisingly, drives the antiphasic rhythm of qrf transcripts. The mutual inhibition of frq and qrf transcription thus forms a double negative feedback loop that is interlocked with the core feedback loop. Genetic and mathematical modeling analyses indicate that such an arrangement is required for robust and sustained circadian rhythmicity. Moreover, our results suggest that antisense transcription inhibits sense expression by mediating chromatin modifications and premature transcription termination. Together, our results established antisense transcription as an essential feature in a circadian system and shed light on the importance and mechanism of antisense action