Fig. 1 in Eudiaptomus transylvanicus and E. vulgaris (Copepoda: Calanoida: Diaptomidae): comparative morphology, distribution and ecology

Fig. 1. Eudiaptomus transylvanicus (Daday, 1891), female. a – habitus, lateral view; b – genital compound somite; c, c′ – mandible; d – rostrum; e – endopod of leg 2, with Schmeilsche lobus; f – leg 5; g – exopods 2 and 3 of leg 5; h – endopod of leg 5. Scale bars: 0.5 mm (a), 200 µm (b), 50 µm (c, e), 40 µm (d, g), 10 µm (c′, f, h).Published as part of <i>Podshivalina, V.N., Sheveleva, N.G., Semenova, A.S. & Mirabdullayev, I.M., 2022, Eudiaptomus transylvanicus and E. vulgaris (Copepoda: Calanoida: Diaptomidae): comparative morphology, distribution and ecology, pp. 42-54 in Zoosystematica Rossica 31 (1)</i> on page 45, DOI: 10.31610/zsr/2022.31.1.42, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10124251">http://zenodo.org/record/10124251</a&gt

Fig. 4 in Eudiaptomus transylvanicus and E. vulgaris (Copepoda: Calanoida: Diaptomidae): comparative morphology, distribution and ecology

Fig. 4. Eudiaptomus vulgaris (Schmeil, 1898), male. a – habitus, lateral view; b – ultimate segments of right antennule; c – leg 5; d – right leg 5 (coxa and basis) and left leg 5; e – rostrum. Scale bars: 0.5 mm (a), 200 µm (c), 300 µm (b), 50 µm (d, e).Published as part of <i>Podshivalina, V.N., Sheveleva, N.G., Semenova, A.S. & Mirabdullayev, I.M., 2022, Eudiaptomus transylvanicus and E. vulgaris (Copepoda: Calanoida: Diaptomidae): comparative morphology, distribution and ecology, pp. 42-54 in Zoosystematica Rossica 31 (1)</i> on page 50, DOI: 10.31610/zsr/2022.31.1.42, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10124251">http://zenodo.org/record/10124251</a&gt

Fig. 2 in Eudiaptomus transylvanicus and E. vulgaris (Copepoda: Calanoida: Diaptomidae): comparative morphology, distribution and ecology

Fig. 2. Eudiaptomus transylvanicus (Daday, 1891), male. a – habitus, ventral view; b, b′ – right antennule; c – rostrum; d – leg 5; e – basis of right leg 5; f – exopod 2 of right leg 5; g – endopod of right leg 5; h – exopod 2 of left leg 5. Scale bars: 500 µm (a), 200 µm (b), 100 µm (b′, c, d), 40 µm (e), 30 µm (f), 20 µm (g, h).Published as part of <i>Podshivalina, V.N., Sheveleva, N.G., Semenova, A.S. & Mirabdullayev, I.M., 2022, Eudiaptomus transylvanicus and E. vulgaris (Copepoda: Calanoida: Diaptomidae): comparative morphology, distribution and ecology, pp. 42-54 in Zoosystematica Rossica 31 (1)</i> on page 46, DOI: 10.31610/zsr/2022.31.1.42, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10124251">http://zenodo.org/record/10124251</a&gt

Fig. 3 in Eudiaptomus transylvanicus and E. vulgaris (Copepoda: Calanoida: Diaptomidae): comparative morphology, distribution and ecology

Fig. 3. Eudiaptomus vulgaris (Schmeil, 1898), female. a – habitus, ventral view; b – genital compound somite; c – rostrum; d – mandible; e – coxa of leg 5; f – exopod 1 and endopod of leg 5; g – leg 5; h – exopods 2 and 3 of leg 5; i – endopod of leg 2, with Schmeilsche lobus. Scale bars: 0.5 mm (a), 100 µm (b), 50 µm (c, e, f, g, h, i), 20 µm (d).Published as part of <i>Podshivalina, V.N., Sheveleva, N.G., Semenova, A.S. & Mirabdullayev, I.M., 2022, Eudiaptomus transylvanicus and E. vulgaris (Copepoda: Calanoida: Diaptomidae): comparative morphology, distribution and ecology, pp. 42-54 in Zoosystematica Rossica 31 (1)</i> on page 48, DOI: 10.31610/zsr/2022.31.1.42, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10124251">http://zenodo.org/record/10124251</a&gt