Clinical experience of using oncotype DX as an additional treatment decision tool in early breast cancer - A retrospective analysis from 5 Greek institutions

Aims: The objective of this retrospective study was to describe the results from five institutions’ experience of using Oncotype DX (R) to identify patients who need chemotherapy despite the presence of primarily favorable characteristics. Patients and methods: Oncotype DX was performed in 106 pre- and postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, early breast cancer with a combination of favorable prognostic factors or favorable prognostic factors with at least one unfavorable characteristic (tumor size >2 cm, tumor grading of II-III, Ki-67 >= 10%, presence of lymph node micrometastases) in which it was unclear whether hormonal therapy only or chemotherapy plus hormonal therapy was the optimal adjuvant treatment. Results: Sixty-four (60.4%) women had Recurrence Score (RS) values < 18, 29(27.4%) intermediate RS values of 18-30, and 13 (12.3%) high RS values of >= 31. Tumor size, grading and presence of micrometastases were not associated with the RS. There was a significant association between Recurrence Score and the number of unfavorable characteristics as a categorical but not as a continuous variable. High Recurrence Scores were predictive of high Ki-67 but the converse was not true. Overall, 29 of 106 (27.4%) patients received chemotherapy because of an intermediate or a high Recurrence Score. Conclusion: The Recurrence Score helped in treatment decision-making for estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative patients with favorable characteristics or an intermediate risk of recurrence due to the presence of at least one unfavorable factor. The results of the 21-gene assay increased the likelihood for patients with intermediate clinical and histopathological risk factors receiving chemotherapy. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved

Lipid changes in breast cancer patients on exemestane treatment: Final results of the TEAM Greek substudy

Background: The Greek substudy of the Tamoxifen and Exemestane Adjuvant Multicenter International trial compared the effect of exemestane on the lipid profile of postmenopausal, breast cancer patients to that of tamoxifen in the adjuvant setting. Patients and methods: Lipidemic profile changes were studied in 142 postmenopausal patients randomized to receive either adjuvant exemestane (n = 77) or tamoxifen (n = 65). Total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and serum triglyceride (TRG) levels were measured at baseline and then every 3 months for the first 12 months of treatment and at 18 and 24 months. Results: A trend for a reduction in TC was found in both treatment arms; however, TC and LDL levels were consistently and significantly decreased in tamoxifen arm only. The mean HDL level was higher for the tamoxifen arm compared with the exemestane arm across time. No significant trend was detected throughout the study period on TRG levels on either arm. Conclusions: Unlike tamoxifen's beneficial effect on TC and LDL levels, exemestane appears to have a neutral effect on lipidemic profile of postmenopausal, breast cancer patients. These data offer additional information with regard to the safety and tolerability of exemestane treatment in the adjuvant setting. © The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved

The effect of exemestane on the lipidemic profile of postmenopausal early breast cancer patients: Preliminary results of the TEAM Greek sub-study

Introduction. Long-term endocrine therapy for breast cancer may have clinical implications as drugs that potentially alter the lipid profile may increase the risk of developing cardiovascular disease. In this study, a companion sub-protocol to the TEAM (Tamoxifen and Exemestane Adjuvant Multicenter) International trial, we compared the effect of the steroidal aromatase inactivator exemestane on the lipid profile of postmenopausal women with early breast cancer in the adjuvant setting to that of tamoxifen. Patients and methods. In this open-label, randomized, parallel group study, 176 postmenopausal patients with estrogen and/or progesterone receptor positive early breast cancer were randomized to either adjuvant exemestane (25 mg/day; n = 90) or tamoxifen (20 mg/day; n = 86). Assessments of total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and serum triglycerides (TRG) were performed at baseline and every 3 months for the first 12 months. Results. Serum triglyceride levels were consistently increased above baseline throughout the study in the tamoxifen arm, while there was a trend towards reduction in the exemestane arm. There was also an overall trend for tamoxifen to decrease the levels of LDL throughout the study period. Exemestane did not demonstrate any other significant change in HDL levels; however, there was a consistent trend for a reduction in total cholesterol in both treatment arms. The atherogenic risk determined by the TC:HDL ratio remained stable in both arms throughout the treatment period. Conclusions. Exemestane appears to have a neutral effect on total cholesterol and HDL levels. Unlike tamoxifen's positive effect on LDL levels, exemestane does not significantly alter LDL levels. Tamoxifen on the other hand increases triglyceride levels, while exemestane results in a beneficial reduction in TRG levels. These data offer additional information with regard to the safety and tolerability of exemestane in postmenopausal breast cancer patients and support further investigation of its potential usefulness in the adjuvant setting. © Springer 2005

Extended adjuvant hormonal therapy with exemestane has no detrimental effect on the lipid profile of postmenopausal breast cancer patients: Final results of the ATENA lipid substudy

Introduction: Extended adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer with aromatase inhibitors may potentially alter the lipid profile of postmenopausal patients and thus increase the risk of developing cardiovascular disease. In this study, a subprotocol of the ATENA (Adjuvant post-Tamoxifen Exemestane versus Nothing Applied) trial, we compared the effect of the steroidal aromatase inactivator exemestane on the lipid profile of postmenopausal patients with operable breast cancer, in the adjuvant setting, with that of observation alone after completion of 5 to 7 years of primary treatment with tamoxifen.Methods: In this open-label, randomized, parallel-group study, 411 postmenopausal patients with operable breast cancer, who had been treated with tamoxifen for 5 to 7 years, were randomized to either 5 additional years of exemestane (25 mg/day; n = 211) or observation only (n = 200). Assessments of total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and total serum triglycerides (TRG) were performed at baseline and then during each follow-up visit, performed at either 6 or 12 months, according to the center's clinical practice, until completing 24 months in the study.Results: TC and LDL levels increased significantly across time for both arms; TC increase was more pronounced for the observation arm, and that was sustained up to 24 months. HDL levels decreased significantly across time for the exemestane arm, whereas no significant change was detected across time for the observation arm. Triglyceride levels decreased significantly across time on both arms, with no difference detected in changes from baseline between the exemestane and the observation arms.Conclusions: Exemestane lacks the beneficial effect of tamoxifen on lipids; however, sequential adjuvant treatment with exemestane in postmenopausal breast cancer patients after cessation of 5 to 7 years of tamoxifen does not appear to alter the lipid profile significantly compared with that of an observational arm.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT00810706. © 2009 Markopoulos et al.; Licensee BioMed Central Ltd

Management of anastrozole-induced bone loss in breast cancer patients with oral risedronate: Results from the ARBI prospective clinical trial

Introduction: The aim of this multicenter, phase III, prospective open label clinical trial was to investigate the effect of risedronate (R) on bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal, early breast cancer (BC) patients scheduled to receive anastrozole (A).Methods: Pre-treatment BMD of 213 patients with hormone receptor-positive BC was evaluated at lumbar spine (LS) and hip (HP). Patients were categorized according to their baseline BMD T-score as being at low, moderate and high risk of osteoporosis. Low risk patients received anastrozole only (A), moderate risk were randomized to anastrozole +/- risedronate (A+/-R) administration and high risk patients received anastrozole + risedronate (A+R). Anastrozole was given at a dosage of 1 mg/day while oral risedronate was given at 35 mg/week. BMD was then assessed at 12 and 24 months. All patients received daily supplements of calcium (1000 mg/day) and vitamin D (400 IU/day).Results: At 24 months, in the moderate risk group, treatment with A+R resulted in a significant increase in BMD at LS and HP compared to treatment with A only (5.7% v -1.5%, Wilcoxon test P = 0.006, and 1.6% v -3.9% Wilcoxon test P = 0.037, respectively), while no significant difference was found at 12 months; 24.3% of the patients moved to normal BMD region. In the high risk group, a significant increase for LS was detected both at 12 and 24 months (6.3% and 6.6%, P < 0.001) but not for HP; BMD in 14% of patients improved to the osteopenic region. In the low risk group, a significant decrease of BMD was detected at 12 months for LS and HP (-5.3% P < 0.001 and -2.4% P < 0.001, respectively,); at 24 months, a significant decrease of BMD was detected only for LS (-2.5%, P < 0.001). However, 22% of patients became osteopenic and only 4% became osteoporotic.Conclusions: The addition of oral risedronate in post-menopausal breast cancer patients receiving anastrozole has a favorable effect on BMD. Patients with pre-treatment osteopenic to osteoporotic status should be treated with a combination of both therapies in order to avoid bone loss induced by aromatase inhibition. Patients with normal BMD before starting treatment with anastrozole have a very low risk to develop osteoporosis.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00809484. © 2010 Markopoulos et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd