Safety and efficacy of filgotinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: final results of the DARWIN 3 long-term extension study

Objectives DARWIN 3 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02065700) assessed the safety and efficacy of filgotinib in a long-term extension (LTE) of two phase II randomised controlled rheumatoid arthritis (RA) trials. Methods Eligible patients completing the 24-week DARWIN 1 (filgotinib plus methotrexate) and DARWIN 2 (filgotinib monotherapy) trials could enrol. Patients received filgotinib 200 mg/day, except 15 men who received filgotinib 100 mg/day. The primary endpoints were safety and tolerability, which were assessed by the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Safety and efficacy analyses included all enrolled patients who received ≥1 dose of filgotinib in DARWIN 3. Results 739 patients entered the LTE. The total patient-years of exposure (PYE) to filgotinib was 3706.3 years; the mean exposure duration was 259.8 weeks. 497 patients (67.3%) discontinued prematurely (including 266 TEAEs and 172 withdrawals due to the patient’s decision or ‘sponsor request’). Overall exposure-adjusted incidence rate (EAIR) was 67 (95% CI 62 to 72.2)/100 PYE for TEAEs and 3.8 (95% CI 3.2 to 4.5)/100 PYE for serious TEAEs. EAIR of infections was 23.3 (95% CI 21.2 to 25.6)/100 PYE, 1.3 (95% CI 0.9 to 1.7)/100 PYE for serious infections and 1.3 (95% CI 0.9 to 1.7)/100 PYE for herpes zoster. EAIRs of major adverse cardiovascular events (0.19 (95% CI 0.8 to 0.39)/100 PYE) and malignancies (0.6 (95% CI 0.4 to 0.9)/100 PYE) were low. Disease response assessed using non-responder imputation plateaued at LTE week 12 before slowly declining over time, with overall American College of Rheumatology (ACR)20/50/70 response rates of 26.9%/20.2%/14.7% at week 396. Conclusion Filgotinib was well tolerated in patients with RA for up to 8 years. Safety and efficacy profiles were maintained in patients previously receiving either filgotinib plus methotrexate or filgotinib monotherapy

Patient and clinical characteristics of heart failure patients concomitantly prescribed SGLT2 inhibitors and sacubitril/valsartan, a database cohort study using the Optum electronic health record data

Abstract Background and purpose Sacubitril/valsartan (sac/val), an angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor, reduces the risk for cardiovascular (CV) death or hospitalization for heart failure (HF) in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are approved in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and have shown to reduce the CV risk in T2D patients with established CV or at risk of CV disease. The SGLT2i dapagliflozin has shown to improve outcomes in patients with chronic HFrEF, with or without T2D, when used in addition to standard of care including sac/val. As the use of SGLT2i in HF evolves, and given the large overlap of HF and T2D populations, it is of interest to understand the population with concomitant use of sac/val and SGLT2i. This study describes the clinical characteristics of patients treated concomitantly with sac/val and SGLT2i or concomitantly with sac/val and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1), two comparable second line anti-diabetic drug classes. Methods This retrospective non-interventional study describes two mutually exclusive adult patient cohorts diagnosed with HF and T2D concomitantly prescribed sac/val and SGLT2i (cohort 1), or concomitantly prescribed sac/val and DDP4i/GLP1 (cohort 2). The index date was defined as the first date of concomitant use with prescriptions overlapping a minimum of 21 days. Patients were identified any time between 1/1/2015 and 30/6/2019 in the Optum® de-identified electronic health record (EHR) data from providers across the continuum of care. Results 2.3 million HF patients were identified, and 41.6% had a T2D diagnosis. 560 patients were concomitantly prescribed sac/val and SGLT2i (cohort 1) and 1,566 concomitantly sac/val and DDP4/GLP1 (cohort 2). There was a higher proportion of females in cohort 2 (35.0% vs 27.9%). Mean age was higher in cohort 2 (66.4 vs 61.4 years). The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 85.93 (SD 23.43) ml/min/1.73m2 (cohort 1) and 72.10 (Std. 27.11) ml/min/1.73m2 (cohort 2). The proportion of stage 3 CKD (&amp;lt;60 to &amp;gt;30 ml/min/1.73m2) was 11.8% (cohort 1) and 24.4% (cohort 2). Mean systolic blood pressure was similar, 120 mmHg (cohort 1) and 122 mmHg (cohort 2). Mean hemoglobin was 13.60 g/dl (cohort 1) and 12.43 g/dl (cohort 2). Median (IQR) NT-proBNP differed between the two cohorts, 914 (2154) pg/ml (cohort 1) and 2,290 (5,301) pg/ml (cohort 2) but with complete values available in only 17.7 and 19.0% of each cohort. Conclusions This descriptive analysis of concomitant prescription of sac/val and SGLT2i or DPP4/GLP1 highlights differences in the clinical characteristics between the two cohorts. The patients treated with sac/val and SGLT2i start with a more favorable clinical profile compared to the patients treated with sac/val and DPP4/GLP1. Further analyses are needed to determine if these differences are driven by age, gender or other factors. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Novartis Pharma AG </jats:sec

Effectiveness of contact-based education for reducing mental illness-related stigma in pharmacy students

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>A strategy for reducing mental illness-related stigma in health-profession students is to include contact-based sessions in their educational curricula. In such sessions students are able to interact socially with a person that has a mental illness. We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of this strategy in a multi-centre study of pharmacy students.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The study was a randomized controlled trial conducted at three sites. Because it was necessary that all students receive the contact-based sessions, the students were randomized either to an early or late intervention, with the late intervention group not having participated in the contact-based education at the time when the primary outcome was assessed. The primary outcome, stigma, was assessed using an attitudes scale called the Opening Minds Survey for Health Care Providers (OMS-HC).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We initially confirmed that outcomes were homogeneous across study centres, centre by group interaction, p = 0.76. The results were pooled across the three study centres. A significant reduction in stigma was observed in association with the contact-based sessions (mean change 4.3 versus 1.5, t=2.1, p=0.04). The effect size (Cohen’s d) was 0.45. A similar reduction was seen in the control group when they later received the intervention.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Contact-based education is an effective method of reducing stigma during pharmacy education. These results add to a growing literature confirming the effectiveness of contact-based strategies for stigma reduction in health profession trainees.</p