Soil ants.

Between July 1997 and March 1999 ants of soil and litter were taken every three months with core samplers (21cm ø) in a primary rain forest, a secondary forest and two different systems of polycultures in central Amazonia (Brazil) and extracted in Berlese funnels. Greatest generic diversity wasfound in pirmary forest, while in secondary forest and the two polycultures it was about 20% and 30% lower, respectively. Biomass and median density of ants were also highest in primary forest followed by secondary forest and one of the polyculture, whereas the lowest number and biomass of ants was found in the second polyculture. The predatory species of Hypoponera reresented the biggest part of ant biomass in all areas (20%-30%), whereas the very abundant mostly tiny species (<2mm) of Solenopsis made up only 1,4%-3,9% of the ant biomass.Final Report 1996-1999

Soil fauna and litter decomposition in primary and secondary forests and a mixed culture system in Amazonia.

Este relatório representa um relato das atividades efetuadas no segundo ano do projeto como também dos resultados obtidos dos dados de 1997-1998 e da primeira serie de experimentos de decomposição com sacos de liteira (serrapilheira). Baseado nos resultados ainda preliminares, as áreas de estudo podem ser organizadas numa série, começando da área de floresta primária FLO via um dos locais de plantação, POC, até o local de floresta secundária, SEC, e o segundo local de plantação, POA.bitstream/item/201401/1/Soil-Fauna-And-Litter-Decomposition-in-Primary...-1998.pdfSHIFT ENV 52. Annual Report 1998

Litter production, litter stocks and decomposition coefficients in a central Amazonian rain forest, a secondary forest and agroforestry systems.

Fine litter fall and stocks were determined from July 1997 to March 1999 in an area of primary rain forest (FLO), a 13-year old secondary forest (SEC), and two polyculture systems (agroforestry; POA and POC) in central Amazonia Brazil.Final Report 1996-1999

Microclimate 1997-1999 in primary forest, secondary forest and agroforestry systems in central Amazonia.

Rainfall, average maximum and minimum air temperature, and relative air humidity as measured at the Embrapa weather station all show that 1997 was a strong El Nino (ENSO) year.bitstream/item/181106/1/ID-5199-34-49.pdfFinal Report 1996-1999

Organic matter in termite mounds of an Amazonian rain forest.

This study investigates how termites alter the organic matter in rain forests near Manaus, Brazil. Samples were collected from the outer and inner parts of typical termite nests of Nasutitermes, Termes, Embiratermes, Cornitermes, Anoplotermes, and Constrictotermes genera, as well as from the surrounding topsoil (0cm-10cm) and potential wooden food. The termite nests were signficant sinks for organic matter and its associated nutrients. The organic C contents ranged between 100g kg-1 and 500g kg-1 in the nests, compared to 17g kg-1 to 42g kg-1 in the surrounding topsoils. As lignin contents of the mounds were higher than in wood, lignin may be accumulated in preference to other organic compounds. This findings also sugests that the interior part of the nests is a region of higher organic matter turnover and lignin degradation

Soil termites in a rainforest, a secondary forest and mixed-culture plantation sites in central Amazonia.

Soil termites have been studied in detail in a rain forest, a secondary forest and two agroforestry plantation sites at the Embrapa Amazonia Ocidental, Manaus-AM (Brasil), using soil (0 cm-5 cm) and litter samples taken at random within the study sites, using a soilsampler of 21 cm diameter. As results is presented a list of termite genus diversity, then compare termite biomass and individuals numbers in litter and in soil at the different sites, and discuss possible factors that determine termite distribution in the field

Structure and function of soil fauna communities in Amazonian anthropogenic and natural ecosystems.

The aim of our study was to judge the soil biological conditions in the plantations with regard to the aspired sustainability of agricultural and forestry systems

Independent data for transparent monitoring of greenhouse gas emissions from the land use sector – What do stakeholders think and need?

The agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU) sectors contribute substantially to the net global anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. To reduce these emissions under the Paris Agreement, effective mitigation actions are needed that require engagement of multiple stakeholders. Emission reduction also requires that accurate, consistent and comparable datasets are available for transparent reference and progress monitoring. Availability of free and open datasets and portals (referred to as independent data) increases, offering opportunities for improving and reconciling estimates of GHG emissions and mitigation options. Through an online survey, we investigated stakeholders’ data needs for estimating forest area and change, forest biomass and emission factors, and AFOLU GHG emissions. The survey was completed by 359 respondents from governmental, intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations, research institutes and universities, and public and private companies. These can be grouped into data users and data providers. Our results show that current open and freely available datasets and portals are only able to fulfil stakeholder needs to a certain degree. Users require a) detailed documentation regarding the scope and usability of the data, b) comparability between alternative data sources, c) uncertainty estimates for evaluating mitigation options, d) more region-specific and detailed data with higher accuracy for sub-national application, e) regular updates and continuity for establishing consistent time series. These requirements are found to be key elements for increasing overall transparency of data sources, definitions, methodologies and assumptions, which is required under the Paris Agreement. Raising awareness and improving data availability through centralized platforms are important for increasing engagement of data users. In countries with low capacities, independent data can support countries’ mitigation planning and implementation, and related GHG reporting. However, there is a strong need for further guidance and capacity development (i.e. ‘readiness support’) on how to make proper use of independent datasets. Continued investments will be needed to sustain programmes and keep improving datasets to serve the objectives of the many stakeholders involved in climate change mitigation and should focus on increased accessibility and transparency of data to encourage stakeholder involvement