Direct and indirect transmission of four Salmonella enterica serotypes in pigs

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Feed-borne spread of <it>Salmonella </it>spp. to pigs has been documented several times in recent years in Sweden. Experiences from the field suggest that feed-associated serotypes might be less transmittable and subsequently easier to eradicate from pig herds than other serotypes more commonly associated to pigs. Four <it>Salmonella </it>serotypes were selected for experimental studies in pigs in order to study transmissibility and compare possible differences between feed-assoociated (<it>S </it>Cubana and <it>S </it>Yoruba) and pig-associated serotypes (<it>S </it>Derby and <it>S </it>Typhimurium).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Direct contact transmission was studied in four groups of pigs formed by six 10-week-old salmonella negative pigs commingled with two fatteners excreting one of the four salmonella serotypes. Indirect transmission was studied by putting six 10-week-old salmonella negative pigs in each of four salmonella contaminated rooms. Each room had previously housed a group of pigs, excreting one of the four selected serotypes.</p> <p>All pigs were monitored for two weeks with respect to the faecal excretion of salmonella and the presence of serum antibodies. At the end of the trial, eight samples from inner tissues and organs were collected from each pig at necropsy.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In the four direct transmission groups, one pig shed <it>Salmonella </it>(Cubana) at one occasion. At necropsy, <it>S </it>Typhimurium was isolated from one pig.</p> <p>In the indirect transmission groups, two pigs in the Yoruba room and one pig in each of the other rooms were excreting detectable levels of <it>Salmonella </it>once during the study period of two weeks. At necropsy, <it>S </it>Derby was isolated from one of six pigs in the Derby room and <it>S </it>Typhimurium was isolated from four of the six pigs in the Typhimurium room.</p> <p>No significant serological response could be detected in any of the 48 pigs.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>These results show that all four selected serotypes were able to be transmitted in at least one of these field-like trials, but the transmission rate was low in all groups and no obvious differences between feed-associated and pig-associated serotypes in the transmission to naïve pigs and their subsequent faecal shedding were revealed. However, the post mortem results indicated a higher detection of <it>S </it>Typhimurium in the ileocecal lymph nodes of pigs introduced into a contaminated environment in comparison with the other three serotypes.</p

Repeatability of lameness, fear and slipping scores to assess animal welfare upon arrival in pig slaughterhouses

The EU project Welfare Quality (R) proposes an overall assessment system for animal welfare based on animal outcomes. The objective of this study was to test inter-observer reliability (IOR) when assessing lameness, fear and slipping and falling scores as parameters for monitoring the welfare of killing pigs during arrival at the slaughterhouse. Two Belgian and two Spanish slaughterhouses were visited by six to seven observers. Lameness, slipping and falling were assessed twice; during unloading and in the passageway to the lairage zone (lairage). Fear, which was assessed in the unloading area, was based on four indicators: reluctance to move, retreat attempts, turning back and vocalisations. Lameness had low-to-moderate IOR when observed in the passageway to lairage (r = 0.46), but the IOR was low during unloading (r = 0.25). IOR for slipping and falling was moderate to high (r = 0.71 and r = 0.50, respectively), when assessed in the unloading area, but low for observations in the passageway (r = 0.13). Fear indicators had only moderate or low IOR. Turning back was the measure with the highest IOR (r = 0.43) and retreat attempts had the lowest IOR (r = 0.25). Based on these results, we concluded that scoring lameness could be reliable when assessed from the unloading bay to lairage, whereas slipping and falling should be scored in the unloading area of the slaughterhouse. We suggest scoring a maximum of two measures of fear on the same animals at the unloading area, with the most reliable parameters being turning back and reluctance to move. The three indicators of animal welfare (lameness, fear and slipping and falling) should be measured in a way to reduce overtax of the observers in order to achieve accurate results