Cyberbullying and traditional bullying in relation with adolescents’ perception of parenting

This study investigates the relation between parenting and involvement in cyberbullying. We predicted that cyberbullies and cyberbully-victims report less responsiveness and de manding reactions from their parents than victims and youthswho are not involved in cyberbullying. Furthermore, we predicted that youths with neglectful parents cyberbully the most often and youth with authoritative parents cyberbully the least. The same differences were predicted for traditional bullying. behavio and for youth involved in both forms of bullying behavior. Participants were made up to 1200 youths from 10-14 years old. They responded to a survey measuring cyberbullying and traditional bullying with questions based on the sub-scales from the Bully?Victim Questionnaire, and parenting with an adjusated version of the Parenting Style Questionnaire. Most results confirm out predictions. Results on authoritative, autoritarian, permissive and neglectful parenting styles suggest that for bullies, demanding actions are an important dimension of thier behavior and for victims, responsiveness is an important dimension of their behavior

Emotion-Focused Coping Worsens Depressive Feelings and Health Complaints in Cyberbullied Children

Coping may explain why being cyberbullied affects children’s well-being differently, though previous studies are inconclusive. This survey among 325 children focused on the role coping strategies may play in the relationship between cyberbullying and depressive feelings and health complaints. Being cyberbullied was measured with the Cyberbullying Questionnaire, general coping with the Utrecht Coping List, and cyberbullying-specific coping with a questionnaire developed for this study. Health complaints were measured with the Short Questionnaire for Experienced Health and depressive feelings with the shortened Children’s Depression Inventory. The results showed that 18.8% of the children were bullied by mobile phone and 24.1% through the internet. Correlation analyses showed strong relationships between victimization, coping, depressive feelings, and health complaints. In the regression analyses conducted in all children, victimization, general emotion-focused, and problem-focused copings had main effects on depressive feelings and health complaints; emotion-focused coping interacted with victimization in health complaints. Simple slope analyses of children with high scores on emotion-focused general coping showed a stronger positive relationship between victimization and health complaints. Regression analyses of only cyberbullied children showed that only emotion-focused cyber-specific coping was associated with more health complaints and depressive feelings

The Influence of Personality Traits on the Relationship between Bullying at Work, Health Complaints and Absenteeism

Aim: Bullying and harassment at work is widespread and could have negative effects on both the victims and the organizations in which it occurs. Literature about the influence of the personality of the victims on health outcomes is scarce. Starting from the Michigan Stress Model (Caplan, Cobb, French, Pinneau, & Van Harison, 1975), we investigated the relationships between the Big Five personality traits, being bullied at work, physical health complaints and absenteeism. Bullying is defined in this paper as the repeated, systematic, intentional negative behavior of one or more individuals directed at another individual (Olweus,1993). A distinction was made between person-related bullying, e.g. giving names, insulting and gossiping, and work-related bullying, e.g. giving unreasonable deadlines or too much or too few work. We expected victimization to have a significant positive relationship with health complaints and absenteeism. Personal traits were assumed to moderate both relationships. Method: An online survey with validated self-report questionnaires among 2650 Belgian government employees (age range 18-65, response rate = 41%, 36 % male, 64 % female) was conducted. Bullying was measured with the Negative Acts Questionnaire (NAQ, α= .92), the personality traits with the NEO-Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI, α= .88 - .94 ), physical health complaints with the Dutch version (VOEG) of the Questionnaire Research Experienced Health (α= .88) and absenteeism with one item of Questionnaire Organizational Stress-D (VOS-D). Results and conclusions: Hierarchical regression analysis showed that both work-related bullying and person-related bullying influenced reported physical health negatively. Contrary to our hypothesis the personality traits did not moderate this relationships. A correlation was found between person-related (but not work-related) bullying and absenteeism: victimized employees were more absent compared to non-victimized colleagues. The personality trait openness moderated this relationship. Opposite to our expectations the relation between being bullied and absenteeism was stronger for employees who score high on openness. In addition it was found that the personality traits neuroticism and conscientiousness partly mediated the relationship between being bullied (total bullying) and health complaints, but not that between being bullied and absenteeism. Those correlations are positive: being bullied is related with higher scores on neuroticism and conscientiousness and with more health complaints. These results illustrate the need for future studies into the influence of personality traits on the effects of bullying on victims and show the relevance of the difference between person-related and work-related bullying. Caplan, R.D., Cobb, S., French, J.R.D., Pinneau, Jr, S.R. & Van Harison, R. (1975) Job demands and worker health; main effects and occupational differences. Cincinnati, OH. National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (publication 75-168). Olweus, D. (1993) Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Malden: Blackwell

Diffusion of technological innovations : promoting the large-scale use of technology

Without Abstract