7 research outputs found
Discriminant analysis under the common principal components model
For two or more populations of which the covariance matrices have a common set of eigenvectors, but different sets of eigenvalues, the common principal components (CPC) model is appropriate. Pepler et al. (2015) proposed a regularised CPC covariance matrix estimator and showed that this estimator outperforms the unbiased and pooled estimators in situations where the CPC model is applicable. This paper extends their work to the context of discriminant analysis for two groups, by plugging the regularised CPC estimator into the ordinary quadratic discriminant function. Monte Carlo simulation results show that CPC discriminant analysis offers significant improvements in misclassification error rates in certain situations, and at worst performs similar to ordinary quadratic and linear discriminant analysis. Based on these results, CPC discriminant analysis is recommended for situations where the sample size is small compared to the number of variables, in particular for cases where there is uncertainty about the population covariance matrix structures
A variable selection proposal for multiple linear regression analysis
Variable selection in multiple linear regression models is considered. It is shown that for the special case of orthogonal predictor variables, an adaptive pre-test-type procedure proposed by Venter and Steel [Simultaneous selection and estimation for the some zeros family of normal models, J. Statist. Comput. Simul. 45 (1993), pp. 129-146] is almost equivalent to least angle regression, proposed by Efron et al. [Least angle regression, Ann. Stat. 32 (2004), pp. 407-499]. A new adaptive pre-test-type procedure is proposed, which extends the procedure of Venter and Steel to the general non-orthogonal case in a multiple linear regression analysis. This new procedure is based on a likelihood ratio test where the critical value is determined data-dependently. A practical illustration and results from a simulation study are presented. © 2011 Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Influential data cases when the Cp criterion is used for variable selection in multiple linear regression
Regularised covariance matrix estimation under the common principal components model
The common principal components (CPC) model provides a way to model the population covariance matrices of several groups by assuming a common eigenvector structure. When appropriate, this model can provide covariance matrix estimators of which the elements have smaller standard errors than when using either the pooled covariance matrix or the per group unbiased sample covariance matrix estimators. In this paper, a regularised CPC estimator under the assumption of a common (or partially common) eigenvector structure in the populations is proposed. After estimation of the common eigenvectors using the Flury-Gautschi (or other) algorithm, the off-diagonal elements of the nearly diagonalised covariance matrices are shrunk towards zero and multiplied with the orthogonal common eigenvector matrix to obtain the regularised CPC covariance matrix estimates. The optimal shrinkage intensity per group can be estimated using cross-validation. The efficiency of these estimators compared to the pooled and unbiased estimators is investigated in a Monte Carlo simulation study, and the regularised CPC estimator is applied to a real data set to demonstrate the utility of the method
A comparison of some methods for the selection of a common eigenvector model for the covariance matrices of two groups
Two new non-parametric common principal component model selection procedures based on bootstrap distributions of the vector correlations of all combinations of the eigenvectors from two groups are proposed. The performance of these methods is compared in a simulation study to the two parametric methods previously suggested by Flury (1988), as well as modified versions of two non-parametric methods proposed by Klingenberg (1996) and Klingenberg and McIntyre (1998). The proposed bootstrap vector correlation distribution (BVD) method is shown to outperform all of the existing methods in most of the simulated situations considered