Precision of Bone Mineral Density Measurements Around Total Ankle Replacement Using Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry

Introduction: Joint prosthesis survival is associated with the quality of surrounding bone. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is capable to evaluate areal bone mineral density (BMD) around different prosthetic implants, but no studies evaluated periprosthetic bone around total ankle replacement (TAR). Our aim is to determine the precision of the DXA periprosthetic BMD around TAR. Methodology: Short-term precision was evaluated on 15 consecutive patients. Each ankle was scanned 3 times both in the posteroanterior (PA) and lateral views with a dedicated patient positioning protocol. Up to four squared regions of interest (ROIs) were placed in the periprosthetic bone around tibial and talar implants, with an additional ROI to include the calcaneal body in the lateral scan. Coefficient of variation (CV%) and least significant change were calculated according to the International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Results: The lateral projection showed lower mean CV values compared to the PA projection, with an average precision error of 2.21% (lateral scan) compared to 3.34% (PA scans). Overall, the lowest precision error was found at both \u201cglobal\u201d ROIs (CV = 1.25% on PA and CV = 1.3% on lateral). The highest CV value on PA was found at the medial aspect of talar side (ROI 3; CV = 4.89%), while on the lateral scan the highest CV value was found on the posterior aspect of talar side (ROI 2; CV = 2.99%). Conclusions: We found very good reproducibility BMD values of periprosthetic bone around TAR, that were comparable or even better compared to other studies that evaluated periprosthetic BMD around different prosthetic implants. DXA can be used to precisely monitor bone density around ankle prostheses, despite further long-term longitudinal studies are required to assess the clinical utility of such measurements

Total ankle replacement: is pre-operative varus deformity a predictor of poor survival rate and clinical and radiological outcomes?

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare survival rate and clinical and radiological outcomes of a cementless mobile-bearing total ankle replacement (TAR) between two groups of patients, affected by end-stage ankle arthritis, with or without a pre-operative varus deformity. METHODS: A total of 81 patients (81 ankles) were included in the study and divided in two groups. Group A, "varus" group, includes 11 patients with pre-operative varus deformity of more than 10\ua0\ub0 and group B, "neutral" group, includes 70 patients, with a varus/valgus deformity of less than 10\ua0\ub0. American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, visual analogue scale (VAS), and Short Form (SF)-12 score were used to compare clinical outcomes. Radiological parameters, complications, and survival rate at last follow-up were also recorded. RESULTS: In both groups, all clinical and radiological parameters improved after surgery (p\ua0\u20090.001). CONCLUSIONS: Severe varus malalignment should not be considered a contraindication for a mobile-bearing TAR. Nevertheless, TAR in severe deformity should be performed only by experienced surgeons