Differentiation of carcinosarcoma from endometrial carcinoma on magnetic resonance imaging using deep learning

Purpose: To verify whether deep learning can be used to differentiate between carcinosarcomas (CSs) and endometrial carcinomas (ECs) using several magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences. Material and methods: This retrospective study included 52 patients with CS and 279 patients with EC. A deep-learning model that uses convolutional neural networks (CNN) was trained with 572 T2-weighted images (T2WI) from 42 patients, 488 apparent diffusion coefficient of water maps from 33 patients, and 539 fat-saturated contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images from 40 patients with CS, as well as 1612 images from 223 patients with EC for each sequence. These were tested with 9-10 images of 9-10 patients with CS and 56 images of 56 patients with EC for each sequence, respectively. Three experienced radiologists independently interpreted these test images. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for each sequence were compared between the CNN models and the radiologists. Results: The CNN model of each sequence had sensitivity 0.89-0.93, specificity 0.44-0.70, accuracy 0.83-0.89, and AUC 0.80-0.94. It also showed an equivalent or better diagnostic performance than the 3 readers (sensitivity 0.43-0.91, specificity 0.30-0.78, accuracy 0.45-0.88, and AUC 0.49-0.92). The CNN model displayed the highest diagnostic performance on T2WI (sensitivity 0.93, specificity 0.70, accuracy 0.89, and AUC 0.94). Conclusions: Deep learning provided diagnostic performance comparable to or better than experienced radiologists when distinguishing between CS and EC on MRI

Diagnosing Ovarian Cancer on MRI: A Preliminary Study Comparing Deep Learning and Radiologist Assessments

Background: This study aimed to compare deep learning with radiologists’ assessments for diagnosing ovarian carcinoma using MRI. Methods: This retrospective study included 194 patients with pathologically confirmed ovarian carcinomas or borderline tumors and 271 patients with non-malignant lesions who underwent MRI between January 2015 and December 2020. T2WI, DWI, ADC map, and fat-saturated contrast-enhanced T1WI were used for the analysis. A deep learning model based on a convolutional neural network (CNN) was trained using 1798 images from 146 patients with malignant tumors and 1865 images from 219 patients with non-malignant lesions for each sequence, and we tested with 48 and 52 images of patients with malignant and non-malignant lesions, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC were compared between the CNN and interpretations of three experienced radiologists. Results: The CNN of each sequence had a sensitivity of 0.77–0.85, specificity of 0.77–0.92, accuracy of 0.81–0.87, and an AUC of 0.83–0.89, and it achieved a diagnostic performance equivalent to the radiologists. The CNN showed the highest diagnostic performance on the ADC map among all sequences (specificity = 0.85; sensitivity = 0.77; accuracy = 0.81; AUC = 0.89). Conclusion: The CNNs provided a diagnostic performance that was non-inferior to the radiologists for diagnosing ovarian carcinomas on MRI