Organ donation after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a population-based study of data from the Paris Sudden Death Expertise Center

International audienceAbstract Background Organ shortage is a major public health issue, and patients who die after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) could be a valuable source of organs. Here, our objective was to identify factors associated with organ donation after brain death complicating OHCA, in unselected patients entered into a comprehensive real-life registry covering a well-defined geographic area. Methods We prospectively analyzed consecutive adults with OHCA who were successfully resuscitated, but died in intensive care units in the Paris region in 2011–2018. The primary outcome was organ donation after brain death. Independent risk factors were identified using logistic regression analysis. One-year graft survival was assessed using Cox and log-rank tests. Results Of the 3061 included patients, 136 (4.4%) became organ donors after brain death, i.e., 28% of the patients with brain death. An interaction between admission pH and post-resuscitation shock was identified. By multivariate analysis, in patients with post-resuscitation shock, factors associated with organ donation were neurological cause of OHCA (odds ratio [OR], 14.5 [7.6–27.4], P < 0.001), higher pH (OR/0.1 increase, 1.3 [1.1–1.6], P < 0.001); older age was negatively associated with donation (OR/10-year increase, 0.7 [0.6–0.8], P < 0.001). In patients without post-resuscitation shock, the factor associated with donation was neurological cause of OHCA (OR, 6.9 [3.0–15.9], P < 0.001); higher pH (OR/0.1 increase, 0.8 [0.7–1.0], P = 0.04) and OHCA at home (OR, 0.4 [0.2–0.7], P = 0.006) were negatively associated with organ donation. One-year graft survival did not differ according to Utstein characteristics of the donor. Conclusions 4% of patients who died in ICU after OHCA led to organ donation. Patients with OHCA constitute a valuable source of donated organs, and special attention should be paid to young patients with OHCA of neurological cause

Sudden Cardiac Arrest in Young Women

International audienc

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a registry study

International audienceAbstract Aims Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) without return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) despite conventional resuscitation is common and has poor outcomes. Adding extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (extracorporeal-CPR) is increasingly used in an attempt to improve outcomes. Methods and results We analysed a prospective registry of 13 191 OHCAs in the Paris region from May 2011 to January 2018. We compared survival at hospital discharge with and without extracorporeal-CPR and identified factors associated with survival in patients given extracorporeal-CPR. Survival was 8% in 525 patients given extracorporeal-CPR and 9% in 12 666 patients given conventional-CPR (P = 0.91). By adjusted multivariate analysis, extracorporeal-CPR was not associated with hospital survival [odds ratio (OR), 1.3; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.8–2.1; P = 0.24]. By conditional logistic regression with matching on a propensity score (including age, sex, occurrence at home, bystander CPR, initial rhythm, collapse-to-CPR time, duration of resuscitation, and ROSC), similar results were found (OR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.5–1.3; P = 0.41). In the extracorporeal-CPR group, factors associated with hospital survival were initial shockable rhythm (OR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.5–10.3; P = 0.005), transient ROSC before ECMO (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.1–4.7; P = 0.03), and prehospital ECMO implantation (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.5–5.9; P = 0.002). Conclusions In a population-based registry, 4% of OHCAs were treated with extracorporeal-CPR, which was not associated with increased hospital survival. Early ECMO implantation may improve outcomes. The initial rhythm and ROSC may help select patients for extracorporeal-CPR

Impact of Coronary Lesion Stability on the Benefit of Emergent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Sudden Cardiac Arrest

International audienceBackground: Conflicting data exist regarding the benefit of urgent coronary angiogram and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after sudden cardiac arrest, particularly in the absence of ST-segment elevation. We hypothesized that the type of lesions treated (stable versus unstable) influences the benefit derived from PCI. Methods: Data were taken between May 2011 and 2014 from a prospective registry enrolling all sudden cardiac arrest in Paris and suburbs (6.7 million inhabitants). Patients undergoing emergent coronary angiogram were included. Decision to perform PCI was left to the discretion of local teams. We assessed the impact of emergent PCI on survival at discharge according to whether the treated lesion was angiographically unstable or stable, and we investigated the predictive factors for unstable coronary lesions. Results: Among 9265 sudden cardiac arrests occurring during the study period, 1078 underwent emergent coronary angiogram (median age: 59.6 years, 78.3% males): 463 (42.9%) had an unstable lesion, 253 (23.5%) only stable lesions, and 362 (33.6%) no significant lesions. Emergent PCI was performed in 478 patients (91.4% of unstable and 21.7% of stable lesions). At discharge, PCI of unstable lesions was associated with twice-higher survival rate compared with untreated unstable lesions (47.9% versus 25.6%, P =0.013), while stable lesions PCI did not improve survival (25.5% versus 26.3%, P =1.00). After adjustment, PCI of unstable coronary lesions was independently associated with improved survival (odds ratio, 2.09 [95% CI, 1.42–3.09], P <0.001), contrary to PCI of stable lesions (odds ratio, 0.92 [95% CI. 0.44–1.87], P =0.824). Angina, initial shockable rhythm, ST-segment elevation, and absence of known coronary artery disease were independent predictors of unstable lesions. Conclusions: Emergent PCI of unstable lesions is associated with improved survival after sudden cardiac arrest, contrary to PCI of stable lesions. Accordingly, early PCI should only be performed in patients with unstable lesions. Four factors (chest pain, ST-elevation, absence of coronary artery disease history, and shockable initial rhythm) could help identify patients with unstable lesions who would, therefore, benefit from emergent coronary angiogram