Propuesta de mejora al proceso de evaluación de desempeño de la empresa ILP Ingeniería S.A.S.

Apéndice A Registro de evaluación de desempeñoEl mundo cambiante ha obligado a las organizaciones a reevaluar los diferentes procedimientos realizados por el departamento de gestión de recursos humanos; desde el momento que se detecta la necesidad de cubrir una vacante en la organización, pasando por la descripción del perfil, las competencias, habilidades y nivel educativo necesarios de los candidatos; posterior a esto el proceso de selección del personal más idóneo y competente para desempeñar las funciones descritas y cubrir la vacante solicitada; el cual continua con el proceso de contratación, inducción, entrenamiento y capacitación de los trabajadores de tal forma que les permita desarrollar su rol y sus funciones de una manera eficiente y satisfactoria en el cumplimiento de los objetivos organizacionales; de allí se despliega la importancia del proceso de evaluación de desempeño, ya que es una herramienta utilizada dentro de las empresas para medir el logro y objetivos tanto de la compañía como de sus trabajadores, además esta se convirtió en un insumo para la toma de decisiones a nivel gerencial referente a promociones, ascensos y compensación ya sean salariales o de reconocimiento profesional y emocional; con igual importancia y relevancia la evaluación de desempeño le permite a los trabajadores mejorar su comportamiento, actitud, compromiso y lealtad con las organizaciones y de paso su calidad de vida, convirtiéndose estos en clientes internos satisfechos y orgullosos de pertenecer a la misma, permitiendo de esta manera mantener un clima laboral satisfactorio y agradable, con condiciones dignas, justas, equitativas y que promuevan el cuidado y protección de su recurso más valioso, sus trabajadores, sin importar los resultados, estos siempre deberán ser retroalimentados y los hallazgos de las mismas expuestos.The changing world has forced organizations to reevaluate the different procedures carried out by the human resources management department; from the moment the need to fill a vacancy in the organization is detected, going through the description of the profile, the necessary skills, abilities and educational level of the candidates; After this, the selection process of the most suitable and competent personnel to perform the functions described and fill the requested vacancy; which continues with the process of hiring, induction, training and qualification of the workers in such a way that it allows them to develop their role and their functions in an efficient and satisfactory way in the fulfillment of the organizational objectives; From there the importance of the performance evaluation process unfolds, since it is a tool used within companies to measure the achievement and objectives of both the company and its workers, in addition it became an input for decision making at the managerial level referring to promotions, promotions and compensation, whether salary or professional and emotional recognition; With equal importance and relevance, performance evaluation allows workers to improve their behavior, attitude, commitment and loyalty to organizations and, incidentally, their quality of life, turning them into internal clients who are satisfied and proud to belong to it, allowing In this way, maintain a satisfactory and pleasant work environment, with dignified, fair, equitable conditions that promote the care and protection of its most valuable resource, its workers, regardless of the results, these should always be fed back and their findings exposed

Measurements of the Total and Differential Higgs Boson Production Cross Sections Combining the H??????? and H???ZZ*???4??? Decay Channels at s\sqrt{s}=8??????TeV with the ATLAS Detector

Measurements of the total and differential cross sections of Higgs boson production are performed using 20.3~fb$^{-1}$ of $pp$ collisions produced by the Large Hadron Collider at a center-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s} = 8$ TeV and recorded by the ATLAS detector. Cross sections are obtained from measured $H \rightarrow \gamma \gamma$ and $H \rightarrow ZZ ^{*}\rightarrow 4\ell$ event yields, which are combined accounting for detector efficiencies, fiducial acceptances and branching fractions. Differential cross sections are reported as a function of Higgs boson transverse momentum, Higgs boson rapidity, number of jets in the event, and transverse momentum of the leading jet. The total production cross section is determined to be $\sigma_{pp \to H} = 33.0 \pm 5.3 \, ({\rm stat}) \pm 1.6 \, ({\rm sys}) \mathrm{pb}$. The measurements are compared to state-of-the-art predictions.Measurements of the total and differential cross sections of Higgs boson production are performed using 20.3  fb-1 of pp collisions produced by the Large Hadron Collider at a center-of-mass energy of s=8  TeV and recorded by the ATLAS detector. Cross sections are obtained from measured H→γγ and H→ZZ*→4ℓ event yields, which are combined accounting for detector efficiencies, fiducial acceptances, and branching fractions. Differential cross sections are reported as a function of Higgs boson transverse momentum, Higgs boson rapidity, number of jets in the event, and transverse momentum of the leading jet. The total production cross section is determined to be σpp→H=33.0±5.3 (stat)±1.6 (syst)  pb. The measurements are compared to state-of-the-art predictions.Measurements of the total and differential cross sections of Higgs boson production are performed using 20.3 fb$^{-1}$ of $pp$ collisions produced by the Large Hadron Collider at a center-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s} = 8$ TeV and recorded by the ATLAS detector. Cross sections are obtained from measured $H \rightarrow \gamma \gamma$ and $H \rightarrow ZZ ^{*}\rightarrow 4\ell$ event yields, which are combined accounting for detector efficiencies, fiducial acceptances and branching fractions. Differential cross sections are reported as a function of Higgs boson transverse momentum, Higgs boson rapidity, number of jets in the event, and transverse momentum of the leading jet. The total production cross section is determined to be $\sigma_{pp \to H} = 33.0 \pm 5.3 \, ({\rm stat}) \pm 1.6 \, ({\rm sys}) \mathrm{pb}$. The measurements are compared to state-of-the-art predictions