Psychiatric Correlates of Internet Gaming Disorder in Children

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) criteria has included internet gaming disorder (IGD) as a condition, but it needs further research. Little is known about who is at risk of developing IGD. Efforts at prevention and early intervention are very important in childhood and adolescence when the first signs of IGD appear, especially in susceptible groups. However, in the results of studies investigating the relationship between psychopathologies and IGD, there are contradictions that may be the result of heterogeneity in the evaluation processes. Therefore, it is critical to use DSM-5 criteria or questionnaires regarding IGD. Ninety-two children were included in this study, which is a cross-sectional study evaluating the correlation between IGD and other possible comorbid conditions (inattention, hyperactivity/impulsivity, oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder, anxiety, depression, suicidality, and family dysfunction). IGD scores were significantly correlated with the scores of anxiety, hyperactivity/impulsivity, and suicidal ideation. However, we did not find a significant correlation between IGD and depression or family dysfunction. The mean time between the first internet gaming experience and the parents' recognition of the disorder was about 2 years. Children suffering from anxiety or hyperactivity/impulsivity should be evaluated for their screen time. Children with problematic gaming behavior are at risk for developing suicidal tendencies

DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING FINDINGS IN CHILDREN WITH SLUGGISH COGNITIVE TEMPO COMORBID ADHD

WOS:000544087501097[No Abstract Available]Ege University Scientific Research Projects Coordination UnitEge University [16-TIP-047]Supported by the Ege University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit-Project 16-TIP-04

Barkley Child Attention Scale Validity and Reliability Study

WOS: 000445818900007Objective: The purpose of this study is to examine the psychometric properties of the Barkley Child Attention Scale (BCAS) for 6-to 12-year-old children. Method: This study was conducted with 291 children (of an age of 6-12 years) with a clinically normal level of intelligence and a diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The structure validity of the scale was studied by exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. In order to evaluate the measure-dependent validity of the scale, Child Behavior Checklist for ages 6-18 and Swanson, Nolan and Pelham Questionnaire (SNAP-IV) parental form were used. Reliability of the scale was measured by Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Results: As a result of the exploratory factor analysis, the scale consists of two factors called "daydreaming" and "sluggish," as is the case in its original form. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the fit indices of the scale were at an acceptable level. The correlation analysis study for the criterion-related validity study of the scale revealed that Sluggish Cognitive Tempo (SCT) had a positive correlation with ADHD-IN and internalization problems, a negative correlation with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder/hyperactivity-impulsivity (ADHD-HI), and no correlation with externalization problems. Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the BCAS is 0.86 and the scale is seen to be reliable. Conclusion: It can be said that the BCAS is a valid and reliable scale that can measure sluggish cognitive tempo symptoms of 6- to 12-year-old children

DRD4 genotyping may differentiate symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and sluggish cognitive tempo

Rohde, Luis Augusto P/0000-0002-4552-4188; Ercan, Ertugrul/0000-0003-0480-4738WOS:000592833700010PubMed: 32491038Objective: Studies to reduce the heterogeneity of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have increased interest in the concept of sluggish cognitive tempo (SCT). The aim of this study was to investigate if the prevalence of two variable-number tandem repeats (VNTRs) located within the 3'-untranslated region of the DAT1 gene and in exon 3 of the dopamine D4 receptor (DRD4) gene differ among four groups (31 subjects with SCT but no ADHD, 146 individuals with ADHD but no SCT, 67 subjects with SCT + ADHD, and 92 healthy controls). Methods: We compared the sociodemographic profiles, neurocognitive domains, and prevalence of two VNTRs in SCT and ADHD subjects versus typically developing (TD) controls. Results: The SCT without ADHD group had a higher proportion of females and lower parental educational attainment. Subjects in this group performed worse on neuropsychological tests, except for psychomotor speed and commission errors, compared to controls. However, the ADHD without SCT group performed significantly worse on all neuropsychological domains than controls. We found that 4R homozygosity for the DRD4 gene was most prevalent in the ADHD without SCT group. The SCT without ADHD group had the highest 7R allele frequency, differing significantly from the ADHD without SCT group. Conclusion: The 7R allele of DRD4 gene was found to be significantly more prevalent in SCT cases than in ADHD cases. No substantial neuropsychological differences were found between SCT and ADHD subjects.Ege UniversityEge University [TTU-2018-20009]This study was supported by the Ege University Scientific Research Projects Coordinator (TTU-2018-20009)

Validity of proposed DSM-5 ADHD impulsivity symptoms in children

WOS: 000385059900009PubMed ID: 26979524The American Psychiatric Association (APA) working group on Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) proposed the inclusion of four new impulsivity symptoms. However, they were not included in DSM-5 due to the lack of sufficient evidence. The aim of this study is to investigate the performance of the proposed four ADHD impulsivity symptoms with respect to: (a) ADHD factor structure; (b) performance in predicting clinical impairment; (c) specificity for ADHD diagnosis and (d) best symptomatic threshold to predict clinical impairment. The sample comprised 416 children (31 ADHD subjects according to both DSM-IV and proposed DSM-5, 20 ADHD subjects according to just one diagnostic system and 365 controls) from 12 schools. Diagnoses were derived using semi-structured interviews and ADHD rating scales. Results from confirmatory factor analysis indicate that addition of the four new impulsivity items provided a slightly better factor structure if compared to models including only 18 items. Regression analyses showed that only one of the new impulsivity symptoms (impatient) was part of the list of best predictors of impairment. None of the four new impulsivity items was specifically associated with ADHD diagnosis. The best cutoff point in the hyperactivity/impulsivity dimension for predicting impairment did not change significantly. Overall, our findings suggest that the determination on how to best capture impulsivity dimension as part of the ADHD construct needs more investigation and that there is not enough evidence to include these four assessed impulsivity symptoms as part of the ADHD criteria.Shire; Eli-LillyEli Lilly; Janssen-CilagJohnson & Johnson USAJanssen Biotech Inc; NovartisNovartisLuis A. Rohde has received honoraria, has been on the speakers' bureau/advisory board and/or has acted as a consultant for Eli-Lilly, Janssen-Cilag, Novartis and Shire in the last 3 years. He receives authorship royalties from Oxford Press and ArtMed. He also received travel awards for taking part of 2014 APA and 2015 WFADHD meetings from Shire. The ADHD and Juvenile Bipolar Disorder Outpatient Programs chaired by him received unrestricted educational and research support from the following pharmaceutical companies in the last 3 years: Eli-Lilly, Janssen-Cilag, Novartis, and Shire. Eyup Sabri Ercan is in charge of the advisory board of Lilly and Janssen-Cilag. The other authors have no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest to report