Qualitative evaluation of mental health services for clients with limited English proficiency

BACKGROUND: To meet federal requirements under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, the state of California instituted policies requiring that comprehensive mental health services in native languages be made available to limited English proficiency (LEP) populations when concentrations exceed “threshold” levels. METHODS: This paper builds on promising results from quantitative evaluations by reporting on qualitative interviews with Latino and Vietnamese LEP clients in mental health services (N = 20) to examine the awareness, impact, and implications of these threshold language policies. RESULTS: Results suggest that, while individuals are often not aware of the policies themselves, the language-related services they receive that are prompted by the policies are critical to treatment initiation and retention. Results also convey the complexities of using interpreters for sensitive psychological topics, and suggest that, for LEP individuals seeking mental health treatment, providers who speak their native languages are generally preferred. CONCLUSIONS: Access to language-appropriate services seems to be an important part of why LEP populations seek mental health treatment. However, there are multiple variables that factor into the usage and usefulness of such services

Medicare and social security law: the full texts of the provisions of the Social security act relating to old-age, survivors, and disability insurance benefits; medicare and public welfare; the Federal insurance contributions act and Self-employment contributions act; and other pertinent provisions of the Internal revenue code, as amended, with 1965 changes in place.

Mode of access: Internet

Board of Contract Appeals decisions.

Vol. number designates the year and period covered; i.e., v. 56-2 indicates 1956, July-Dec.Mode of access: Internet.Kept up-to-date by: Contract appeals decision reports, which has an extra edition with title, Main citator table, Contract Appeals decisions