71 research outputs found

    Superconductivity in the two dimensional Hubbard Model.

    Full text link
    Quasiparticle bands of the two-dimensional Hubbard model are calculated using the Roth two-pole approximation to the one particle Green's function. Excellent agreement is obtained with recent Monte Carlo calculations, including an anomalous volume of the Fermi surface near half-filling, which can possibly be explained in terms of a breakdown of Fermi liquid theory. The calculated bands are very flat around the (pi,0) points of the Brillouin zone in agreement with photoemission measurements of cuprate superconductors. With doping there is a shift in spectral weight from the upper band to the lower band. The Roth method is extended to deal with superconductivity within a four-pole approximation allowing electron-hole mixing. It is shown that triplet p-wave pairing never occurs. Singlet d_{x^2-y^2}-wave pairing is strongly favoured and optimal doping occurs when the van Hove singularity, corresponding to the flat band part, lies at the Fermi level. Nearest neighbour antiferromagnetic correlations play an important role in flattening the bands near the Fermi level and in favouring superconductivity. However the mechanism for superconductivity is a local one, in contrast to spin fluctuation exchange models. For reasonable values of the hopping parameter the transition temperature T_c is in the range 10-100K. The optimum doping delta_c lies between 0.14 and 0.25, depending on the ratio U/t. The gap equation has a BCS-like form and (2*Delta_{max})/(kT_c) ~ 4.Comment: REVTeX, 35 pages, including 19 PostScript figures numbered 1a to 11. Uses epsf.sty (included). Everything in uuencoded gz-compressed .tar file, (self-unpacking, see header). Submitted to Phys. Rev. B (24-2-95

    The 3-Band Hubbard-Model versus the 1-Band Model for the high-Tc Cuprates: Pairing Dynamics, Superconductivity and the Ground-State Phase Diagram

    Full text link
    One central challenge in high-TcT_c superconductivity (SC) is to derive a detailed understanding for the specific role of the CuCu-dx2y2d_{x^2-y^2} and OO-px,yp_{x,y} orbital degrees of freedom. In most theoretical studies an effective one-band Hubbard (1BH) or t-J model has been used. Here, the physics is that of doping into a Mott-insulator, whereas the actual high-TcT_c cuprates are doped charge-transfer insulators. To shed light on the related question, where the material-dependent physics enters, we compare the competing magnetic and superconducting phases in the ground state, the single- and two-particle excitations and, in particular, the pairing interaction and its dynamics in the three-band Hubbard (3BH) and 1BH-models. Using a cluster embedding scheme, i.e. the variational cluster approach (VCA), we find which frequencies are relevant for pairing in the two models as a function of interaction strength and doping: in the 3BH-models the interaction in the low- to optimal-doping regime is dominated by retarded pairing due to low-energy spin fluctuations with surprisingly little influence of inter-band (p-d charge) fluctuations. On the other hand, in the 1BH-model, in addition a part comes from "high-energy" excited states (Hubbard band), which may be identified with a non-retarded contribution. We find these differences between a charge-transfer and a Mott insulator to be renormalized away for the ground-state phase diagram of the 3BH- and 1BH-models, which are in close overall agreement, i.e. are "universal". On the other hand, we expect the differences - and thus, the material dependence to show up in the "non-universal" finite-T phase diagram (TcT_c-values).Comment: 17 pages, 9 figure
    corecore