39 research outputs found

    Light Scattering in the Clouds on Jupiter

    Get PDF
    We construct maps of jovian cloud properties from images taken simultaneously by the Galileo solid state imaging system (SSI) and the near-infrared mapping spectrometer (NIMS) at 26 visible and near infrared wavelengths, ranging from 0.41 to 5.2 ”m. Three regions - the Great Red Spot (GRS), a 5-micron Hot Spot, and one of the White Ovals - are studied. We perform a principal component analysis (PCA) on the multispectral images. PCA shows that the pixel-to-pixel variations at the different wavelengths are highly correlated, and that 91% of the variance in the data can be summarized using only three maps. The three maps are combined into one color map, which indicates different 26-wavelength spectra as different colors. Using the representative spectra for each color we compare different areas on the map qualitatively. We find that in the GRS there is a red chromophore which is associated with clouds that block 5-”m emission. At the hot spot and white oval regions there is no chromophore associated with clouds. Most of the bright, optically thick clouds blocking thermal emission are also extended vertically to the upper troposphere. Some of the bright, optically thick clouds blocking thermal emission are deep and do not extend vertically to the upper troposphere. A small convective stormlike cloud to the northwest of the GRS is unusually reflective at long wavelengths (4”m) and might indicate large particles. We study lightning on Jupiter and the clouds illuminated by the lightning. The Galileo SSI lightning images have a resolution of 25 km/pixel and are able to resolve the diffuse spots of light scattered in the clouds, which have full widths at half maximum in the range 90-160 km. We compare the lightning images with the images produced by our 3D Monte Carlo light scattering model. The model reproduces non isotropic non-conservative scattering of the photons in the non-homogeneous opacity distribution. We derive that some of the observed scattering patterns are produced in a 3D cloud rather than in a plane-parallel cloud layer, suggesting deep convection. For the six flashes studied, the clouds above the lightning are optically thick (Γ > 5). Lightning is as deep as the bottom of the water cloud. Jovian flashes are more regular and circular than the largest terrestrial flashes observed from space.</p

    Saturn's aurora observed by the Cassini camera at visible wavelengths

    Get PDF
    The first observations of Saturn's visible-wavelength aurora were made by the Cassini camera. The aurora was observed between 2006 and 2013 in the northern and southern hemispheres. The color of the aurora changes from pink at a few hundred km above the horizon to purple at 1000-1500 km above the horizon. The spectrum observed in 9 filters spanning wavelengths from 250 nm to 1000 nm has a prominent H-alpha line and roughly agrees with laboratory simulated auroras. Auroras in both hemispheres vary dramatically with longitude. Auroras form bright arcs between 70 and 80 degree latitude north and between 65 and 80 degree latitude south, which sometimes spiral around the pole, and sometimes form double arcs. A large 10,000-km-scale longitudinal brightness structure persists for more than 100 hours. This structure rotates approximately together with Saturn. On top of the large steady structure, the auroras brighten suddenly on the timescales of a few minutes. These brightenings repeat with a period of about 1 hour. Smaller, 1000-km-scale structures may move faster or lag behind Saturn's rotation on timescales of tens of minutes. The persistence of nearly-corotating large bright longitudinal structure in the auroral oval seen in two movies spanning 8 and 11 rotations gives an estimate on the period of 10.65 ±\pm0.15 h for 2009 in the northern oval and 10.8±\pm 0.1 h for 2012 in the southern oval. The 2009 north aurora period is close to the north branch of Saturn Kilometric Radiation (SKR) detected at that time.Comment: 39 pages, 8 figures, 1 table, 6 supplementary movies, accepted to Icaru

    Cassini ISS Observation of Saturn’s North Polar Vortex and Comparison to the South Polar Vortex

    Get PDF
    We present analyses of Saturn’s north pole using high-resolution images captured in late 2012 by the Cassini spacecraft’s Imaging Science Subsystem (ISS) camera. The images reveal the presence of an intense cyclonic vortex centered at the north pole. In the red and green visible continuum wavelengths, the north polar region exhibits a cyclonically spiraling cloud morphology extending from the pole to 85°N planetocentric latitude, with a 4700 km radius. Images captured in the methane bands, which sense upper tropospheric haze, show an approximately circular hole in the haze extending up to 1.5° latitude away from the pole. The spiraling morphology and the “eye”-like hole at the center are reminiscent of a terrestrial tropical cyclone. In the System III reference frame (rotation period of 10h39m22.4s, Seidelmann et al. 2007; Archinal et al. 2011), the eastward wind speed increases to about 140 m s^(−1) at 89°N planetocentric latitude. The vorticity is (6.5± 1.5)×10^(−4)s^(−1) at the pole, and decreases to (1.3± 1.2)×10^(−4)s^(−1) at 89°N. In addition, we present an analysis of Saturn’s south polar vortex using images captured in January 2007 to compare its cloud morphology to the north pole. The set of images captured in 2007 includes filters that have not been analyzed before. Images captured in the violet filter (400 nm) also reveal a bright polar cloud. The south polar morphology in 2007 was more smooth and lacked the small clouds apparent around the north pole in 2012. Saturn underwent equinox in August 2009. The 2007 observation captured the pre-equinox south pole, and the 2012 observation captured the post-equinox north pole. Thus, the observed differences between the poles are likely due to seasonal effects. If these differences indeed are caused by seasonal effects, continuing observations of the summer north pole by the Cassini mission should show a formation of a polar cloud that appears bright in short-wavelength filters

    Reflected Light Curves, Spherical and Bond Albedos of Jupiter- and Saturn-like Exoplanets

    Get PDF
    Reflected light curves observed for exoplanets indicate that a few of them host bright clouds. We estimate how the light curve and total stellar heating of a planet depends on forward and backward scattering in the clouds based on Pioneer and Cassini spacecraft images of Jupiter and Saturn. We fit analytical functions to the local reflected brightnesses of Jupiter and Saturn depending on the planet's phase. These observations cover broadbands at 0.59–0.72 and 0.39–0.5 ÎŒm, and narrowbands at 0.938 (atmospheric window), 0.889 (CH4 absorption band), and 0.24–0.28 ÎŒm. We simulate the images of the planets with a ray-tracing model, and disk-integrate them to produce the full-orbit light curves. For Jupiter, we also fit the modeled light curves to the observed full-disk brightness. We derive spherical albedos for Jupiter and Saturn, and for planets with Lambertian and Rayleigh-scattering atmospheres. Jupiter-like atmospheres can produce light curves that are a factor of two fainter at half-phase than the Lambertian planet, given the same geometric albedo at transit. The spherical albedo is typically lower than for a Lambertian planet by up to a factor of ~1.5. The Lambertian assumption will underestimate the absorption of the stellar light and the equilibrium temperature of the planetary atmosphere. We also compare our light curves with the light curves of solid bodies: the moons Enceladus and Callisto. Their strong backscattering peak within a few degrees of opposition (secondary eclipse) can lead to an even stronger underestimate of the stellar heating

    Phase light curves for extrasolar Jupiters and Saturns

    Full text link
    We predict how a remote observer would see the brightness variations of giant planets similar to Jupiter and Saturn as they orbit their central stars. We model the geometry of Jupiter, Saturn and Saturn's rings for varying orbital and viewing parameters. Scattering properties for the planets and rings at wavelenghts 0.6-0.7 microns follow Pioneer and Voyager observations, namely, planets are forward scattering and rings are backward scattering. Images of the planet with or without rings are simulated and used to calculate the disk-averaged luminosity varying along the orbit, that is, a light curve is generated. We find that the different scattering properties of Jupiter and Saturn (without rings) make a substantial difference in the shape of their light curves. Saturn-size rings increase the apparent luminosity of the planet by a factor of 2-3 for a wide range of geometries. Rings produce asymmetric light curves that are distinct from the light curve of the planet without rings. If radial velocity data are available for the planet, the effect of the ring on the light curve can be distinguished from effects due to orbital eccentricity. Non-ringed planets on eccentric orbits produce light curves with maxima shifted relative to the position of the maximum planet's phase. Given radial velocity data, the amount of the shift restricts the planet's unknown orbital inclination and therefore its mass. Combination of radial velocity data and a light curve for a non-ringed planet on an eccentric orbit can also be used to constrain the surface scattering properties of the planet. To summarize our results for the detectability of exoplanets in reflected light, we present a chart of light curve amplitudes of non-ringed planets for different eccentricities, inclinations, and the viewing azimuthal angles of the observer.Comment: 40 pages, 13 figures, submitted to Ap.

    Cassini ISS Observation of Saturn’s North Polar Vortex and Comparison to the South Polar Vortex

    Get PDF
    We present analyses of Saturn’s north pole using high-resolution images captured in late 2012 by the Cassini spacecraft’s Imaging Science Subsystem (ISS) camera. The images reveal the presence of an intense cyclonic vortex centered at the north pole. In the red and green visible continuum wavelengths, the north polar region exhibits a cyclonically spiraling cloud morphology extending from the pole to 85°N planetocentric latitude, with a 4700 km radius. Images captured in the methane bands, which sense upper tropospheric haze, show an approximately circular hole in the haze extending up to 1.5° latitude away from the pole. The spiraling morphology and the “eye”-like hole at the center are reminiscent of a terrestrial tropical cyclone. In the System III reference frame (rotation period of 10h39m22.4s, Seidelmann et al. 2007; Archinal et al. 2011), the eastward wind speed increases to about 140 m s^(−1) at 89°N planetocentric latitude. The vorticity is (6.5± 1.5)×10^(−4)s^(−1) at the pole, and decreases to (1.3± 1.2)×10^(−4)s^(−1) at 89°N. In addition, we present an analysis of Saturn’s south polar vortex using images captured in January 2007 to compare its cloud morphology to the north pole. The set of images captured in 2007 includes filters that have not been analyzed before. Images captured in the violet filter (400 nm) also reveal a bright polar cloud. The south polar morphology in 2007 was more smooth and lacked the small clouds apparent around the north pole in 2012. Saturn underwent equinox in August 2009. The 2007 observation captured the pre-equinox south pole, and the 2012 observation captured the post-equinox north pole. Thus, the observed differences between the poles are likely due to seasonal effects. If these differences indeed are caused by seasonal effects, continuing observations of the summer north pole by the Cassini mission should show a formation of a polar cloud that appears bright in short-wavelength filters

    Saturn’s visible lightning, its radio emissions, and the structure of the 2009–2011 lightning storms

    Get PDF
    Visible lightning on Saturn was first detected by the Cassini camera in 2009 at ∌35° South latitude. We report more lightning observations at ∌35° South later in 2009, and lightning in the 2010–2011 giant lightning storm at ∌35° North. The 2009 lightning is detected on the night side of Saturn in a broadband clear filter. The 2011 lightning is detected on the day side in blue wavelengths only. In other wavelengths the 2011 images lacked sensitivity to detect lightning, which leaves the lightning spectrum unknown. The prominent clouds at the west edge, or the “head” of the 2010–2011 storm periodically spawn large anticyclones, which drift off to the east with a longitude spacing of 10–15° (∌10,000 km). The wavy boundary of the storm’s envelope drifts with the anticyclones. The relative vorticity of the anticyclones ranges up to −f/3, where f is the planetary vorticity. The lightning occurs in the diagonal gaps between the large anticyclones. The vorticity of the gaps is cyclonic, and the atmosphere there is clear down to level of the deep clouds. In these respects, the diagonal gaps resemble the jovian belts, which are the principal sites of jovian lightning. The size of the flash-illuminated cloud tops is similar to previous detections, with diameter ∌200 km. This suggests that all lightning on Saturn is generated at similar depths, ∌125–250 km below the cloud tops, probably in the water clouds. Optical energies of individual flashes for both southern storms and the giant storm range up to 8 × 10^9 J, which is larger than the previous 2009 equinox estimate of 1.7 × 10^9 J. Cassini radio measurements at 1–16 MHz suggest that, assuming lightning radio emissions range up to 10 GHz, lightning radio energies are of the same order of magnitude as the optical energies. Southern storms flash at a rate ∌1–2 per minute. The 2011 storm flashes hundreds of times more often, ∌5 times per second, and produces ∌10^(10) W of optical power. Based on this power, the storm’s total convective power is of the order 10^(17) W, which is uncertain by at least an order of magnitude, and probably is underestimated. This power is similar to Saturn’s global internal power radiated to space. It suggests that storms like the 2010–2011 giant storm are important players in Saturn’s cooling and thermal evolution

    Saturn's north polar vortex structure extracted from cloud images by the optical flow method

    Get PDF
    The paper presents velocity fields with ~3‐km spatial resolution of Saturn's north polar vortex (NPV) retrieved using the optical flow method from a sequence of polar‐projected cloud images captured by the Imaging Science Subsystem camera on board NASA's Cassini spacecraft. The fields of the velocity magnitude, velocity variation, relative vorticity, divergence, and second invariant are determined to characterize the flow structures of the inner core of the NPV. The mean zonal and mean meridional velocity profiles of the NPV are compared with previous measurements. We also describe the relevant details of application of the optical flow method to planetary cloud‐tracking wind measurements. The mean zonal velocity profile is consistent with the previous measurements using correlation image velocimetry methods. The small but significant meridional velocity corresponds to outwardly spiraling streams observed in the region near the north pole (NP). The concentrated vorticity and second invariant within 1° planetographic latitude of the NP indicate strong rotational motion of the fluid. An analysis is presented to explore a possible physical origin of the observed spiraling node at the NP

    Dynamics of Saturn's South Polar Vortex

    Get PDF
    The camera onboard the Cassini spacecraft has allowed us to observe many of Saturn's cloud features. We present observations of Saturn's south polar vortex (SPV) showing that it shares some properties with terrestrial hurricanes: cyclonic circulation, warm central region (the eye) surrounded by a ring of high clouds (the eye wall), and convective clouds outside the eye. The polar location and the absence of an ocean are major differences. It also shares properties with the polar vortices on Venus, such as polar location, cyclonic circulation, warm center, and long lifetime, but the Venus vortices have cold collars and are not associated with convective clouds. The SPV's combination of properties is unique among vortices in the solar system
    corecore