Evolution of a Core Gene Network for Skeletogenesis in Chordates

The skeleton is one of the most important features for the reconstruction of vertebrate phylogeny but few data are available to understand its molecular origin. In mammals the Runt genes are central regulators of skeletogenesis. Runx2 was shown to be essential for osteoblast differentiation, tooth development, and bone formation. Both Runx2 and Runx3 are essential for chondrocyte maturation. Furthermore, Runx2 directly regulates Indian hedgehog expression, a master coordinator of skeletal development. To clarify the correlation of Runt gene evolution and the emergence of cartilage and bone in vertebrates, we cloned the Runt genes from hagfish as representative of jawless fish (MgRunxA, MgRunxB) and from dogfish as representative of jawed cartilaginous fish (ScRunx1–3). According to our phylogenetic reconstruction the stem species of chordates harboured a single Runt gene and thereafter Runt locus duplications occurred during early vertebrate evolution. All newly isolated Runt genes were expressed in cartilage according to quantitative PCR. In situ hybridisation confirmed high MgRunxA expression in hard cartilage of hagfish. In dogfish ScRunx2 and ScRunx3 were expressed in embryonal cartilage whereas all three Runt genes were detected in teeth and placoid scales. In cephalochordates (lancelets) Runt, Hedgehog and SoxE were strongly expressed in the gill bars and expression of Runt and Hedgehog was found in endo- as well as ectodermal cells. Furthermore we demonstrate that the lancelet Runt protein binds to Runt binding sites in the lancelet Hedgehog promoter and regulates its activity. Together, these results suggest that Runt and Hedgehog were part of a core gene network for cartilage formation, which was already active in the gill bars of the common ancestor of cephalochordates and vertebrates and diversified after Runt duplications had occurred during vertebrate evolution. The similarities in expression patterns of Runt genes support the view that teeth and placoid scales evolved from a homologous developmental module

Is preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery the appropriate treatment for signet ring cell containing adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction and stomach?

BACKGROUND Recent data suggest primary resection as the preferable approach in patients with signet ring cell gastric cancer (SRC). The aim of our retrospective exploratory study was to evaluate the influence of SRC on prognosis and response in esophagogastric adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS A total of 723 locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinomas (cT3/4 N any) documented in a prospective database from two academic centers were classified according to the WHO definition for SRC (more than 50 % SRC) and analyzed for their association with response and prognosis after neoadjuvant treatment. RESULTS A total of 235 tumors (32.5 %) contained SRC. Median survival of SRC was 26.3 compared with 46.6 months (p < 0.001) for non-SRC. SRC were significantly associated with female gender, gastric localization, advanced ypT and R1/2 categories, and lower risk of surgical complications and anastomotic leakage (each p < 0.001). Clinical (21.1 vs. 33.7 %, p = 0.001) and histopathological response (less than 10 % residual tumor: 16.3 vs. 28.9 %, p < 0.001) were significantly less frequent in SRC. Clinical response (p = 0.003) and complete histopathological response (pCR) (3.4 %) (p = 0.003) were associated with improved prognosis in SRC. Clinical response, surgical complications, ypTN categories, but not SRC were independent prognostic factors in forward Cox regression analysis in R0 resected patients. Risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis was increased (p < 0.001), while local (p = 0.015) and distant metastases (p = 0.02) were less frequent than in non-SRC. CONCLUSIONS Prognosis of SRC is unfavorable. Although response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is rare in SRC, it is associated with improved outcome. Thus, chemotherapy might not generally be abandoned in SRC. A stratification based on SRC should be included in clinical trials

Influence of Different Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Regimens on Response, Prognosis, and Complication Rate in Patients with Esophagogastric Adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND Perioperative chemotherapy improves survival in patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer, but the optimal treatment regimen remains unclear. More intensive chemotherapy may improve outcome, but also increase toxicity and complications. METHODS A total of 843 patients were included in this retrospective study and stratified in 4 groups: doublet therapy with cisplatin or oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil (groups A/B) or triplet therapy with additional epirubicin or taxane (groups C/D). The influence of the different neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens on response, prognosis, and complications was assessed. RESULTS Clinical and pathological response were associated with longer overall survival (OS; p < 0.001). No significant differences regarding response or OS were found, but there was a trend toward better outcome in group D (taxane-containing triplet). In the subgroup of 669 patients with adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction (AEG), patients who had received taxane-containing regimens had a significantly longer OS (p = 0.037), but taxane use was not an independent factor in multivariate analysis. Triple therapy with taxanes did not result in a higher complication rate or postoperative mortality. CONCLUSIONS Although no superior neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen was identified for patients with esophagogastric adenocarcinoma, taxane-containing regimens should be further investigated in randomized trials, especially in patients with AEG tumors

On the Current Care Situation and Treatment of Ocular Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid in Germany

Background Ocular involvement in mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is relatively rare, with a prevalence of 25 cases per million population, equating to approx. 2,100 patients throughout Germany. Diagnosis can be difficult - especially in cases of isolated ocular involvement - and treatment can be complex and lengthy. Immunosuppressants or immunomodulatory drugs are often used. Due to the complexity of diagnosis and treatment, MMP patients are usually referred to specialized centers. The aim of this project was to evaluate the current care situation of patients with ocular MMP in Germany. Methods A paper-based survey was designed and sent to all university eye clinics and other specialized centers in Germany in April 2020. The survey asked about the existence of a specialized outpatient service, the total annual number of patients with MMP, the annual number of newly diagnosed patients, any interdisciplinary collaboration for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes, as well as the local and systemic therapy used. Results Of a total of 44 clinics, 28 (64%) responded, reporting a total average of 27 +/- 42 (0 - 200) patients and 3.6 +/- 2.2 (0 - 10) new cases per year. This corresponds to a total of 741 patients. Only nine (32%) of the responding clinics offer specialized MMP clinics. 93% of the centers collaborate with the local dermatology department. 79% perform serological and histological diagnostics in-house. About half of the centers (n = 16) apply a standardized treatment regime. Systemic glucocorticoids (66.7%) are most commonly used, followed by mycophenolate mofetil and dapsone (57.1%), rituximab (33.3%), azathioprine and cyclophosphamide (28.6%), as well as methotrexate (19.0%). The least frequently used treatment is intravenous immunoglobulin (14.3%). Conclusion This survey of German ophthalmology departments obtained data from about one third of the estimated total cohort of all patients with MMP in Germany. These are presumed to be exclusively patients with at least one ocular involvement. The complex care of these patients is usually provided in collaboration with a dermatologist and with the use of systemic anti-inflammatory medication. Currently, an ophthalmological MMP register is being established to better record the epidemiology and care situation of this rare disease in Germany and to improve it in the long term. Background Ocular involvement in mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is relatively rare, with a prevalence of 25 cases per million population, equating to approx. 2,100 patients throughout Germany. Diagnosis can be difficult - especially in cases of isolated ocular involvement - and treatment can be complex and lengthy. Immunosuppressants or immunomodulatory drugs are often used. Due to the complexity of diagnosis and treatment, MMP patients are usually referred to specialized centers. The aim of this project was to evaluate the current care situation of patients with ocular MMP in Germany. Methods A paper-based survey was designed and sent to all university eye clinics and other specialized centers in Germany in April 2020. The survey asked about the existence of a specialized outpatient service, the total annual number of patients with MMP, the annual number of newly diagnosed patients, any interdisciplinary collaboration for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes, as well as the local and systemic therapy used. Results Of a total of 44 clinics, 28 (64%) responded, reporting a total average of 27 +/- 42 (0 - 200) patients and 3.6 +/- 2.2 (0 - 10) new cases per year. This corresponds to a total of 741 patients. Only nine (32%) of the responding clinics offer specialized MMP clinics. 93% of the centers collaborate with the local dermatology department. 79% perform serological and histological diagnostics in-house. About half of the centers (n = 16) apply a standardized treatment regime. Systemic glucocorticoids (66.7%) are most commonly used, followed by mycophenolate mofetil and dapsone (57.1%), rituximab (33.3%), azathioprine and cyclophosphamide (28.6%), as well as methotrexate (19.0%). The least frequently used treatment is intravenous immunoglobulin (14.3%). Conclusion This survey of German ophthalmology departments obtained data from about one third of the estimated total cohort of all patients with MMP in Germany. These are presumed to be exclusively patients with at least one ocular involvement. The complex care of these patients is usually provided in collaboration with a dermatologist and with the use of systemic anti-inflammatory medication. Currently, an ophthalmological MMP register is being established to better record the epidemiology and care situation of this rare disease in Germany and to improve it in the long term

Zur Versorgungssituation und konservativen Therapie des okulären vernarbenden Schleimhautpemphigoids in Deutschland

$\bf Hintergrund:$ Die okuläre Beteiligung bei vernarbendem Schleimhautpemphigoid (SHP) ist mit einer Prävalenz von 25 Fällen je 1 Mio. Einwohner und damit ca. 2100 Patienten in ganz Deutschland selten. Die Diagnosestellung kann – besonders in Abwesenheit anderer Beteiligungen – schwierig und die Therapie komplex und langwierig sein. Nicht selten kommen Immunsuppressiva zum Einsatz. Aufgrund der Komplexität von Diagnose und Therapie sind SHP-Patienten meist an entsprechend spezialisierte Zentren angebunden. Ziel dieses Projektes war die Erfassung der aktuellen augenärztlichen Versorgungssituation von Patienten mit SHP in Deutschland. $\bf Methoden:$ Eine papierbasierte Umfrage wurde konzipiert und im April 2020 an alle Universitätsaugenkliniken und weitere potenzielle Zentren versandt. Gefragt wurde nach dem Bestehen einer spezialisierten Sprechstunde, der jährlichen Gesamtzahl der betreuten Patienten, der jährlichen Anzahl von neu diagnostizierten Patienten, den klinischen Kooperationspartnern in Diagnostik und Therapie sowie nach der angewendeten lokalen und systemischen Therapie. $\bf Ergebnisse:$ Von insgesamt 44 angeschrieben Kliniken erfolgten 28 (64%) vollständige Rückmeldungen. Im Mittel werden in den Kliniken 27 $\pm$ 42 (0–200) Patienten betreut und jährlich pro Zentrum 3,6 $\pm$ 2,2 (0–10) neue Fälle diagnostiziert. Dies entspricht einer Gesamtpatientenzahl von 741 Patienten. Lediglich 9 (32%) der antwortenden Kliniken bieten eine spezialisierte SHP-Sprechstunde an. 93% der Zentren kooperieren mit der lokalen Klinik für Dermatologie. 79% führen die serologische und histologische Diagnostik intern durch. Etwa die Hälfte der Zentren (n = 16) wendet ein standardisiertes Therapieschema an. Systemisch werden Glukokortikoide (66,7%) am häufigsten verwendet, gefolgt von Mycophenolatmofetil und Dapson (57,1 %), Rituximab (33,3%), Azathioprin und Cyclophosphamid (28,6%) sowie Methotrexat (19,0%). Am seltensten werden i.v. Immunoglobuline eingesetzt (14,3 %). $\bf Schlussfolgerung:$ Mit dieser Umfrage unter deutschen augenärztlichen Zentren wurden Daten von etwa einem Drittel der geschätzten Gesamtzahl aller in Deutschland an einem SHP erkrankten Menschen erhoben. Dabei handelt es sich vermutlich ausschließlich um Patienten mit mindestens einer okulären Beteiligung. Aktuell wird eine augenärztliche SHP-Registerstudie etabliert, um die Epidemiologie und Versorgungssituation besser zu erfassen und langfristig zu verbessern