An anti-HER2 nanobody binds to its antigen HER2 via two independent paratopes

High-resolution structural data of complexes between antibodies and membrane receptors still represent a demanding task. In this study, we used complementary sets of experimental data to obtain a structural model of the complex formed by the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and its specific nanobody A10. First we identified by NMR the residues that bind or rearrange as a consequence of the complex formation. In parallel, the complex was cross-linked, digested and the resulting peptides were characterized by mass-spectrometry to define maximal distance restraints between HER2 and A10 amino acids in their complex. These independent datasets guided a docking process, refined by molecular dynamics simulations, to develop a model of the complex and estimate per-residue free-energy contributions. Such a model explains the experimental data and identifies a second, non-canonical paratope, located in the region opposite to the conventional nanobody paratope, formed by the hypervariable loop regions LH1 and LH3. Both paratopes contributed substantially to the overall affinity by binding to independent HER2 epitopes. Nanobody mutants with substitution of key interaction residues, as indicated by the model, possess significantly lower affinity for HER2. This is the first described case of a "natural" biparatopic nanobody, directly selected by in-vitro panning

Lighting Up Nobel Prize-winning Studies with Protein Intrinsic Disorder

Intrinsically disordered proteins and regions (IDPs and IDRs) and their importance in biology are becoming increasingly recognized in biology, biochemistry, molecular biology and chemistry textbooks, as well as in current protein science and structural biology curricula. We argue that the sequence → dynamic conformational ensemble → function principle is of equal importance as the classical sequence → structure → function paradigm. To highlight this point, we describe the IDPs and/or IDRs behind the discoveries associated with 17 Nobel Prizes, 11 in Physiology or Medicine and 6 in Chemistry. The Nobel Laureates themselves did not always mention that the proteins underlying the phenomena investigated in their award-winning studies are in fact IDPs or contain IDRs. In several cases, IDP- or IDR-based molecular functions have been elucidated, while in other instances, it is recognized that the respective protein(s) contain IDRs, but the specific IDR-based molecular functions have yet to be determined. To highlight the importance of IDPs and IDRs as general principle in biology, we present here illustrative examples of IDPs/IDRs in Nobel Prize-winning mechanisms and processes