Tracheal adenoid cystic carcinoma masquerading asthma: A case report

BACKGROUND: Tracheal tumors are often misdiagnosed as asthma and are treated with inhaled steroids and bronchodilators without resolution. CASE PRESENTATION: Here, a patient with tracheal adenoid cystic carcinoma who had been previously diagnosed with difficult asthma was reported. The possibility of the presence of localized airway obstruction was raised when the flow-volume curve suggesting fixed airway obstruction, was obtained. CONCLUSION: The presenting case report emphasizes the fact that not all wheezes are asthma. It is critical to bear in mind that if a patient does not respond to appropriate anti-asthma therapy, localized obstructions should be ruled out before establishing the diagnosis of asthma

Erlotinib as single agent first line treatment in locally advanced or metastatic activating EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma (CEETAC): an open-label, non-randomized, multicenter, phase IV clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Erlotinib is approved for the first line treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer. Since the number of prospective studies in Caucasian patients treated in routine clinical setting is limited we conducted a multicenter, phase IV clinical trial to determine the efficacy and safety of erlotinib and to demonstrate the feasibility of the validated standardized companion diagnostic method of EGFR mutation detection. METHODS: 651 chemonaive, cytologically or histologically verified advanced stage lung adenocarcinoma patients from Hungary, Turkey and Latvia were screened for exon19 microdeletions and exon21 L858R EGFR mutations using the companion diagnostic EGFR test. EGFR mutation-positive, locally advanced or metastatic lung adenocarcinoma patients received as first line treatment erlotinib at 150 mg/day. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: 62 EGFR mutation-positive patients (9.5% of screened) were included in the safety/intent-to-treat cohort. Median PFS was 12.8 months (95%CI, 9.9-15.8), objective response rate and one-year survival was 66.1% and 82.5%, respectively. Most frequent treatment related adverse events were diarrhoea and rash. Eastern Oncology Cooperative Group Performance Status (ECOG PS), smoking status and M1a/M1b disease stage were significant prognosticators of PFS (p = 0.017, p = 0.045 and p = 0.002, respectively). There was no significant difference in PFS between the subgroups stratified by gender, age or exon19 vs exon21 mutation. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed the efficacy and safety of first line erlotinib monotherapy in Caucasian patients with locally advanced or metastatic lung adenocarcinoma carrying activating EGFR mutations based on the screening with the approved companion diagnostic procedure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01609543

Short-term effect of nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation in patients with restrictive thoracic disease

WOS: 000177535100005PubMed: 12169741Background: The use of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) would be expected to ameliorate dyspnea, ventilatory capacity and exercise tolerance durably in individuals with hypercapnic respiratory failure secondary to restrictive thoracic disease. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the short-term effect of NIPPV on respiratory muscle endurance, exercise capacity and respiratory functions in patients with chronic respiratory failure due to restrictive thoracic disease. Methods: Twelve patients with chronic ventilatory failure due to restrictive thoracic disease underwent nasal bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) ventilation for 2 h a day during 15 consecutive days. The effects were assessed by spirometry, arterial blood gas analysis, 6-min walking test, sensation of dyspnea according to the American Thoracic Society dyspnea scoring scales (ATS) and surface electromyogram of the diaphragm (EMGdi) before and after the study (on day 15). Results: Nasal BiPAP reduced the ATS dyspnea score from 2.5 +/- 0.9 to 1.6 +/- 0.4 (p < 0.01). Distances walked in 6 min increased from 320.66 +/- 93.56 to 382.41 +/- 121.20 m (p < 0.05). Comparison of baseline with levels after nasal BiPAP ventilation showed a statistically significant improvement in PaCO2 (p < 0.05). Forced vital capacity increased from 35 to 50% of the predicted value (p < 0.01). There were no statistically significant reductions in the amplitude of EMGdi after the therapy. Conclusion: These results indicate that NIPPV delivered via nasal BiPAP improves respiratory functions, exercise capacity, and reduces dyspnea in the short term in patients with chronic respiratory failure due to restrictive thoracic disease. Whether such short-term improvements can be sustained merits further study. Copyright (C) 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel