Sub-genic intolerance, ClinVar, and the epilepsies: A whole-exome sequencing study of 29,165 individuals

Both mild and severe epilepsies are influenced by variants in the same genes, yet an explanation for the resulting phenotypic variation is unknown. As part of the ongoing Epi25 Collaboration, we performed a whole-exome sequencing analysis of 13,487 epilepsy-affected individuals and 15,678 control individuals. While prior Epi25 studies focused on gene-based collapsing analyses, we asked how the pattern of variation within genes differs by epilepsy type. Specifically, we compared the genetic architectures of severe developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs) and two generally less severe epilepsies, genetic generalized epilepsy and non-acquired focal epilepsy (NAFE). Our gene-based rare variant collapsing analysis used geographic ancestry-based clustering that included broader ancestries than previously possible and revealed novel associations. Using the missense intolerance ratio (MTR), we found that variants in DEE-affected individuals are in significantly more intolerant genic sub-regions than those in NAFE-affected individuals. Only previously reported pathogenic variants absent in available genomic datasets showed a significant burden in epilepsy-affected individuals compared with control individuals, and the ultra-rare pathogenic variants associated with DEE were located in more intolerant genic sub-regions than variants associated with non-DEE epilepsies. MTR filtering improved the yield of ultra-rare pathogenic variants in affected individuals compared with control individuals. Finally, analysis of variants in genes without a disease association revealed a significant burden of loss-of-function variants in the genes most intolerant to such variation, indicating additional epilepsy-risk genes yet to be discovered. Taken together, our study suggests that genic and sub-genic intolerance are critical characteristics for interpreting the effects of variation in genes that influence epilepsy

SCN2A and Its Related Epileptic Phenotypes

Epilepsies due to SCN2A mutations can present with a broad range of phenotypes that are still not fully understood. Clinical characteristics of SNC2A -related epilepsy may vary from neonatal benign epilepsy to early-onset epileptic encephalopathy, including Ohtahara syndrome and West syndrome, and epileptic encephalopathies occurring at later ages (usually within the first 10 years of life). Some patient may present with intellectual disability and/or autism or movement disorders and without epilepsy. The heterogeneity of the phenotypes associated to such genetic mutations does not always allow the clinician to address his suspect on this gene. For this reason, diagnosis is usually made after a multiple gene panel examination through next generation sequencing (NGS) or after whole exome sequencing (WES) or whole genome sequencing (WGS). Subsequently, confirmation by Sanger sequencing can be obtained. Mutations in SCN2A are inherited as an autosomal dominant trait. Most individuals diagnosed with SCN2A -benign familial neonatal-infantile seizures (BFNIS) have an affected parent; however, hypothetically, a child may present SCN2A -BNFNIS as the result of a de novo pathogenic variant. Almost all individuals with SCN2A and severe epileptic encephalopathies have a de novo pathogenic variant. SNC2A -related epilepsies have not shown a clear genotype-phenotype correlation; in some cases, a same variant may lead to different presentations even within the same family and this could be due to other genetic factors or to environmental causes. There is no standardized treatment for SCN2A -related epilepsy, as it varies in relation to the clinical presentation and the phenotype of the patient, according to its own gene mutation. Treatment is based mainly on antiepileptic drugs, which include classic wide-spectrum drugs, such as valproic acid, levetiracetam, and lamotrigine. However, specific agents, which act directly modulating the sodium channels activity (phenytoin, carbamazepine, oxcarbamazepine, lamotrigine, and zonisamide), have shown positive result, as other sodium channel blockers (lidocaine and mexiletine) or even other drugs with different targets (phenobarbital)