Impaired viral infection and reduced mortality of diatoms in iron-limited oceanic regions

Diatom primary productivity is tightly coupled with carbon export through the ballasted nature of the silica-based cell wall, linking the oceanic silicon and carbon cycles. However, despite low productivity, iron (Fe)-limited regimes are considered ‘hot spots’ of diatom silica burial with enhanced carbon export efficiency, raising questions about the mechanisms driving the biogeochemistry of these regions. Marine viruses are classically recognized as catalysts of remineralization through host lysis, short-circuiting the trophic transfer of carbon and facilitating the retention of dissolved organic matter and associated elements in the surface ocean. Here we used metatranscriptomic analysis of diatoms and associated viruses, along with a suite of physiological and geochemical metrics, to study the interaction between diatoms and viruses in Fe-limited regimes of the northeast Pacific. We found low cell-associated diatom virus diversity and abundance in a chronically Fe-limited region of the subarctic northeast Pacific. In a coastal upwelling region of the California Current, transient iron limitation also substantially reduced viral replication. These observations were recapitulated in Fe-limited cultures of the bloom-forming, centric diatom, Chaetoceros tenuissimus, which exhibited delayed virus-mediated mortality in addition to reduced viral replication. We suggest Fe-limited diatoms escape viral lysis and subsequent remineralization in the surface ocean, providing an additional mechanism contributing to enhanced carbon export efficiency and silica burial in Fe-limited oceanic regimes

Transfer of rhenium to sorghum and mung crops from two soils in tropical Australia: Implications for technetium dose assessment.

Environmental Radioactivity: Migration, measureing and Monitoring in the South Pacific

Dose modelling comparison for terrestrial biota: IAEA EMRAS II Biota Working Group's Little Forest Burial Ground scenario

Radiological doses to terrestrial biota have been examined in a model inter-comparison study that emphasised the identification of factors causing variability in dose estimation. Radiological dose rates were modelled for ten species representing a diverse range of terrestrial plant and animals with varying behavioural and physical attributes. Dose to these organisms may occur from a range of gamma (Co-60, Cs-137), beta (Sr-90) and alpha (Th-232, U-234 and U-238, Pu-238, Pu-239/240 and Am-241) emitting radionuclides. Whilst the study was based on a specific site - the Little Forest Burial Ground, New South Wales, and Australia - it was intended to be representative of conditions at sites throughout the world where low levels of radionuclides exist in soil due to waste disposal or similar activities

Recent developments in the modelling of radionuclide uptake, radiation dose and effects in wildlife

Of the ~600 scientific publications on the Fukushima event, more than 80% relate to themes of transport of radionuclides in environmental media, transfer to wildlife and foodstuffs, and dose to environmental receptors. This focus reflects a continued need for development and harmonisation of radiological modelling approaches such as has been underway through recent IAEA and ICRP initiatives (e.g. EMRAS I and II, MODARIA). Key developments in improving the understanding of uptake of radionuclides in wildlife include establishing the Wildlife Transfer Parameter Database and related IAEA handbook on transfer to wildlife. These sources provide access to a comprehensive collection of transfer parameters, including input from Australian sources (www.wildlifetransferdatabase.org). Key improvements were highlighted in a recent Journal of Environmental Radioactivity special issue (Vol. 121). Dose modelling for wildlife continues to be challenged by the high diversity of biotic types (plankton to whales) and the breadth of exposure scenarios in diverse ecosystems. Modelling codes (e.g. ERICA Tool, RESRAD-Biota) are undergoing updates of their transfer parameters, improvement of capabilities such as probabilistic analysis (e.g. Monte Carlo), and harmonization of approaches through IAEA model testing exercises (e.g., Little Forest Burial Ground biota dose modelling assessment). A recent development has been the use of voxel dosimetry approaches which build on the standard simplified ellipsoid approach by modelling the absorbed doses in individual organs. Recent improvements in defining dose effects to environmental receptors have focused on updating the FREDERICA Radiation Effects Database. The more comprehensive data have allowed for the updating/development of new Species Sensitivity Distributions that better support the benchmark values for potential dose effects, and for improving estimation of population effects (rather than individuals) upon which the environmental protection strategies are based

Accumulation of plutonium in mammalian wildlife tissues following dispersal by accidental-release tests

We examined the distribution of plutonium (Pu) in the tissues of mammalian wildlife inhabiting the relatively undisturbed, semi-arid former Taranaki weapons test site, Maralinga, Australia. The accumulation of absorbed Pu was highest in the skeleton (83% ± 6%), followed by muscle (10% ± 9%), liver (6% ± 6%), kidneys (0.6% ± 0.4%), and blood (0.2%). Pu activity concentrations in lung tissues were elevated relative to the body average. Foetal transfer was higher in the wildlife data than in previous laboratory studies. The amount of Pu in the gastrointestinal tract was highly elevated relative to that absorbed within the body, potentially increasing transfer of Pu to wildlife and human consumers that may ingest gastrointestinal tract organs. The Pu distribution in the Maralinga mammalian wildlife generally aligns with previous studies related to environmental exposure (e.g. Pu in humans from worldwide fallout), but contrasts with the partitioning models that have traditionally been used for human worker-protection purposes (approximately equal deposition in bone and liver) which appear to under-predict the skeletal accumulation in environmental exposure conditions