24 research outputs found

    Simulation scenarios.

    No full text
    (A) low additive noise. (B) medium additive noise. (C) large additive noise. Three levels of noise were added to the reference SPI curves (clustered vs. random) to generate subject-specific SPI curves. (TIF)</p

    Illustration for SPI calculation.

    No full text
    A point pattern consisting of 30 cells, with 10 cells per each type A, B, and C, was simulated. Circles of radius 0.25 were drawn around each point to identify co-occurrences of cell types with the first distance range w1 = (0, 0.25]. Specifically, there were 1 AA, 1 BB, 3 CC, 0 AB, 0 AC, and 0 BC. (TIF)</p

    Kaplan–Meier curves for the overall survival probability from the NSCLC dataset, stratified using the Mantel correlation.

    No full text
    Subjects were classified as clustered vs. random based on the permutation test of the Mantel correlation. P-value of 0.24 indicates non-significant difference in survival probability in two groups. (TIF)</p

    Simulated spatial configurations.

    No full text
    Two reference spatial configurations: clustered (A) and random (B) of five different cell types: CD14+, CD19+, CD4+, CD8+, and CK+. (C): Corresponding spatial entropy at multiple distance ranges for each configuration.</p

    FPCA results from SPI curves in NSCLC dataset.

    No full text
    Spatial heterogeneity in the tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a critical role in gaining insights into tumor development and progression. Conventional metrics typically capture the spatial differential between TME cellular patterns by either exploring the cell distributions in a pairwise fashion or aggregating the heterogeneity across multiple cell distributions without considering the spatial contribution. As such, none of the existing approaches has fully accounted for the simultaneous heterogeneity caused by both cellular diversity and spatial configurations of multiple cell categories. In this article, we propose an approach to leverage spatial entropy measures at multiple distance ranges to account for the spatial heterogeneity across different cellular organizations. Functional principal component analysis (FPCA) is applied to estimate FPC scores which are then served as predictors in a Cox regression model to investigate the impact of spatial heterogeneity in the TME on survival outcome, potentially adjusting for other confounders. Using a non-small cell lung cancer dataset (n = 153) as a case study, we found that the spatial heterogeneity in the TME cellular composition of CD14+ cells, CD19+ B cells, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, and CK+ tumor cells, had a significant non-zero effect on the overall survival (p = 0.027). Furthermore, using a publicly available multiplexed ion beam imaging (MIBI) triple-negative breast cancer dataset (n = 33), our proposed method identified a significant impact of cellular interactions between tumor and immune cells on the overall survival (p = 0.046). In simulation studies under different spatial configurations, the proposed method demonstrated a high predictive power by accounting for both clinical effect and the impact of spatial heterogeneity.</div

    Histograms of first four FPC scores obtained from the NSCLC dataset.

    No full text
    FPC scores were obtained by applying FPCA on the spatial entropy curves from the NSCLC dataset. The scores were centered around 0. (TIF)</p

    First five functional principal components (FPC) obtained from the NSCLC dataset.

    No full text
    For each FPC, the mean function is overlaid with +/- FPC score multiplying 2 standard deviations of the associated score distribution. (TIF)</p

    Lung cancer dataset.

    No full text
    (A) Representative images with distribution of immune cells including CD14+ cells, CD19+ B cells, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, and CK+ tumor cells. (B) Spatial entropy of the five cell types as a function of inter-cell distances.</p
    corecore