1 research outputs found

    Health outcomes and cost-effectiveness of monoclonal SARS-CoV-2 antibodies as pre-exposure prophylaxis

    Get PDF
    IMPORTANCE Pre-exposure prophylaxis with neutralizing SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs PrEP) prevents infection and reduces hospitalizations and the duration thereof for COVID-19 and death among high-risk individuals. However, reduced effectiveness due to a changing SARS-CoV-2 viral landscape and high drug prices remain substantial implementation barriers.OBJECTIVE To assess the cost-effectiveness of mAbs PrEP as COVID-19 PrEP.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS For this economic evaluation, a decision analytic model was developed and parameterized with health care outcome and utilization data from individuals with high risk for COVID-19. The SARS-CoV-2 infection probability, mAbs PrEP effectiveness, and drug pricing were varied. All costs were collected from a third-party payer perspective. Data were analyzed from September 2021 to December 2022.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Health care outcomes including new SARS-CoV-2 infections, hospitalization, and deaths. The cost per death averted and cost-effectiveness ratios using a threshold for prevention interventions of 22000orlessperqualityβˆ’adjustedlifeyear(QALY)gained.RESULTSTheclinicalcohortconsistedof636individualswithCOVIDβˆ’19(mean[SD]age63[18]years;341[5422000 or less per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained.RESULTS The clinical cohort consisted of 636 individuals with COVID-19 (mean [SD] age 63 [18] years; 341 [54%] male). Most individuals were at high risk for severe COVID-19, including 137 (21%) with a body mass index of 30 or higher, 60 (9.4%) with hematological malignant neoplasm, 108 (17%) post-transplantation, and 152 (23.9%) who used immunosuppressive medication before COVID-19. Within the context of a high (18%) SARS-CoV-2 infection probability and low (25%) effectiveness the model calculated a short-term reduction of 42% ward admissions, 31% intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, and 34% deaths. Cost-saving scenarios were obtained with drug prices of 275 and 75% or higher effectiveness. With a 100% effectiveness mAbs PrEP can reduce ward admissions by 70%, ICU admissions by 97%, and deaths by 92%. Drug prices, however, need to reduce to 550forcostβˆ’effectivenessratioslessthan550 for cost-effectiveness ratios less than 22000 per QALY gained per death averted and to 2200forratiosbetween2200 for ratios between 22000 and 88000.CONCLUSIONSANDRELEVANCEInthisstudy,useofmAbsPrEPforpreventingSARSβˆ’CoVβˆ’2infectionswascostβˆ’savingatthebeginningofanepidemicwave(highinfectionprobability)with7588000.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this study, use of mAbs PrEP for preventing SARS-CoV-2 infections was cost-saving at the beginning of an epidemic wave (high infection probability) with 75% or higher effectiveness and drug price of 275. These results are timely and relevant for decision-makers involved in mAbs PrEP implementation. When newer mAbs PrEP combinations become available, guidance on implementation should be formulated ensuring a fast rollout. Nevertheless, advocacy for mAbs PrEP use and critical discussion on drug prices are necessary to ensuring cost-effectiveness for different epidemic settings.Clinical epidemiolog
    corecore