7 research outputs found
The impact of evolving SARS-CoV-2 mutations and variants on COVID-19 vaccines
The emergence of several new variants of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in recent months has raised concerns around the potential impact on ongoing vaccination programs. Data from clinical trials and real-world evidence suggest that current vaccines remain highly effective against the alpha variant (B.1.1.7), while some vaccines have reduced efficacy and effectiveness against symptomatic disease caused by the beta variant (B.1.351) and the delta variant (B.1.617.2); however, effectiveness against severe disease and hospitalization caused by delta remains high. Although data on the effectiveness of the primary regimen against omicron (B.1.1.529) are limited, booster programs using mRNA vaccines have been shown to restore protection against infection and symptomatic disease (regardless of the vaccine used for the primary regimen) and maintain high effectiveness against hospitalization. However, effectiveness against infection and symptomatic disease wanes with time after the booster dose. Studies have demonstrated reductions of varying magnitude in neutralizing activity of vaccine-elicited antibodies against a range of SARS-CoV-2 variants, with the omicron variant in particular exhibiting partial immune escape. However, evidence suggests that T-cell responses are preserved across vaccine platforms, regardless of variant of concern. Nevertheless, various mitigation strategies are under investigation to address the potential for reduced efficacy or effectiveness against current and future SARS-CoV-2 variants, including modification of vaccines for certain variants (including omicron), multivalent vaccine formulations, and different delivery mechanisms
Efficacy of intravenous paracetamol, metamizol and lornoxicam on postoperative pain and morphine consumption after lumbar disc surgery
Background and objective The combination of opioids with supplemental analgesics is commonly used for additive or synergistic analgesic effects. We aimed to determine the most advantageous supplemental analgesic for postoperative pain relief after lumbar disc surgery
Neurosurgery in the Sitting Position: Retrospective Analysis of 692 Adult and Pediatric Cases
AIM: The sitting position is routinely used in many centers, although its use remains controversial and appears to be diminishing because of the risk of venous air embolism (VAE)
A noninflammatory mRNA vaccine for treatment of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis
The ability to control autoreactive T cells without inducing systemic immune suppression is the major goal for treatment of autoimmune diseases. The key challenge is the safe and efficient delivery of pharmaceutically well-defined antigens in a noninflammatory context. Here, we show that systemic delivery of nanoparticle-formulated 1 methylpseudouridine-modified messenger RNA (m1 Psi mRNA) coding for disease-related autoantigens results in antigen presentation on splenic CD11c(+) antigen-presenting cells in the absence of costimulatory signals. In several mouse models of multiple sclerosis, the disease is suppressed by treatment with such m1 Psi mRNA. The treatment effect is associated with a reduction of effector T cells and the development of regulatory T cell (T-reg cell) populations. Notably, these T-reg cells execute strong bystander immunosuppression and thus improve disease induced by cognate and noncognate autoantigens
CT301 - A phase Ib study to evaluate RO7198457, an individualized Neoantigen Specific immunoTherapy (iNeST), in combination with atezolizumab in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors
Background: Neoantigens arising from somatic mutations are attractive targets for cancer immunotherapy as they may be recognized as foreign by the immune system. RO7198457, a systemically administered RNA-Lipoplex iNeST was designed to stimulate T cell responses against neoantigens. A first-in-human Phase Ib study of RO7198457, in combination with the aPD-L1 antibody atezolizumab is being conducted in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors. Methods: RO7198457 is manufactured on a per-patient basis and contains up to 20 tumor-specific neoepitopes. Nine doses of RO7198457 were administered i.v. in weekly and bi-weekly intervals during the 12-week induction stage and every 24 weeks during the maintenance stage. Atezolizumab 1200 mg was administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Results: In total, 132 patients enrolled in cohorts with doses ranging from 15-50 μg RO7198457 in combination with atezolizumab. Most common tumor types were NSCLC, TNBC, melanoma and CRC. The median number of prior therapies was 3 (range 1-11). 39% of patients received prior immunotherapy. Most patients had low levels of PD-L1 expression (93% patients with \u3c5% PD-L1 expression on tumor cells, 79% patients with \u3c5% expression on immune cells). The median number of RO7198457 doses received was 8; 16% of patients discontinued due to PD prior to completing 6 weeks of therapy. The majority of adverse events (AE) were Grade 1-2. AEs occurring in ≥ 15% of patients included infusion related reaction (IRR)/cytokine release syndrome (CRS), fatigue, nausea and diarrhea. IRR/CRS were transient and reversible and presented primarily as Grade 1-2 chills and fever. There were no DLTs. Seven patients (5%) discontinued treatment due to AEs related to study drugs. RO1798457 induced pulsatile release of pro-inflammatory cytokines with each dose, consistent with the innate immune agonist activity of the RNA. RO7198457 induced neoantigen-specific T cell responses were observed in peripheral blood in 37/49 (77%) patients by ex vivo ELISPOT or MHC multimer analysis. Induction of up to 6% MHC multimer-stained CD8+ T-cells with memory phenotype was observed in peripheral blood. RO7198457-induced T cells against multiple neoantigens that were detected in post-treatment tumor biopsies. Of 108 patients who underwent at least one tumor assessment, 9 responded (ORR 8%, including 1 CR) and 53 had SD (49%). Conclusion: RO7198457 in combination with atezolizumab has a manageable safety profile consistent with the mechanisms of action of the study drugs and induces significant levels of neoantigen-specific immune responses. A randomized Ph2 study of RO7198457 1L melanoma patients in combination with pembrolizumab has been initiated, and two randomized clinical trials are planned for the adjuvant treatment of patients with NSCLC and CRC
Abstract CT301: A phase Ib study to evaluate RO7198457, an individualized Neoantigen Specific immunoTherapy (iNeST), in combination with atezolizumab in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors
Background: Neoantigens arising from somatic mutations are attractive targets for cancer immunotherapy as they may be recognized as foreign by the immune system. RO7198457, a systemically administered RNA-Lipoplex iNeST was designed to stimulate T cell responses against neoantigens. A first-in-human Phase Ib study of RO7198457, in combination with the aPD-L1 antibody atezolizumab is being conducted in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors. Methods: RO7198457 is manufactured on a per-patient basis and contains up to 20 tumor-specific neoepitopes. Nine doses of RO7198457 were administered i.v. in weekly and bi-weekly intervals during the 12-week induction stage and every 24 weeks during the maintenance stage. Atezolizumab 1200 mg was administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Results: In total, 132 patients enrolled in cohorts with doses ranging from 15-50 μg RO7198457 in combination with atezolizumab. Most common tumor types were NSCLC, TNBC, melanoma and CRC. The median number of prior therapies was 3 (range 1-11). 39% of patients received prior immunotherapy. Most patients had low levels of PD-L1 expression (93% patients with \u3c5% PD-L1 expression on tumor cells, 79% patients with \u3c5% expression on immune cells). The median number of RO7198457 doses received was 8; 16% of patients discontinued due to PD prior to completing 6 weeks of therapy. The majority of adverse events (AE) were Grade 1-2. AEs occurring in ≥ 15% of patients included infusion related reaction (IRR)/cytokine release syndrome (CRS), fatigue, nausea and diarrhea. IRR/CRS were transient and reversible and presented primarily as Grade 1-2 chills and fever. There were no DLTs. Seven patients (5%) discontinued treatment due to AEs related to study drugs. RO1798457 induced pulsatile release of pro-inflammatory cytokines with each dose, consistent with the innate immune agonist activity of the RNA. RO7198457 induced neoantigen-specific T cell responses were observed in peripheral blood in 37/49 (77%) patients by ex vivo ELISPOT or MHC multimer analysis. Induction of up to 6% MHC multimer-stained CD8+ T-cells with memory phenotype was observed in peripheral blood. RO7198457-induced T cells against multiple neoantigens that were detected in post-treatment tumor biopsies. Of 108 patients who underwent at least one tumor assessment, 9 responded (ORR 8%, including 1 CR) and 53 had SD (49%). Conclusion: RO7198457 in combination with atezolizumab has a manageable safety profile consistent with the mechanisms of action of the study drugs and induces significant levels of neoantigen-specific immune responses. A randomized Ph2 study of RO7198457 1L melanoma patients in combination with pembrolizumab has been initiated, and two randomized clinical trials are planned for the adjuvant treatment of patients with NSCLC and CRC