2 research outputs found
Effect of Double-Bond Substituents on the Rate of Cyclization of α‑Carbomethoxyhex-5-enyl Radicals
Rate
constants have been calculated, and compared with experimental
results, for the cyclizations of 1-carbomethoxy-1-methyl-5-hexenyl
radicals (<b>2</b>) with various substituents on C6. The calculations
have been done by DFT at the B3LYP/6-311++G** level of theory. They
show considerable interaction between C5 and the radical centers even
in the ground state of all of the radicals <b>2</b>. Experimentally,
the radicals have been generated by H<sup>•</sup> transfer
to the corresponding acrylate esters <b>1</b> and the yields
of cyclized products compared to the calculated rate constants. (The
“cyclized products” include those from cyclohydrogenation, <b>4</b>, and those from cycloisomerization, <b>9</b>.) Two
phenyl substituents on C6 (<b>2i</b>), or a phenyl and a methyl
substituent (<b>2g</b>, <b>2h</b>), increase the rate
of cyclization, but a <i>single</i> phenyl substituent on
C6 produces a <i>greater</i> increase. The calculations
show that the two phenyl substituents are twisted in the transition
state for cyclization, while a single phenyl substituent remains flat
in that transition state. A methyl substituent on C6 along with a
single phenyl causes the phenyl to twist in the transition state and
decreases the rate constant for cyclization below that of the H/Ph-substituted <b>2e</b>, <b>2f</b>
Kinetics and Mechanism of the Hydrogenation of the CpCr(CO)<sub>3</sub><sup>•</sup>/[CpCr(CO)<sub>3</sub>]<sub>2</sub> Equilibrium to CpCr(CO)<sub>3</sub>H
The
kinetics of the hydrogenation of 2 CpCrÂ(CO)<sub>3</sub><sup>•</sup>/[CpCrÂ(CO)<sub>3</sub>]<sub>2</sub> to CpCrÂ(CO)<sub>3</sub>H has
been investigated. The reaction is second-order in Cr
and first-order in H<sub>2</sub>, with a rate constant (if the rate
law is written with [CpCrÂ(CO)<sub>3</sub><sup>•</sup>]<sup>2</sup>) of 12(2) M<sup>–2</sup> s<sup>–1</sup> at
25 °C in benzene. DFT calculations rule out a <i>side-on</i> H<sub>2</sub> complex as an intermediate and suggest either (1) <i>homolytic</i> cleavage via a collinear Cr–H–H–Cr
transition state or (2) <i>end-on</i> approach of H<sub>2</sub> to one Cr as charge is transferred to the other, followed
by <i>heterolytic</i> cleavage of the coordinated H<sub>2</sub> between the first Cr and the O of a carbonyl ligand on the
second Cr, and eventual isomerization of the resulting O-protonated
intermediate to CpCrÂ(CO)<sub>3</sub>H