Performance of the Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring (isCGM) System during a High Oral Glucose Challenge in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes : A Prospective Secondary Outcome Analysis

To assess intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) performance for different rates of change in plasma glucose (RCPG) during glycemic challenges in type 1 diabetes (T1D). Nineteen people with T1D (7 females; age 35 ± 11 years; HbA1c 7.3 ± 0.6% (56 ± 7 mmol/mol)) performing two glycemic challenges (OGTT) were included. During OGTTs, plasma glucose was compared against sensor glucose for timepoints 0 min (pre-OGTT), +15 min, +30 min, +60 min, +120 min, +180 min, and +240 min by means of median absolute (relative) difference (MARD and MAD) and Clarke Error Grid (CEG), then was stratified for RCPG and glycemic ranges. Overall, MARD was 8.3% (4.0–14.8) during hypoglycemia level 1 18.8% (15.8–22.0), euglycemia 9.5% (4.3–15.1), hyperglycemia level 1 9.4% (4.0–17.2), and hyperglycemia level 2 7.1% (3.3–11.9). The MARD was associated with the RCPG (p < 0.0001), detailing significant differences in comparison of low, moderate, high, and very high RCPG (p = 0.014). Overall, CEG resulted in 88% (212 values) of comparison points in zone A, 12% (29 values) in zone B, and 0.4% (1 value) in zone D. The isCGM system was accurate during OGTTs. Its performance was dependent on the RCPG and showed an overestimation of the actual reference glucose during hypoglycemia

Impact of a Single 36 Hours Prolonged Fasting Period in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes : A Cross-Over Controlled Trial

Prolonged fasting has shown beneficial effects in healthy individuals and in people with chronic diseases. In type 1 diabetes, the effect or even the feasibility of fasting is unclear. We aimed to assess the impact and safety of prolonged fasting in adults with type 1 diabetes. Glycemia was assessed during overnight fasting (12 hours) vs. prolonged fasting (36 hours) via an intermittently-scanned continuous glucose monitoring system. Anthropometric data, metabolic and hormonal markers were compared between both trial arms. After each fasting period, a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test was performed and plasma glucose levels and hormones were assessed. Data were compared via paired t-tests and mixed-model regressions (p ≤ 0.05). Twenty individuals with type 1 diabetes (7 females) with a mean ± SD age of 35 ± 11 years, body mass index (BMI) 24.8 ± 2.8 kg/m(2) and HbA(1c) 54 ± 7 mmol/mol were included. Hypoglycemia/hour (70 mg/dL; <3.9 mmol/L) was similar in both trial arms (12 hrs: 0.07 ± 0.06 vs. 36 hrs: 0.05 ± 0.03, p=0.21). Glycemic excursions during the oral glucose tolerance test were not different after the two fasting periods. Beta-hydroxybutyrate levels were higher after prolonged fasting (p=0.0006). Our study showed that people with type 1 diabetes can safely perform a 36 hours fasting period with a low risk of hypoglycemia and ketoacidosis. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS.de, identifier DRKS00016148

Can sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors be beneficial in patients with acute myocardial infarction?

The sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), empagliflozin, dapagliflozin, and canagliflozin, have shown impressive beneficial effects in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in mandatory cardiovascular outcome trials. Retrospective data analysis revealed signals that pointed towards positive effects independent of the antidiabetic effects. This could be confirmed for empagliflozin and dapagliflozin in chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction alone, where rates of hospitalization for heart failure and cumulative major adverse cardiovascular events were reduced to a similar extent in patients with and without diabetes mellitus as in corresponding outcome trials. Cardiac remodeling following myocardial infarction leads to heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in many patients and aggravates morbidity and mortality. Clinical data of SGLT2i treatment after acute myocardial infarction is sparse. This review focuses on available experimental data on the effects of SGLT2i used before, during, and after myocardial infarction as well as already published and currently ongoing clinical trials

Impact of the SGLT2-inhibitor empagliflozin on inflammatory biomarkers after acute myocardial infarction – a post-hoc analysis of the EMMY trial

Abstract Background SGTL2-inhibitors are a cornerstone in the treatment of heart failure, but data on patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is limited. The EMMY trial was the first to show a significant reduction in NTproBNP levels as well as improved cardiac structure and function in post-AMI patients treated with Empagliflozin compared to placebo. However, data on the potential impact of SGLT2-inhibitors on inflammatory biomarkers after AMI are scarce. Materials and methods The EMMY trial is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, which enrolled patients after AMI, receiving either 10 mg Empagliflozin once daily or placebo over a period of 26 weeks on top of standard guideline-recommended therapy starting within 72 h after percutaneous coronary intervention. In this post-hoc subgroup analysis of the EMMY trial, we investigated inflammatory biomarkers of 374 patients. The endpoints investigated were the mean change in inflammatory biomarkers such as high-sensitive c-reactive protein (hsCRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), neutrophils, leukocytes, neutrophile/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) from baseline to 26 weeks. Results Baseline median (interquartile ranges) IL-6 was 17.9 pg/mL (9.0-38.7), hsCRP 18.9 mg/L (11.2–37.1), neutrophil count 7.9 x G/L (6.2–10.1), leukocyte count 10.8 x G/L (9.1–12.8) and neutrophile/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) of 0.74 (0.67–0.80). At week 26, a significant mean reduction in inflammatory biomarkers was observed, being 35.1 ± 3.2% (p < 0.001) for IL-6, 57.4 ± 0.7% (p < 0.001) for hsCRP, 26.1 ± 0.7% (p < 0.001) for neutrophils, 20.5 ± 0.6% (p < 0.001) for leukocytes, 10.22 ± 0.50% (p < 0.001) for NLR, and − 2.53 ± 0.92% for PLR (p = 0.006) with no significant difference between Empagliflozin and placebo treatment. Conclusion Trajectories of inflammatory biomarkers showed a pronounced decline after AMI, but Empagliflozin treatment did not impact this decline indicating no central role in blunted systemic inflammation mediating beneficial effects

Improved glycaemic variability and basal insulin dose reduction during a running competition in recreationally active adults with type 1 diabetes-A single-centre, prospective, controlled observational study.

IntroductionTo investigate the glycaemic response, macronutrient intake and insulin management in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) compared to healthy individuals around a running competition.Material and methodsThis was a single-centre, prospective, controlled observational study performed in individuals with T1D and healthy people. 24 people (12 T1D) were included in this study (age: T1D 41±12 vs. healthy 38±6 years, females: 3 vs. 6, BMI: 25.53.0 vs. 22.9±2.8 kg/m2). Both groups received an intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM; FreeStyle Libre 1, Abbott, USA) system to assess glycaemia 24 hours before, during and 24 hours after a running competition. During this period, participants recorded their food intake and insulin administration. Data were analysed via ANOVA and mixed model analyses with post-hoc testing (p≤0.05).ResultsFor overall glycaemic ranges in comparison of groups, significant differences were found for time in range (T1D 63±21% vs. healthy 89±13%, p = 0.001), time above range (TAR) 1 (T1D 21±15% vs. healthy 0±0%, pConclusionPeople with T1D have impaired glucose responses around a running competition compared to healthy individuals. However, basal insulin dose reductions were sufficient to prevent further dysglycaemia.Clinical trial iddrks.de; DRKS00019886

Feasibility and safety of using an automated decision support system for insulin therapy in the treatment of steroid‐induced hyperglycemia in patients with acute graft‐versus‐host disease: A randomized trial

Abstract Steroid‐induced hyperglycemia (SIHG) has shown to independently increase the risk for mortality in patients with acute graft‐versus‐host disease, and it is still unclear whether SIHG might be a modifiable risk factor. Therefore, a feasibility trial was carried out aiming to evaluate the performance of a standardized decision support system (GlucoTab [GT]) for insulin therapy in patients with SIHG. A total of 10 hyperglycemic acute graft‐versus‐host disease patients were included and treated either with GT or standard of care during hospitalization. Follow‐up duration was 6 months. Comparing the GT versus standard of care group, 364 versus 1,020 glucose readings were available during a median of 41 days (interquartile range [IQR] 22–89) and 101 days (IQR 55–147) of hospitalization. The median overall glucose levels were 151 mg/dL (123–192) versus 162 mg/dL (IQR 138–193) for GT and standard of care, respectively (P < 0.001); hypoglycemia rates were comparably low. Treatment of SIHG with an algorithm‐based system for subcutaneous insulin was feasible and safe

Additional file 1 of Alterations in trimethylamine-N-oxide in response to Empagliflozin therapy: a secondary analysis of the EMMY trial

Additional file 1: Fig. S1. Distribution of untransformed TMAO concentration (μmol/L) by treatment groups at A—baseline, B—6 weeks, and C—26 weeks. Table S1. LDL-C levels over visits by treatment groups

Timing of SGLT2i initiation after acute myocardial infarction

Abstract Background Pharmacological post-MI treatment is routinely initiated at intensive/cardiac care units. However, solid evidence for an early start of these therapies is only available for dual platelet therapy and statins, whereas data on beta blockers and RAAS inhibitors are heterogenous and mainly limited to STEMI and heart failure patients. Recently, the EMMY trial provided the first evidence on the beneficial effects of SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) when initiated early after PCI. In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, SGLT2i are considered “sick days drugs” and it, therefore, remains unclear if very early SGLT2i initiation following MI is as safe and effective as delayed initiation. Methods and results The EMMY trial evaluated the effect of empagliflozin on NT-proBNP and functional and structural measurements. Within the Empagliflozin group, 22 (9.5%) received early treatment (< 24 h after PCI), 98 (42.2%) within a 24 to < 48 h window (intermediate), and 111 (48.1%) between 48 and 72 h (late). NT-proBNP levels declined by 63.5% (95%CI: − 69.1; − 48.1) in the early group compared to 61.0% (− 76.0; − 41.4) in the intermediate and 61.9% (− 70.8; − 45.7) in the late group (n.s.) within the Empagliflozin group with no significant treatment groups—initiation time interaction (pint = 0.96). Secondary endpoints of left ventricular function (LV-EF, e/e`) as well as structure (LVESD and LVEDD) were also comparable between the groups. No significant difference in severe adverse event rate between the initiation time groups was detected. Conclusion Very early administration of SGLT2i after acute myocardial infarction does not show disadvantageous signals with respect to safety and appears to be as effective in reducing NT-proBNP as well as improving structural and functional LV markers as initiation after 2–3 days

Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 Performance in Austrian COVID-19 Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Units with and without Diabetes

This study evaluated and compared the performance of simplified acute physiology score 3 (SAPS 3) for predicting in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) with and without diabetes in Austria. The Austrian national public health institute (GÖG) data of COVID-19 patients admitted to ICUs (n = 5850) were analyzed. Three versions of SAPS 3 were used: standard equation, Central European equation, and Austrian equation customized for COVID-19 patients. The observed in-hospital mortality was 38.9%, 42.9%, and 37.3% in all, diabetes, and non-diabetes patients, respectively. The overall C-statistics was 0.69 with an insignificant (p = 0.193) difference between diabetes (0.70) and non-diabetes (0.68) patients. The Brier score was > 0.20 for all SAPS 3 equations in all cohorts. Calibration was unsatisfactory for both standard and Central European equations in all cohorts, whereas it was satisfactory for the Austrian equation in diabetes patients only. The SAPS 3 score demonstrated low discrimination and accuracy in Austrian COVID-19 patients, with an insignificant difference between diabetes and non-diabetes. All equations were miscalibrated particularly in non-diabetes patients, while the Austrian equation showed satisfactory calibration in diabetes patients only. Both uncalibrated and calibrated versions of SAPS 3 should be used with caution in COVID-19 patients