Sensitivity of ICD coding for sepsis in children-a population-based study.

BACKGROUND International Classification of Diseases 10th edition (ICD-10) is widely used to describe the burden of disease. AIM To describe how well ICD-10 coding captures sepsis in children admitted to the hospital with blood culture-proven bacterial or fungal infection and systemic inflammatory response syndrome. METHODS Secondary analysis of a population-based, multicenter, prospective cohort study on children with blood culture-proven sepsis of nine tertiary pediatric hospitals in Switzerland. We compared the agreement of validated study data on sepsis criteria with ICD-10 coding abstraction obtained at the participating hospitals. RESULTS We analyzed 998 hospital admissions of children with blood culture-proven sepsis. The sensitivity of ICD-10 coding abstraction was 60% (95%-CI 57-63) for sepsis; 35% (95%-CI 31-39) for sepsis with organ dysfunction, using an explicit abstraction strategy; and 65% (95%-CI 61-69) using an implicit abstraction strategy. For septic shock, the sensitivity of ICD-10 coding abstraction was 43% (95%-CI 37-50). Agreement of ICD-10 coding abstraction with validated study data varied by the underlying infection type and disease severity (p < 0.05). The estimated national incidence of sepsis, inferred from ICD-10 coding abstraction, was 12.5 per 100,000 children (95%-CI 11.7-13.5) and 21.0 per 100,000 children (95%-CI 19.8-22.2) using validated study data. CONCLUSIONS In this population-based study, we found a poor representation of sepsis and sepsis with organ dysfunction by ICD-10 coding abstraction in children with blood culture-proven sepsis when compared against a prospective validated research dataset. Sepsis estimates in children based on ICD-10 coding may thus severely underestimate the true prevalence of the disease. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44253-023-00006-1

Sensitivity of ICD coding for sepsis in children-a population-based study

BACKGROUND International Classification of Diseases 10th edition (ICD-10) is widely used to describe the burden of disease. AIM To describe how well ICD-10 coding captures sepsis in children admitted to the hospital with blood culture-proven bacterial or fungal infection and systemic inflammatory response syndrome. METHODS Secondary analysis of a population-based, multicenter, prospective cohort study on children with blood culture-proven sepsis of nine tertiary pediatric hospitals in Switzerland. We compared the agreement of validated study data on sepsis criteria with ICD-10 coding abstraction obtained at the participating hospitals. RESULTS We analyzed 998 hospital admissions of children with blood culture-proven sepsis. The sensitivity of ICD-10 coding abstraction was 60% (95%-CI 57-63) for sepsis; 35% (95%-CI 31-39) for sepsis with organ dysfunction, using an explicit abstraction strategy; and 65% (95%-CI 61-69) using an implicit abstraction strategy. For septic shock, the sensitivity of ICD-10 coding abstraction was 43% (95%-CI 37-50). Agreement of ICD-10 coding abstraction with validated study data varied by the underlying infection type and disease severity (p < 0.05). The estimated national incidence of sepsis, inferred from ICD-10 coding abstraction, was 12.5 per 100,000 children (95%-CI 11.7-13.5) and 21.0 per 100,000 children (95%-CI 19.8-22.2) using validated study data. CONCLUSIONS In this population-based study, we found a poor representation of sepsis and sepsis with organ dysfunction by ICD-10 coding abstraction in children with blood culture-proven sepsis when compared against a prospective validated research dataset. Sepsis estimates in children based on ICD-10 coding may thus severely underestimate the true prevalence of the disease. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44253-023-00006-1

Changepoint analysis of gestational age and birth weight: proposing a refinement of Diagnosis Related Groups

Background: Although the complexity and length of treatment is connected to the newborn’s maturity and birth weight, most case-mix grouping schemes classify newborns by birth weight alone. The objective of this study was to determine whether the definition of thresholds based on a changepoint analysis of variability of birth weight and gestational age contributes to a more homogenous classification. Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted at a Tertiary Care Center with Level III Neonatal Intensive Care and included neonate cases from 2016 through 2018. The institutional database of routinely collected health data was used. The design of this cohort study was explorative. The cases were categorized according to WHO gestational age classes and SwissDRG birth weight classes. A changepoint analysis was conducted. Cut-off values were determined. Results: When grouping the cases according to the calculated changepoints, the variability within the groups with regard to case related costs could be reduced. A refined grouping was achieved especially with cases of >2500 g birth weight. An adjusted Grouping Grid for practical purposes was developed. Conclusions: A novel method of classification of newborn cases by changepoint analysis was developed, providing the possibility to assign costs or outcome indicators to grouping mechanisms by gestational age and birth weight combined. © 2019, International Pediatric Research Foundation, Inc